Discussion:
Libs: Please name ONE black-run country that ISN'T a s---hole?
(too old to reply)
RichA
2018-01-12 23:45:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Somalia? Nigeria? Malawi? Togo? Kenya? Uganda? (sorry, South Africa still relies mostly on WHITE intelligence to run most of it).
David Johnston
2018-01-13 00:17:55 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
<shrug> A American president who refers to any country as a shithole is
a moron regardless of its relative lack of prosperity. Dealing with
foreign nations is part of the responsibility of being president and
displaying his contempt for them is an ineffective way to do that.
What's more the question he was asked was stupid. If someone lives in a
prosperous and safe country, why the hell would they choose to leave it
and go to a place where their future would be much more uncertain and
somewhat more dangerous?
No Snowflakes
2018-01-13 01:42:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:17:55 -0700 LIttle Blue Snowflake David Johnston
Post by David Johnston
<shrug> A American president who refers to any country as a shithole is
a moron regardless of its relative lack of prosperity. Dealing with
foreign nations is part of the responsibility of being president and
displaying his contempt for them is an ineffective way to do that.
What's more the question he was asked was stupid. If someone lives in a
prosperous and safe country, why the hell would they choose to leave it
and go to a place where their future would be much more uncertain and
somewhat more dangerous?
The truth hurts!

The US doesn't need or want these immigrants from these shitholes. Take
you pick around the world. Really you don't need to look too far! Just
look south!

Shithole right there to the south of the US! Those who immigrate, or
mostly come here illegally look the areas they congregate in. They are
slums and ghettos that look all to much like the areas they came from!

I for one am glad to see a US President turn the filter off, and tell
these places the truth! It is very refreshing. Maybe now these places
will go try to suck from some other teet! Good riddance!
trotsky
2018-01-13 10:57:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by No Snowflakes
On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:17:55 -0700 LIttle Blue Snowflake David Johnston
Post by David Johnston
<shrug> A American president who refers to any country as a shithole is
a moron regardless of its relative lack of prosperity. Dealing with
foreign nations is part of the responsibility of being president and
displaying his contempt for them is an ineffective way to do that.
What's more the question he was asked was stupid. If someone lives in a
prosperous and safe country, why the hell would they choose to leave it
and go to a place where their future would be much more uncertain and
somewhat more dangerous?
The truth hurts!
The US doesn't need or want these immigrants from these shitholes.
That's an odd thing to say because they could be brain dead and still
have more mental capacity than our "President".
Ed Stasiak
2018-01-13 02:00:39 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by No Snowflakes
David Johnston
If someone lives in a prosperous and safe country, why the hell would
they choose to leave it and go to a place where their future would be
much more uncertain and somewhat more dangerous?
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded with those
from shithole countries?
RichA
2018-01-13 02:03:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by No Snowflakes
David Johnston
If someone lives in a prosperous and safe country, why the hell would
they choose to leave it and go to a place where their future would be
much more uncertain and somewhat more dangerous?
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded with those
from shithole countries?
Liberal guilt?
BTR1701
2018-01-13 04:50:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by No Snowflakes
David Johnston
If someone lives in a prosperous and safe country, why the hell would
they choose to leave it and go to a place where their future would be
much more uncertain and somewhat more dangerous?
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe
country, why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be
flooded with those from shithole countries?
If the Red Cross won't even take your donated blood for two years after
you visit a country, that's a country that we don't want a lot of
immigration from (if we're sane).

I think it's idiotic for government officials to be using offensive
vulgarities to describe them, but that doesn't change the underlying
facts.
ZZyXX
2018-01-13 05:07:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by No Snowflakes
David Johnston
If someone lives in a prosperous and safe country, why the hell would
they choose to leave it and go to a place where their future would be
much more uncertain and somewhat more dangerous?
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded with those
from shithole countries?
an even better question to ask: if someone lives in a prosperous and
safe country, why the hell would they tolerate so many people being
without health care, why would they tolerate children going hungry?
Ed Stasiak
2018-01-13 17:55:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by ZZyXX
ZZyXX
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded with those
from shithole countries?
an even better question to ask: if someone lives in a prosperous and
safe country, why the hell would they tolerate so many people being
without health care, why would they tolerate children going hungry?
Sure, and that’s corrected by improving the quality of life where the problems are,
not importing the problems here.
ZZyXX
2018-01-13 21:23:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by ZZyXX
ZZyXX
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded with those
from shithole countries?
an even better question to ask: if someone lives in a prosperous and
safe country, why the hell would they tolerate so many people being
without health care, why would they tolerate children going hungry?
Sure, and that’s corrected by improving the quality of life where the problems are,
not importing the problems here.
what problems are we importing?
BTR1701
2018-01-13 22:51:55 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by ZZyXX
Post by ZZyXX
ZZyXX
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe
country, why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be
flooded with those from shithole countries?
an even better question to ask: if someone lives in a prosperous and
safe country, why the hell would they tolerate so many people being
without health care, why would they tolerate children going hungry?
Sure, and that's corrected by improving the quality of life where the
problems are, not importing the problems here.
what problems are we importing?
Take a stroll around East L.A. and report back.
FPP
2018-01-14 13:11:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BTR1701
Post by ZZyXX
Post by ZZyXX
ZZyXX
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe
country, why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be
flooded with those from shithole countries?
an even better question to ask: if someone lives in a prosperous and
safe country, why the hell would they tolerate so many people being
without health care, why would they tolerate children going hungry?
Sure, and that's corrected by improving the quality of life where the
problems are, not importing the problems here.
what problems are we importing?
Take a stroll around East L.A. and report back.
Non-answer answer noted.
--
"Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination Thursday July 22nd."
"ISIS claimed responsibility". - J. P. Shanley
BTR1701
2018-01-14 18:09:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by ZZyXX
Post by ZZyXX
ZZyXX
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous
and safe country, why the hell would they choose to allow
their country to be flooded with those from shithole countries?
an even better question to ask: if someone lives in a prosperous and
safe country, why the hell would they tolerate so many people being
without health care, why would they tolerate children going hungry?
Sure, and that's corrected by improving the quality of life where the
problems are, not importing the problems here.
what problems are we importing?
Take a stroll around East L.A. and report back.
Non-answer answer noted.
It was answer, just one you didn't like.
RichA
2018-01-14 19:27:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by ZZyXX
Post by ZZyXX
ZZyXX
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous
and safe country, why the hell would they choose to allow
their country to be flooded with those from shithole countries?
an even better question to ask: if someone lives in a prosperous and
safe country, why the hell would they tolerate so many people being
without health care, why would they tolerate children going hungry?
Sure, and that's corrected by improving the quality of life where the
problems are, not importing the problems here.
what problems are we importing?
Take a stroll around East L.A. and report back.
Non-answer answer noted.
It was answer, just one you didn't like.
40 posts in. Still no black country that ISN'T a s---hole. Trump right again.
trotsky
2018-01-15 10:36:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by RichA
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by ZZyXX
Post by ZZyXX
ZZyXX
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous
and safe country, why the hell would they choose to allow
their country to be flooded with those from shithole countries?
an even better question to ask: if someone lives in a prosperous and
safe country, why the hell would they tolerate so many people being
without health care, why would they tolerate children going hungry?
Sure, and that's corrected by improving the quality of life where the
problems are, not importing the problems here.
what problems are we importing?
Take a stroll around East L.A. and report back.
Non-answer answer noted.
It was answer, just one you didn't like.
40 posts in. Still no black country that ISN'T a s---hole. Trump right again.
You don't even have the balls to write "shithole" so are you really
qualified to comment?
FPP
2018-01-14 22:15:41 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by ZZyXX
Post by ZZyXX
ZZyXX
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous
and safe country, why the hell would they choose to allow
their country to be flooded with those from shithole countries?
an even better question to ask: if someone lives in a prosperous and
safe country, why the hell would they tolerate so many people being
without health care, why would they tolerate children going hungry?
Sure, and that's corrected by improving the quality of life where the
problems are, not importing the problems here.
what problems are we importing?
Take a stroll around East L.A. and report back.
Non-answer answer noted.
It was answer, just one you didn't like.
Non answer excuse noted.

You were directly asked "what problems".
You didn't cite a single problem. You told him to go and take a walk.

Some lawyer you'd make.
--
"Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination Thursday July 22nd."
"ISIS claimed responsibility". - J. P. Shanley
RichA
2018-01-14 00:05:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by ZZyXX
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by ZZyXX
ZZyXX
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded with those
from shithole countries?
an even better question to ask: if someone lives in a prosperous and
safe country, why the hell would they tolerate so many people being
without health care, why would they tolerate children going hungry?
Sure, and that’s corrected by improving the quality of life where the problems are,
not importing the problems here.
what problems are we importing?
If Canada hadn't let NEGROES, from Jamaica and Somalia in, our 50-odd murders a year would be 1-2 in Toronto. Think about it.
trotsky
2018-01-15 10:38:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by RichA
Post by ZZyXX
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by ZZyXX
ZZyXX
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded with those
from shithole countries?
an even better question to ask: if someone lives in a prosperous and
safe country, why the hell would they tolerate so many people being
without health care, why would they tolerate children going hungry?
Sure, and that’s corrected by improving the quality of life where the problems are,
not importing the problems here.
what problems are we importing?
If Canada hadn't let NEGROES, from Jamaica and Somalia in, our 50-odd murders a year would be 1-2 in Toronto. Think about it.
Totally true. Sprinkle your magic beans and pull your pud some more and
see if that fixes things. Otherwise, admit you live in a shithole.
FPP
2018-01-13 06:48:40 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by No Snowflakes
David Johnston
If someone lives in a prosperous and safe country, why the hell would
they choose to leave it and go to a place where their future would be
much more uncertain and somewhat more dangerous?
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish
before them?

If American would have done that, back then - what language would you
have been speaking right now, I wonder?
--
"Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination Thursday July 22nd."
"ISIS claimed responsibility". - J. P. Shanley
trotsky
2018-01-13 10:56:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by FPP
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by No Snowflakes
David Johnston
If someone lives in a prosperous and safe country, why the hell would
they choose to leave it and go to a place where their future would be
much more uncertain and somewhat more dangerous?
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish
before them?
If American would have done that, back then - what language would you
have been speaking right now, I wonder?
Actually, wasn't America settled by Brit colonists because the King of
England had turned England into a shithole?
The Horny Goat
2018-01-13 14:52:42 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by trotsky
Post by FPP
If American would have done that, back then - what language would you
have been speaking right now, I wonder?
Actually, wasn't America settled by Brit colonists because the King of
England had turned England into a shithole?
By present day standards that would describe most of the world in the
late 17th early 18th century when my ancestors came to America.

(Yes I'm a Canadian - most of my ancestors who were in the New World
at that time were in what became the 13 colonies and yes I have
Mayflower ancestors)

In all seriousness would you trade your current standard of living for
Henry VIII's? Sure you had power of life or death for most of the
people around you and sure you could boink pretty much any woman you
chose but when Henry was the age I am now he was dead.
trotsky
2018-01-13 15:28:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Horny Goat
Post by trotsky
Post by FPP
If American would have done that, back then - what language would you
have been speaking right now, I wonder?
Actually, wasn't America settled by Brit colonists because the King of
England had turned England into a shithole?
By present day standards that would describe most of the world in the
late 17th early 18th century when my ancestors came to America.
(Yes I'm a Canadian - most of my ancestors who were in the New World
at that time were in what became the 13 colonies and yes I have
Mayflower ancestors)
In all seriousness would you trade your current standard of living for
Henry VIII's? Sure you had power of life or death for most of the
people around you and sure you could boink pretty much any woman you
chose but when Henry was the age I am now he was dead.
He did pen the words to the traditional song "Greensleeves" so he has
that going for him.
Ed Stasiak
2018-01-13 18:04:42 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish before them?
No, they were European.
If American would have done that, back then - what language would you have
been speaking right now, I wonder?
Probably Polish, as my mom would have been content going back to Poland
after the war and only immigrated as the country had been handed over to the
Soviets.

Dad probably still would have immigrated, as he was a farm boy and had no
interest in going back to that.
FPP
2018-01-13 22:18:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ed Stasiak
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed. Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then. So was Italy.

So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those filthy
Irish into "our" country. And the filthy Italians. And the filthy Greeks.

That's called White Supremacy - and we still have groups that advocate
it today. They like to cover their faces with white hoods.

Make America White Again. Funny... but I don't remember seeing that in
the Declaration, or the Constitution.
--
"Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination Thursday July 22nd."
"ISIS claimed responsibility". - J. P. Shanley
BTR1701
2018-01-13 22:56:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ed Stasiak
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe
country, why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be
flooded with those from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed. Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then. So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those filthy
Irish into "our" country. And the filthy Italians. And the filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy
?!?!? The Irish, Italians, and Greeks are white. How is denigrating them
white supremacy?

And why do capitalize 'white supremacy'? Do you respect it that much?
FPP
2018-01-14 13:18:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ed Stasiak
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe
country, why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be
flooded with those from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed. Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then. So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those filthy
Irish into "our" country. And the filthy Italians. And the filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy
?!?!? The Irish, Italians, and Greeks are white. How is denigrating them
white supremacy?
And why do capitalize 'white supremacy'? Do you respect it that much?
I find Trump has turned the phrase "White Supremacy" into a bona fide
movement that deserves a proper title.

They all came from what Trump would have called shithole countries. And
Italians and Greeks both have segments of their population that are
darker - usually described as "swarthy".

Black haired, black eyed Mediterraneans.
--
"Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination Thursday July 22nd."
"ISIS claimed responsibility". - J. P. Shanley
BTR1701
2018-01-14 18:08:44 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ed Stasiak
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous
and safe country, why the hell would they choose to allow their
country to be flooded with those from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed. Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then. So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country. And the filthy Italians. And
the filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy
?!?!? The Irish, Italians, and Greeks are white. How is denigrating
them white supremacy?
And why do capitalize 'white supremacy'? Do you respect it that much?
I find Trump has turned the phrase "White Supremacy" into a bona fide
movement that deserves a proper title.
They all came from what Trump would have called shithole countries. And
Italians and Greeks both have segments of their population that are
darker - usually described as "swarthy".
Just as there are lighter and darker blacks, there are lighter and
darker whites. Irish, Italians, and Greeks are considered white, so I
ask you again, how is denigrating them white supremacy?
FPP
2018-01-14 22:13:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ed Stasiak
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous
and safe country, why the hell would they choose to allow their
country to be flooded with those from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed. Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then. So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country. And the filthy Italians. And
the filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy
?!?!? The Irish, Italians, and Greeks are white. How is denigrating
them white supremacy?
And why do capitalize 'white supremacy'? Do you respect it that much?
I find Trump has turned the phrase "White Supremacy" into a bona fide
movement that deserves a proper title.
They all came from what Trump would have called shithole countries. And
Italians and Greeks both have segments of their population that are
darker - usually described as "swarthy".
Just as there are lighter and darker blacks, there are lighter and
darker whites. Irish, Italians, and Greeks are considered white, so I
ask you again, how is denigrating them white supremacy?
And I'll tell you again. Trump has exhibited a pattern of racist
comments and actions.
He said everybody from Haiti had aids. Not Ireland... Haiti.
He said once here, Nigerians never go back to their huts. Not Italians,
but Nigerians.

Well, clown... how is that not denigrating and clearly white supremacy?
Do you need more examples that Trumpwise the Lying Clown is a racist?
Well, I'm glad you asked! Boy Howdy, am I glad you asked!

1973: The US Department of Justice — under the Nixon administration, out
of all administrations — sued the Trump Management Corporation for
violating the Fair Housing Act. Federal officials found evidence that
Trump had refused to rent to black tenants and lied to black applicants
about whether apartments were available, among other accusations.

1980s: Kip Brown, a former employee at Trump's Castle, accused another
one of Trump's businesses of discrimination. "When Donald and Ivana came
to the casino, the bosses would order all the black people off the
floor," Brown said. "It was the eighties, I was a teenager, but I
remember it: They put us all in the back."

1989: In a controversial case that’s been characterized as a modern-day
lynching, four black teenagers and one Latino teenager — the "Central
Park Five" — were accused of attacking and raping a jogger in New York
City. Trump immediately took charge in the case, running an ad in local
papers demanding, "BRING BACK THE DEATH PENALTY. BRING BACK OUR POLICE!"
The teens’ convictions were later vacated after they spent seven to 13
years in prison, and the city paid $41 million in a settlement to the
teens. But Trump in October 2016 said he still believes they’re guilty,
despite the DNA evidence to the contrary.

1991: A book by John O’Donnell, former president of Trump Plaza Hotel
and Casino in Atlantic City, quoted Trump’s criticism of a black
accountant: "Black guys counting my money! I hate it. The only kind of
people I want counting my money are short guys that wear yarmulkes every
day. … I think that the guy is lazy. And it’s probably not his fault,
because laziness is a trait in blacks. It really is, I believe that.
It’s not anything they can control." Trump at first denied the remarks,
but later said in a 1997 Playboy interview that "the stuff O’Donnell
wrote about me is probably true."

1992: The Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino had to pay a $200,000 fine
because it transferred black and women dealers off tables to accommodate
a big-time gambler’s prejudices.

2000: In opposition to a casino proposed by the St. Regis Mohawk tribe,
which he saw as a financial threat to his casinos in Atlantic City,
Trump secretly ran a series of ads suggesting the tribe had a "record of
criminal activity [that] is well documented."

2004: In season two of The Apprentice, Trump fired Kevin Allen, a black
contestant, for being overeducated. "You're an unbelievably talented guy
in terms of education, and you haven’t done anything," Trump said on the
show. "At some point you have to say, ‘That’s enough.’"

2005: Trump publicly pitched what was essentially The Apprentice: White
People vs. Black People. He said he "wasn't particularly happy" with the
most recent season of his show, so he was considering "an idea that is
fairly controversial — creating a team of successful African Americans
versus a team of successful whites. Whether people like that idea or
not, it is somewhat reflective of our very vicious world."

2010: In 2010, there was a huge national controversy over the "Ground
Zero Mosque" — a proposal to build a Muslim community center in Lower
Manhattan, near the site of the 9/11 attacks. Trump opposed the project,
calling it "insensitive," and offered to buy out one of the investors in
the project. On The Late Show With David Letterman, Trump argued,
referring to Muslims, "Well, somebody’s blowing us up. Somebody’s
blowing up buildings, and somebody’s doing lots of bad stuff."

2011: Trump played a big role in pushing false rumors that Obama — the
country’s first black president — was not born in the US. He even sent
investigators to Hawaii to look into Obama's birth certificate. Obama
later released his birth certificate, calling Trump a "carnival barker."

2011: While Trump suggested that Obama wasn’t born in the US, he also
argued that maybe Obama wasn’t a good enough student to have gotten into
Columbia or Harvard Law School, and demanded Obama release his
university transcripts. Trump claimed, "I heard he was a terrible
student. Terrible. How does a bad student go to Columbia and then to
Harvard?"

Hey, Matlock... I thought a legal axiom was that a lawyer never asks a
question they don't already KNOW the answer to?

Any more stupid questions, clownselor (sic)?
--
"Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination Thursday July 22nd."
"ISIS claimed responsibility". - J. P. Shanley
BTR1701
2018-01-14 23:25:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous
and safe country, why the hell would they choose to allow their
country to be flooded with those from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the
Irish before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed. Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then. So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country. And the filthy Italians. And
the filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy
?!?!? The Irish, Italians, and Greeks are white. How is denigrating
them white supremacy?
And why do capitalize 'white supremacy'? Do you respect it that much?
I find Trump has turned the phrase "White Supremacy" into a bona fide
movement that deserves a proper title.
They all came from what Trump would have called shithole countries. And
Italians and Greeks both have segments of their population that are
darker - usually described as "swarthy".
Just as there are lighter and darker blacks, there are lighter and
darker whites. Irish, Italians, and Greeks are considered white, so I
ask you again, how is denigrating them white supremacy?
And I'll tell you again. Trump has exhibited a pattern of racist
comments and actions.
Great and Tosca is an opera in three acts by Giacomo Puccini.

Both are equally relevant to the question I asked you.

Again: Irish, Italians, and Greeks are considered white, so I ask you
again, how is denigrating them white supremacy, as you claimed?
FPP
2018-01-15 07:01:44 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous
and safe country, why the hell would they choose to allow their
country to be flooded with those from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the
Irish before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed. Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then. So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country. And the filthy Italians. And
the filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy
?!?!? The Irish, Italians, and Greeks are white. How is denigrating
them white supremacy?
And why do capitalize 'white supremacy'? Do you respect it that much?
I find Trump has turned the phrase "White Supremacy" into a bona fide
movement that deserves a proper title.
They all came from what Trump would have called shithole countries. And
Italians and Greeks both have segments of their population that are
darker - usually described as "swarthy".
Just as there are lighter and darker blacks, there are lighter and
darker whites. Irish, Italians, and Greeks are considered white, so I
ask you again, how is denigrating them white supremacy?
And I'll tell you again. Trump has exhibited a pattern of racist
comments and actions.
Great and Tosca is an opera in three acts by Giacomo Puccini.
Both are equally relevant to the question I asked you.
Again: Irish, Italians, and Greeks are considered white, so I ask you
again, how is denigrating them white supremacy, as you claimed?
So you're asking for ANOTHER history lesson, are we? Always glad to
oblige the historically ignorant.

To white supremacists, Italians aren't acceptably white. Neither are
Greeks, Jews, or Poles.
Post by BTR1701
Who, exactly, is white?
The answer sounds obvious — we know a white person when we see one, we think. But when Italians poured into America in the late 1800s and early 1900s, they were not considered white upon arrival. A century later, though, when Teresa Giudice of The Real Housewives of New Jersey maniacally hoisted a table on national television, she did not do so as a member of a supposedly inferior people. No, she was a crazy white lady throwing furniture.
The story of how European immigrants during that era became white enlightens us on our current political realities. Italians, Greeks, Poles, Hungarians, Slavs and other European groups, at the time called “new immigrants,” sought to overcome their subordination by showing, through their behavior, to be deserving of being considered white.
Get it? Or do you need more convincing?

https://theundefeated.com/features/white-immigrants-werent-always-considered-white-and-acceptable/

So I'll tell you. Again. Trump is a racist, who is supported by white
supremacists for exactly the reasons I've outlined.

Again. Now... do you need any further educating? Or can you figure it
out for yourself, from this point on?
--
"Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination Thursday July 22nd."
"ISIS claimed responsibility". - J. P. Shanley
trotsky
2018-01-15 10:46:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous
and safe country, why the hell would they choose to allow their
country to be flooded with those from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the
Irish before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed. Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then. So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country. And the filthy Italians. And
the filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy
?!?!? The Irish, Italians, and Greeks are white. How is denigrating
them white supremacy?
And why do capitalize 'white supremacy'? Do you respect it that much?
I find Trump has turned the phrase "White Supremacy" into a bona fide
movement that deserves a proper title.
They all came from what Trump would have called shithole countries. And
Italians and Greeks both have segments of their population that are
darker - usually described as "swarthy".
Just as there are lighter and darker blacks, there are lighter and
darker whites. Irish, Italians, and Greeks are considered white, so I
ask you again, how is denigrating them white supremacy?
And I'll tell you again.  Trump has exhibited a pattern of racist
comments and actions.
Great and Tosca is an opera in three acts by Giacomo Puccini.
Both are equally relevant to the question I asked you.
The closest Thanny ever came to a night at the opera was the Queen
album. Or the Marx Brothers.
BTR1701
2018-01-15 18:11:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous
and safe country, why the hell would they choose to allow their
country to be flooded with those from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the
Irish before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed. Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then. So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country. And the filthy Italians. And
the filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy
?!?!? The Irish, Italians, and Greeks are white. How is denigrating
them white supremacy?
And why do capitalize 'white supremacy'? Do you respect it that much?
I find Trump has turned the phrase "White Supremacy" into a bona fide
movement that deserves a proper title.
They all came from what Trump would have called shithole countries. And
Italians and Greeks both have segments of their population that are
darker - usually described as "swarthy".
Just as there are lighter and darker blacks, there are lighter and
darker whites. Irish, Italians, and Greeks are considered white, so I
ask you again, how is denigrating them white supremacy?
And I'll tell you again. Trump has exhibited a pattern of racist
comments and actions.
Great and Tosca is an opera in three acts by Giacomo Puccini.
Both are equally relevant to the question I asked you.
Again: Irish, Italians, and Greeks are considered white, so I ask you
again, how is denigrating them white supremacy, as you claimed?
So you're asking for ANOTHER history lesson, are we? Always glad to
oblige the historically ignorant.
To white supremacists, Italians aren't acceptably white. Neither are
Greeks, Jews, or Poles.
Get it? Or do you need more convincing?
Spin it all you like, but nonsense from the 1800s doesn't somehow make
someone who disparages white people in 2018 a 'white supremacist'.
FPP
2018-01-16 00:32:30 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous
and safe country, why the hell would they choose to allow their
country to be flooded with those from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the
Irish before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed. Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then. So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country. And the filthy Italians. And
the filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy
?!?!? The Irish, Italians, and Greeks are white. How is denigrating
them white supremacy?
And why do capitalize 'white supremacy'? Do you respect it that much?
I find Trump has turned the phrase "White Supremacy" into a bona fide
movement that deserves a proper title.
They all came from what Trump would have called shithole countries. And
Italians and Greeks both have segments of their population that are
darker - usually described as "swarthy".
Just as there are lighter and darker blacks, there are lighter and
darker whites. Irish, Italians, and Greeks are considered white, so I
ask you again, how is denigrating them white supremacy?
And I'll tell you again. Trump has exhibited a pattern of racist
comments and actions.
Great and Tosca is an opera in three acts by Giacomo Puccini.
Both are equally relevant to the question I asked you.
Again: Irish, Italians, and Greeks are considered white, so I ask you
again, how is denigrating them white supremacy, as you claimed?
So you're asking for ANOTHER history lesson, are we? Always glad to
oblige the historically ignorant.
To white supremacists, Italians aren't acceptably white. Neither are
Greeks, Jews, or Poles.
Get it? Or do you need more convincing?
Spin it all you like, but nonsense from the 1800s doesn't somehow make
someone who disparages white people in 2018 a 'white supremacist'.
No... what he says in 2018 makes him a racist and a white supremacist.
There are no "very fine people" marching with swastikas.

And if you're marching next to somebody with a Nazi flag, YOU'RE not a
fine person, either.
--
So... Trumpcare dead, defeated. Flynn resigns, shamed. (Kellyanne)
ConJob marginalized. Giuliani, Christie vanish. This Milo (Yiannopoulos)
kid loses book, job. CPAC expels (Richard) Spencer. WHO's winning?
-Keith Olbermann
Ed Stasiak
2018-01-15 00:21:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
FPP
*snip irrelevancies*
They’re still shithole countries.
FPP
2018-01-15 07:02:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ed Stasiak
FPP
*snip irrelevancies*
They’re still shithole countries.
And, now, so are we.
--
"Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination Thursday July 22nd."
"ISIS claimed responsibility". - J. P. Shanley
BTR1701
2018-01-15 08:06:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by FPP
Post by Ed Stasiak
FPP
*snip irrelevancies*
They’re still shithole countries.
And, now, so are we.
Donald Trump's "shithole" comments are dreadful. I've spoken to many
immigrants who are so angry about those comments that they said they'd
leave America and go back to their native counties if they weren't such
shitholes.
FPP
2018-01-15 09:38:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by Ed Stasiak
FPP
*snip irrelevancies*
They’re still shithole countries.
And, now, so are we.
Donald Trump's "shithole" comments are dreadful. I've spoken to many
immigrants who are so angry about those comments that they said they'd
leave America and go back to their native counties if they weren't such
shitholes.
Give Trump another 3 years, and you just might be on to something.
We used to be the smart, influential country that determined the
direction the world was going to go in - and everyone else was relegated
to the status of follower.

Good to get all that off our backs. Why lead and reap the leader's
rewards when you can be the follower who gets the scraps that fall off
the table.

That's some weight to have to bear. Good riddance!
--
"Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination Thursday July 22nd."
"ISIS claimed responsibility". - J. P. Shanley
trotsky
2018-01-15 10:42:01 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by Ed Stasiak
FPP
*snip irrelevancies*
They’re still shithole countries.
And, now, so are we.
Donald Trump's "shithole" comments are dreadful. I've spoken to many
immigrants who are so angry about those comments that they said they'd
leave America and go back to their native counties if they weren't such
shitholes.
That's pretty funny, but doesn't exactly jive with your recommendation
of someone taking a stroll through East L.A. Any chance you can revise
your comments so you don't sound like you've been doing meth all night
with Stormy Daniels?
Adam H. Kerman
2018-01-15 16:31:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
FPP
*snip irrelevancies*
They're still shithole countries.
And, now, so are we.
Donald Trump's "shithole" comments are dreadful. I've spoken to many
immigrants who are so angry about those comments that they said they'd
leave America and go back to their native counties if they weren't such
shitholes.
My ancestors came from a country in Europe that the Russians, Prussians,
and Austrians had partitioned in 1795. The Russian army would arrive in
each shtetl and Polish settlement once a year or more to conscript the
12 year old boys, who would remain in the Russian army for 20 years,
if they lived so long. My grandfather (on my mother's side), age 12,
and his younger brother, age 8, traveled across Europe and eventually
made their way to Montreal, and from there, to Chicago.

Yeah. People emigrated because it was a shitholeski.
The Horny Goat
2018-01-17 04:13:25 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 16:31:04 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
Post by Adam H. Kerman
My ancestors came from a country in Europe that the Russians, Prussians,
and Austrians had partitioned in 1795. The Russian army would arrive in
each shtetl and Polish settlement once a year or more to conscript the
12 year old boys, who would remain in the Russian army for 20 years,
if they lived so long. My grandfather (on my mother's side), age 12,
and his younger brother, age 8, traveled across Europe and eventually
made their way to Montreal, and from there, to Chicago.
Yeah. People emigrated because it was a shitholeski.
My father in law emigrated from the eastern portion of that same
country in August 1939 - before the war the town had a population of
about 5000 - it has about 400 today.

I think his father made the right choice.
trotsky
2018-01-15 10:28:59 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ed Stasiak
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous
and safe country, why the hell would they choose to allow their
country to be flooded with those from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed. Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then. So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country. And the filthy Italians. And
the filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy
?!?!? The Irish, Italians, and Greeks are white. How is denigrating
them white supremacy?
And why do capitalize 'white supremacy'? Do you respect it that much?
I find Trump has turned the phrase "White Supremacy" into a bona fide
movement that deserves a proper title.
They all came from what Trump would have called shithole countries. And
Italians and Greeks both have segments of their population that are
darker - usually described as "swarthy".
Just as there are lighter and darker blacks, there are lighter and
darker whites. Irish, Italians, and Greeks are considered white, so I
ask you again, how is denigrating them white supremacy?
So you're saying the "good blacks" are the lighter ones?
trotsky
2018-01-15 10:22:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe
country, why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be
flooded with those from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish
before
them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed. Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then. So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those filthy
Irish into "our" country. And the filthy Italians. And the filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy
?!?!? The Irish, Italians, and Greeks are white. How is denigrating them
white supremacy?
And why do capitalize 'white supremacy'? Do you respect it that much?
I find Trump has turned the phrase "White Supremacy" into a bona fide
movement that deserves a proper title.
There's some symmetry there, then since Thanny's posts frequently sound
like a bowel movement.
Ed Stasiak
2018-01-14 03:55:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by FPP
FPP
Ed Stasiak
No, they were European.
Make America White Again.
Should it be “Make America Mexican”?

Why should America and the West take in anybody and everybody simply because
they want to live here, and then hand them a whole raft of welfare benefits when they
arrive (that the Italians, Irish and other Europeans didn’t get)?

If we’ve got to give immigrants welfare to live here, then it’s WE who can’t afford it…
FPP
2018-01-14 13:19:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
Ed Stasiak
No, they were European.
Make America White Again.
Should it be “Make America Mexican”?
Why do you continually ask such stunningly stupid questions?
Post by Ed Stasiak
Why should America and the West take in anybody and everybody simply because
they want to live here, and then hand them a whole raft of welfare benefits when they
arrive (that the Italians, Irish and other Europeans didn’t get)?
Again... why do you continually ask such stunningly stupid questions?
--
"Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination Thursday July 22nd."
"ISIS claimed responsibility". - J. P. Shanley
Rhino
2018-01-15 21:52:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by FPP
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
Ed Stasiak
No, they were European.
Make America White Again.
Should it be “Make America Mexican”?
Why do you continually ask such stunningly stupid questions?
Post by Ed Stasiak
Why should America and the West take in anybody and everybody simply because
they want to live here, and then hand them a whole raft of welfare benefits when they
arrive (that the Italians, Irish and other Europeans didn’t get)?
Again... why do you continually ask such stunningly stupid questions?
Why do YOU keep failing to answer Ed's allegedly "stupid" questions?
--
Rhino
FPP
2018-01-16 00:36:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rhino
Post by FPP
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
Ed Stasiak
No, they were European.
Make America White Again.
Should it be “Make America Mexican”?
Why do you continually ask such stunningly stupid questions?
Post by Ed Stasiak
Why should America and the West take in anybody and everybody simply because
they want to live here, and then hand them a whole raft of welfare benefits when they
arrive (that the Italians, Irish and other Europeans didn’t get)?
Again... why do you continually ask such stunningly stupid questions?
Why do YOU keep failing to answer Ed's allegedly "stupid" questions?
Because a stupid question doesn't deserve an answer.

Nobody is handing "anybody and everybody" anything, Rhino. Immigrants
who come here are actually MORE educated that the average American.

Do you need to see proof for that, too? Sure you do!

Today’s newly arrived immigrants are the best-educated ever

Today's Newly Arrived Immigrants Are More Educated Than EverThe
immigrants who have recently come to the United States are the most
highly educated in history. A new Pew Research Center analysis of U.S.
Census Bureau data shows that 41% of immigrants arriving here in the
past five years had completed at least a bachelor’s degree. By
comparison, only 20% of newly arrived immigrants in 1970 were similarly
educated.

But newly arrived immigrants remain more likely than the U.S. born to
have earned a degree, and that gap is now at its biggest since 1970. In
that year, new arrivals had a 9-percentage-point advantage over
U.S.-born adults in the share completing a bachelor’s degree (20% versus
11%). That advantage narrowed to 6 points in 1990. But the advantage in
college completion held by recently arrived immigrants has since
widened, to about 12 points as of 2013 (41% versus 30%)

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/10/05/todays-newly-arrived-immigrants-are-the-best-educated-ever/
--
So... Trumpcare dead, defeated. Flynn resigns, shamed. (Kellyanne)
ConJob marginalized. Giuliani, Christie vanish. This Milo (Yiannopoulos)
kid loses book, job. CPAC expels (Richard) Spencer. WHO's winning?
-Keith Olbermann
Rhino
2018-01-15 21:45:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ed Stasiak
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed.  Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then.  So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those filthy
Irish into "our" country.   And the filthy Italians.  And the filthy
Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy - and we still have groups that advocate
it today.  They like to cover their faces with white hoods.
Make America White Again.  Funny... but I don't remember seeing that in
the Declaration, or the Constitution.
You're ridiculous. I have never heard anyone question the "whiteness" of
the Irish, the Italians or the Greeks. (I *have* heard ethnic slurs
against each of them but never heard of anyone implying that they were
"black" or "brown".) But you've just got to play the Race Card at every
opportunity, don't you? It's what you progs do....
--
Rhino
David Johnston
2018-01-15 22:28:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rhino
Post by Ed Stasiak
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed.  Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then.  So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country.   And the filthy Italians.  And the
filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy - and we still have groups that advocate
it today.  They like to cover their faces with white hoods.
Make America White Again.  Funny... but I don't remember seeing that
in the Declaration, or the Constitution.
You're ridiculous. I have never heard anyone question the "whiteness" of
the Irish, the Italians or the Greeks.
That could possibly be because you live in 2018 and not 1918 when they
were having racist riots against the Greeks in Toronto. The centennial
of that shining moment in Canadian history is coming up in August.
BTR1701
2018-01-16 00:32:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by David Johnston
Post by Rhino
Post by Ed Stasiak
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed.  Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then.  So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country.   And the filthy Italians.  And the
filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy - and we still have groups that advocate
it today.  They like to cover their faces with white hoods.
Make America White Again.  Funny... but I don't remember seeing that
in the Declaration, or the Constitution.
You're ridiculous. I have never heard anyone question the "whiteness" of
the Irish, the Italians or the Greeks.
That could possibly be because you live in 2018 and not 1918 when they
were having racist riots against the Greeks in Toronto. The centennial
of that shining moment in Canadian history is coming up in August.
What race did the Torontonians claim the Greeks were, if not white?
FPP
2018-01-16 00:44:59 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BTR1701
Post by David Johnston
Post by Rhino
Post by FPP
Post by Ed Stasiak
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed. Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then. So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country. And the filthy Italians. And the
filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy - and we still have groups that advocate
it today. They like to cover their faces with white hoods.
Make America White Again. Funny... but I don't remember seeing that
in the Declaration, or the Constitution.
You're ridiculous. I have never heard anyone question the "whiteness" of
the Irish, the Italians or the Greeks.
That could possibly be because you live in 2018 and not 1918 when they
were having racist riots against the Greeks in Toronto. The centennial
of that shining moment in Canadian history is coming up in August.
What race did the Torontonians claim the Greeks were, if not white?
Why did the have to claim any race? Not considering them the same as
"whites" doesn't mean they're characterized as anything else.

I would imagine they claimed they were Greek.
--
So... Trumpcare dead, defeated. Flynn resigns, shamed. (Kellyanne)
ConJob marginalized. Giuliani, Christie vanish. This Milo (Yiannopoulos)
kid loses book, job. CPAC expels (Richard) Spencer. WHO's winning?
-Keith Olbermann
BTR1701
2018-01-16 04:18:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by David Johnston
Post by Rhino
Post by FPP
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and
safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded
with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish
before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed. Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then. So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country. And the filthy Italians. And the
filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy - and we still have groups that advocate
it today. They like to cover their faces with white hoods.
Make America White Again. Funny... but I don't remember seeing that
in the Declaration, or the Constitution.
You're ridiculous. I have never heard anyone question the "whiteness" of
the Irish, the Italians or the Greeks.
That could possibly be because you live in 2018 and not 1918 when they
were having racist riots against the Greeks in Toronto. The centennial
of that shining moment in Canadian history is coming up in August.
What race did the Torontonians claim the Greeks were, if not white?
Why did the have to claim any race?
If they're saying they're not white, then they must have had something
else in mind.
FPP
2018-01-16 08:39:54 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by David Johnston
Post by Rhino
Post by FPP
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and
safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded
with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish
before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed. Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then. So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country. And the filthy Italians. And the
filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy - and we still have groups that advocate
it today. They like to cover their faces with white hoods.
Make America White Again. Funny... but I don't remember seeing that
in the Declaration, or the Constitution.
You're ridiculous. I have never heard anyone question the "whiteness" of
the Irish, the Italians or the Greeks.
That could possibly be because you live in 2018 and not 1918 when they
were having racist riots against the Greeks in Toronto. The centennial
of that shining moment in Canadian history is coming up in August.
What race did the Torontonians claim the Greeks were, if not white?
Why did the have to claim any race?
If they're saying they're not white, then they must have had something
else in mind.
Yes. And I've already told you once: Swarthy.
Do you KNOW what swarthy means?
Well, do you? Or do I have to define every other fucking word I type
for you?
--
"Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination Thursday July 22nd."
"ISIS claimed responsibility". - J. P. Shanley
BTR1701
2018-01-16 14:12:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by David Johnston
Post by Rhino
Post by FPP
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and
safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded
with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish
before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed. Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then. So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country. And the filthy Italians. And the
filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy - and we still have groups that advocate
it today. They like to cover their faces with white hoods.
Make America White Again. Funny... but I don't remember seeing that
in the Declaration, or the Constitution.
You're ridiculous. I have never heard anyone question the "whiteness" of
the Irish, the Italians or the Greeks.
That could possibly be because you live in 2018 and not 1918 when they
were having racist riots against the Greeks in Toronto. The centennial
of that shining moment in Canadian history is coming up in August.
What race did the Torontonians claim the Greeks were, if not white?
Why did the have to claim any race?
If they're saying they're not white, then they must have had something
else in mind.
Yes. And I've already told you once: Swarthy.
Ah, the infamous Swarthy race. White, Black, Polynesian and... Swarthy.
FPP
2018-01-16 22:52:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by David Johnston
Post by Rhino
Post by FPP
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and
safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded
with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish
before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed. Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then. So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country. And the filthy Italians. And the
filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy - and we still have groups that advocate
it today. They like to cover their faces with white hoods.
Make America White Again. Funny... but I don't remember seeing that
in the Declaration, or the Constitution.
You're ridiculous. I have never heard anyone question the "whiteness" of
the Irish, the Italians or the Greeks.
That could possibly be because you live in 2018 and not 1918 when they
were having racist riots against the Greeks in Toronto. The centennial
of that shining moment in Canadian history is coming up in August.
What race did the Torontonians claim the Greeks were, if not white?
Why did the have to claim any race?
If they're saying they're not white, then they must have had something
else in mind.
Yes. And I've already told you once: Swarthy.
Ah, the infamous Swarthy race. White, Black, Polynesian and... Swarthy.
I didn't say they were a race... I answered your question regarding
"then they must have had something else in mind."

Italians and Greeks were described as "swarthy". Otherwise known as
"dark skinned".
--
So... Trumpcare dead, defeated. Flynn resigns, shamed. (Kellyanne)
ConJob marginalized. Giuliani, Christie vanish. This Milo (Yiannopoulos)
kid loses book, job. CPAC expels (Richard) Spencer. WHO's winning?
-Keith Olbermann
Ed Stasiak
2018-01-16 17:07:49 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
FPP
BTR1701
If they're saying they're not white, then they must have had something
else in mind.
Yes.  And I've already told you once: Swarthy.
It wasn’t about skin color, (though that was also a factor) as can be seen
by the opposition to immigration by the lily white Irish, it was about culture
and some Americans back in the day were oppose to non-Western European
immigration and even opposed to non-Protestant British immigration.

This isn’t a case of either everybody is allowed to immigrate or nobody at all
can immigrate, it’s about maintaining our fundamentally European society
and there is nothing “racist” about that.
FPP
2018-01-16 22:54:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
BTR1701
If they're saying they're not white, then they must have had something
else in mind.
Yes. And I've already told you once: Swarthy.
It wasn’t about skin color, (though that was also a factor) as can be seen
by the opposition to immigration by the lily white Irish, it was about culture
and some Americans back in the day were oppose to non-Western European
immigration and even opposed to non-Protestant British immigration.
This isn’t a case of either everybody is allowed to immigrate or nobody at all
can immigrate, it’s about maintaining our fundamentally European society
and there is nothing “racist” about that.
It is 100% racist, Ed. It's actually the epitome of racist - wanting to
keep your culture pure European.

One group tried that back in the 40's... didn't work out well.
--
So... Trumpcare dead, defeated. Flynn resigns, shamed. (Kellyanne)
ConJob marginalized. Giuliani, Christie vanish. This Milo (Yiannopoulos)
kid loses book, job. CPAC expels (Richard) Spencer. WHO's winning?
-Keith Olbermann
Arc Michael
2018-01-16 23:43:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
FAg Poopoo {Poop} You always tell me your parents and you are fucking bigots and have power over people.
BTR1701
2018-01-17 17:11:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by FPP
This isn't a case of either everybody is allowed to immigrate or nobody at all
can immigrate, it’s about maintaining our fundamentally European society
and there is nothing "racist" about that.
It is 100% racist, Ed. It's actually the epitome of racist - wanting to
keep your culture pure European.
And yet you progs are absent in your condemnation of other countries whose
stated immigration policies and laws are about wanting to keep their
culture pure in the context of their own ethnicities.

No condemnation of Saudi Arabia for implementing a strict naturalization
policy that is purposely designed to keep the country not just Muslim but
Saudi Muslim, specifically.

No condemnation of Japan for implementing a strict naturalization policy
that is purposely designed to keep the country not just Asian, Japanese
Asian, specifically.

No condemnation of Mexico for implementing a strict naturalization policy
that is purposely designed to keep the country not just Latino but Mexican
Latino, specifically. (Mexico is particularly ironic in that it has the
strictest immigration laws in the Western Hemisphere, yet constantly tells
the US that doing anything to enforce our own borders is 'racist'.)

Apparently it's only the "epitome of racism" for white people to preserve
their culture. Everyone else can preserve away!
FPP
2018-01-16 22:56:44 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
BTR1701
If they're saying they're not white, then they must have had something
else in mind.
Yes. And I've already told you once: Swarthy.
It wasn’t about skin color, (though that was also a factor) as can be seen
by the opposition to immigration by the lily white Irish, it was about culture
and some Americans back in the day were oppose to non-Western European
immigration and even opposed to non-Protestant British immigration.
This isn’t a case of either everybody is allowed to immigrate or nobody at all
can immigrate, it’s about maintaining our fundamentally European society
and there is nothing “racist” about that.
So, no Asians, then. Or don't Asian Americans get to say who's an American?

No blacks, either... even though they were FORCED here by those lily
white Europeans.
--
So... Trumpcare dead, defeated. Flynn resigns, shamed. (Kellyanne)
ConJob marginalized. Giuliani, Christie vanish. This Milo (Yiannopoulos)
kid loses book, job. CPAC expels (Richard) Spencer. WHO's winning?
-Keith Olbermann
Ed Stasiak
2018-01-17 02:03:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
FPP
Ed Stasiak
This isn’t a case of either everybody is allowed to immigrate or nobody at all
can immigrate, it’s about maintaining our fundamentally European society
and there is nothing “racist” about that.
So, no Asians, then.  Or don't Asian Americans get to say who's an American?
No blacks, either... even though they were FORCED here by those lily white
Europeans.
Every nation has the right to control immigration how it sees fit and it’s not “racist”
for those people to want to maintain their unique culture and society, like Mexico
does for example;

http://humanevents.com/2006/05/08/mexicos-immigration-law-lets-try-it-here-at-home/

Mexico’s Immigration Law: Let’s Try It Here at Home

Mexico has a radical idea for a rational immigration policy that most Americans
would love. However, Mexican officials haven’t been sharing that idea with us
as they press for our Congress to adopt the McCain-Kennedy immigration reform
bill.

That’s too bad, because Mexico, which annually deports more illegal aliens than
the United States does, has much to teach us about how it handles the immigration
issue. Under Mexican law, it is a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.

At a time when the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American
law in line with foreign legal norms, it’s noteworthy that nobody has argued that
the U.S. look at how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us
about how best to solve our illegal immigration problem. Mexico has a single,
streamlined law that ensures that foreign visitors and immigrants are:

* in the country legally;
* have the means to sustain themselves economically;
* not destined to be burdens on society;
* of economic and social benefit to society;
* of good character and have no criminal records; and
* contributors to the general well-being of the nation.

The law also ensures that:

* immigration authorities have a record of each foreign visitor;
* foreign visitors do not violate their visa status;
* foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country’s internal politics;
* foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or deported;
* foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned or deported;
* those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison.

Who could disagree with such a law? It makes perfect sense. The Mexican constitution
strictly defines the rights of citizens — and the denial of many fundamental rights to
non-citizens, illegal and illegal. Under the constitution, the Ley General de Población,
or General Law on Population, spells out specifically the country’s immigration policy.

It is an interesting law — and one that should cause us all to ask, Why is our great
southern neighbor pushing us to water down our own immigration laws and policies,
when its own immigration restrictions are the toughest on the continent? If a felony is
a crime punishable by more than one year in prison, then Mexican law makes it a felony
to be an illegal alien in Mexico.

If the United States adopted such statutes, Mexico no doubt would denounce it as a
manifestation of American racism and bigotry. We looked at the immigration provisions
of the Mexican constitution. Now let’s look at Mexico’s main immigration law.

Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:

* Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their possibilities of contributing
to national progress.” (Article 32)
* Immigration officials must “ensure” that “immigrants will be useful elements for the
country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their
dependents. (Article 34)
* Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets “the equilibrium
of the national demographics,” when foreigners are deemed detrimental to “economic
or national interests,” when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country,
when they have broken Mexican laws, and when “they are not found to be physically
or mentally healthy.” (Article 37)
* The Secretary of Governance may “suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners
when he determines it to be in the national interest.” (Article 38)

Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:

* Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities
upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article 73)
* A National Population Registry keeps track of “every single individual who comprises
the population of the country,” and verifies each individual’s identity. (Articles 85 and 86)
* A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and
assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).

Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:

* Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116)
* Foreigners who sign government documents “with a signature that is false or different from
that which he normally uses” are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)

Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons:

* Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)
* Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without
authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)
* Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison
(Articles 119, 120 and 121).
* Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico — such as working
with out a permit — can also be imprisoned.

Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says,

* “A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five thousand pesos
will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally.” (Article 123)
* Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico instead of being
imprisoned. (Article 125)
* Foreigners who “attempt against national sovereignty or security” will be deported. (Article 126)

Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law:

* A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in the
country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)
* Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined.

All of the above runs contrary to what Mexican leaders are demanding of the United States.
The stark contrast between Mexico’s immigration practices versus its American immigration
preachings is telling. It gives a clear picture of the Mexican government’s agenda: to have a
one-way immigration relationship with the United States.

Let’s call Mexico’s bluff on its unwarranted interference in U.S. immigration policy. Let’s propose,
just to make a point, that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) member nations
standardize their immigration laws by using Mexico’s own law as a model.
FPP
2018-01-17 02:22:39 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
Ed Stasiak
This isn’t a case of either everybody is allowed to immigrate or nobody at all
can immigrate, it’s about maintaining our fundamentally European society
and there is nothing “racist” about that.
So, no Asians, then. Or don't Asian Americans get to say who's an American?
No blacks, either... even though they were FORCED here by those lily white
Europeans.
Every nation has the right to control immigration how it sees fit and it’s not “racist”
for those people to want to maintain their unique culture and society, like Mexico
does for example;
1) Yes every nation can control immigration as it wishes.
2) It's not racist to want to maintain one's own culture.
3) It is racist to want to restrict it to European cultures.

This isn't Mexico. And wanting to exclude certain immigrants from
certain countries because of the color of their skin is racist.

Saying all Haitians have aids is racist. Saying they won't go back to
their huts is racist.

Wanting to restrict immigration to only European immigrants is racist
too. And, more that that, it's fucking un-American.

Seems to me that if you like Mexico's approach to immigration, maybe
you'd like to adopt all of their other approaches too. The Mexican
Constitution stipulates similar rights, but also guarantees that
Mexicans have the right to a good job and decent housing.

The Mexican Constitution spells out the rights and duties of Mexican
citizens, and non-Mexicans residing in Mexico. Foreigners are forbidden
from getting mixed up in Mexican politics. Article 33 stipulates that
foreigners who violate this principle can be expelled from Mexico. (Even
Russians!)

Article 27 stipulates that all natural resources are the property of the
Mexican nation and Article 28 forbids monopolies with the exception of
government monopolies.

Sounds like Mexico has a few decent (socialist) ideas. Ready to give
them a shot, too, Ed?
--
So... Trumpcare dead, defeated. Flynn resigns, shamed. (Kellyanne)
ConJob marginalized. Giuliani, Christie vanish. This Milo (Yiannopoulos)
kid loses book, job. CPAC expels (Richard) Spencer. WHO's winning?
-Keith Olbermann
Ed Stasiak
2018-01-17 02:38:39 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by FPP
FPP
It's not racist to want to maintain one's own culture.
It is racist to want to restrict it to European cultures.
LOL! I don’t think you even bother reading what you write anymore…
moviePig
2018-01-17 03:11:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
It's not racist to want to maintain one's own culture.
It is racist to want to restrict it to European cultures.
LOL! I don’t think you even bother reading what you write anymore…
The first statement is pro-oneself. The second statement (assuming that
there are many European cultures) is anti-certain others.
--
- - - - - - - -
YOUR taste at work...
http://www.moviepig.com
FPP
2018-01-17 03:32:59 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by moviePig
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
It's not racist to want to maintain one's own culture.
It is racist to want to restrict it to European cultures.
LOL! I don’t think you even bother reading what you write anymore…
The first statement is pro-oneself. The second statement (assuming that
there are many European cultures) is anti-certain others.
Ed isn't reading for content. He's reading for affirmation.
--
So... Trumpcare dead, defeated. Flynn resigns, shamed. (Kellyanne)
ConJob marginalized. Giuliani, Christie vanish. This Milo (Yiannopoulos)
kid loses book, job. CPAC expels (Richard) Spencer. WHO's winning?
-Keith Olbermann
BTR1701
2018-01-17 17:11:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by moviePig
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
It's not racist to want to maintain one's own culture.
It is racist to want to restrict it to European cultures.
LOL! I don’t think you even bother reading what you write anymore…
The first statement is pro-oneself. The second statement (assuming that
there are many European cultures) is anti-certain others.
So if it's not racist to maintain one's own culture and one's own culture
is European, how is that accomplished in a non-racist manner under FPP's
logically contradictory standard?

FPP
2018-01-17 03:32:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
It's not racist to want to maintain one's own culture.
It is racist to want to restrict it to European cultures.
LOL! I don’t think you even bother reading what you write anymore…
Blacks have been here since our founding. They've always been a part of
our culture.
The first wave of Haitian immigrants came here at the turn the 19th
century, Ed.

They've been part of our culture since the beginning.
Asians have been here since the 1850's.

Where do you get the idea that only Europeans are part of our culture?
--
So... Trumpcare dead, defeated. Flynn resigns, shamed. (Kellyanne)
ConJob marginalized. Giuliani, Christie vanish. This Milo (Yiannopoulos)
kid loses book, job. CPAC expels (Richard) Spencer. WHO's winning?
-Keith Olbermann
BTR1701
2018-01-17 17:11:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by FPP
The Mexican Constitution spells out the rights and duties of Mexican
citizens, and non-Mexicans residing in Mexico. Foreigners are forbidden
from getting mixed up in Mexican politics. Article 33 stipulates that
foreigners who violate this principle can be expelled from Mexico.
And yet the Mexican government maintains offices in Washington DC and in
most states specifically to lobby (interfere with) our politics. And
imagine their howls of outrage if we were to round up all their citizens
who march in our streets and protest our government and boot them back home
for interfering in our politics.
trotsky
2018-01-16 09:43:37 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BTR1701
Post by David Johnston
Post by Rhino
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and
safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded
with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish
before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed.  Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then.  So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country.   And the filthy Italians.  And the
filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy - and we still have groups that advocate
it today.  They like to cover their faces with white hoods.
Make America White Again.  Funny... but I don't remember seeing that
in the Declaration, or the Constitution.
You're ridiculous. I have never heard anyone question the
"whiteness" of
the Irish, the Italians or the Greeks.
That could possibly be because you live in 2018 and not 1918 when they
were having racist riots against the Greeks in Toronto.  The centennial
of that shining moment in Canadian history is coming up in August.
What race did the Torontonians claim the Greeks were, if not white?
Why did the have to claim any race?   Not considering them the same as
"whites" doesn't mean they're characterized as anything else.
I would imagine they claimed they were Greek.
I think the Greeks invented the marathon, so that's a race they can lay
claim to.
suzeeq
2018-01-16 01:53:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BTR1701
Post by David Johnston
Post by Rhino
Post by FPP
Post by Ed Stasiak
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed. Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then. So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country. And the filthy Italians. And the
filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy - and we still have groups that advocate
it today. They like to cover their faces with white hoods.
Make America White Again. Funny... but I don't remember seeing that
in the Declaration, or the Constitution.
You're ridiculous. I have never heard anyone question the "whiteness" of
the Irish, the Italians or the Greeks.
That could possibly be because you live in 2018 and not 1918 when they
were having racist riots against the Greeks in Toronto. The centennial
of that shining moment in Canadian history is coming up in August.
What race did the Torontonians claim the Greeks were, if not white?
Dark.
David Johnston
2018-01-16 06:01:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BTR1701
Post by David Johnston
Post by Rhino
Post by Ed Stasiak
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed.  Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then.  So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country.   And the filthy Italians.  And the
filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy - and we still have groups that advocate
it today.  They like to cover their faces with white hoods.
Make America White Again.  Funny... but I don't remember seeing that
in the Declaration, or the Constitution.
You're ridiculous. I have never heard anyone question the "whiteness" of
the Irish, the Italians or the Greeks.
That could possibly be because you live in 2018 and not 1918 when they
were having racist riots against the Greeks in Toronto. The centennial
of that shining moment in Canadian history is coming up in August.
What race did the Torontonians claim the Greeks were, if not white?
Greek.
BTR1701
2018-01-16 14:11:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by David Johnston
Post by Rhino
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and
safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded
with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish
before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed.  Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then.  So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country.   And the filthy Italians.  And the
filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy - and we still have groups that advocate
it today.  They like to cover their faces with white hoods.
Make America White Again.  Funny... but I don't remember seeing that
in the Declaration, or the Constitution.
You're ridiculous. I have never heard anyone question the "whiteness" of
the Irish, the Italians or the Greeks.
That could possibly be because you live in 2018 and not 1918 when they
were having racist riots against the Greeks in Toronto. The centennial
of that shining moment in Canadian history is coming up in August.
What race did the Torontonians claim the Greeks were, if not white?
Greek.
Ah, the infamous Greek race.

White, black, Asian, Polynesian and... Greek.
David Johnston
2018-01-16 20:55:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by David Johnston
Post by Rhino
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and
safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded
with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish
before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed.  Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then.  So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country.   And the filthy Italians.  And the
filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy - and we still have groups that advocate
it today.  They like to cover their faces with white hoods.
Make America White Again.  Funny... but I don't remember seeing that
in the Declaration, or the Constitution.
You're ridiculous. I have never heard anyone question the "whiteness" of
the Irish, the Italians or the Greeks.
That could possibly be because you live in 2018 and not 1918 when they
were having racist riots against the Greeks in Toronto. The centennial
of that shining moment in Canadian history is coming up in August.
What race did the Torontonians claim the Greeks were, if not white?
Greek.
Ah, the infamous Greek race.
White, black, Asian, Polynesian and... Greek.
Also, Irish, Slav, Jewish et cetera. Don't imagine the racial lines you
draw were always there.

https://archive.org/details/indiaingreeceort00poco

(OK, he calls it the "Hellenic" race.)

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/29702922-the-jewish-race-in-ancient-and-roman-history?from_search=true

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/26429351-the-next-peace-congress-and-the-polish-question?from_search=true

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/621607.The_Story_of_the_Irish_Race
FPP
2018-01-16 22:50:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by David Johnston
Post by Rhino
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and
safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded
with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish
before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed. Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then. So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country.  And the filthy Italians. And the
filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy - and we still have groups that advocate
it today. They like to cover their faces with white hoods.
Make America White Again. Funny... but I don't remember seeing that
in the Declaration, or the Constitution.
You're ridiculous. I have never heard anyone question the "whiteness" of
the Irish, the Italians or the Greeks.
That could possibly be because you live in 2018 and not 1918 when they
were having racist riots against the Greeks in Toronto. The centennial
of that shining moment in Canadian history is coming up in August.
What race did the Torontonians claim the Greeks were, if not white?
Greek.
Ah, the infamous Greek race.
White, black, Asian, Polynesian and... Greek.
Hellenic, I think, actually.
--
So... Trumpcare dead, defeated. Flynn resigns, shamed. (Kellyanne)
ConJob marginalized. Giuliani, Christie vanish. This Milo (Yiannopoulos)
kid loses book, job. CPAC expels (Richard) Spencer. WHO's winning?
-Keith Olbermann
trotsky
2018-01-16 23:27:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by David Johnston
Post by Rhino
Post by Ed Stasiak
Post by FPP
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and
safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded
with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish
before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed.  Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then.  So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country.   And the filthy Italians.Â
And the
filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy - and we still have groups that advocate
it today.  They like to cover their faces with white hoods.
Make America White Again.  Funny... but I don't remember seeing that
in the Declaration, or the Constitution.
You're ridiculous. I have never heard anyone question the
"whiteness" of
the Irish, the Italians or the Greeks.
That could possibly be because you live in 2018 and not 1918 when they
were having racist riots against the Greeks in Toronto.  The
centennial
of that shining moment in Canadian history is coming up in August.
What race did the Torontonians claim the Greeks were, if not white?
Greek.
Ah, the infamous Greek race.
White, black, Asian, Polynesian and... Greek.
Hellenic, I think, actually.
Now ask him about Semites.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
FPP
2018-01-15 23:23:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rhino
Post by FPP
Post by Ed Stasiak
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed. Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then. So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country. And the filthy Italians. And the
filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy - and we still have groups that advocate
it today. They like to cover their faces with white hoods.
Make America White Again. Funny... but I don't remember seeing that
in the Declaration, or the Constitution.
You're ridiculous. I have never heard anyone question the "whiteness" of
the Irish, the Italians or the Greeks. (I *have* heard ethnic slurs
against each of them but never heard of anyone implying that they were
"black" or "brown".) But you've just got to play the Race Card at every
opportunity, don't you? It's what you progs do....
Read the fucking article I posted, then. Just because YOU haven't heard
of it, doesn't mean that it didn't happen, dummy.

https://theundefeated.com/features/white-immigrants-werent-always-considered-white-and-acceptable/

There were numerous instances where "No Italians Need Apply" signs and
ads were seen.

Loading Image...
--
"I call my own shots, largely based on an accumulation of data, and
everyone knows it. Some FAKE NEWS media, in order to marginalize, lies!"
-2017
"WAR IS PEACE." "FREEDOM IS SLAVERY." "IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH!" -1984
Eric Arthur Blair
trotsky
2018-01-16 09:47:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Rhino
Post by Ed Stasiak
FPP
Ed Stasiak
A better question to ask, is if someone lives in a prosperous and safe country,
why the hell would they choose to allow their country to be flooded with those
from shithole countries?
You mean like the Italians, back in the early 1900's, and the Irish before them?
No, they were European.
That's THE POINT, Ed.  Ireland was what racists like Trump would have
called "a shithole country" back then.  So was Italy.
So, according to your assessment, we never should have let those
filthy Irish into "our" country.   And the filthy Italians.  And the
filthy Greeks.
That's called White Supremacy - and we still have groups that advocate
it today.  They like to cover their faces with white hoods.
Make America White Again.  Funny... but I don't remember seeing that
in the Declaration, or the Constitution.
You're ridiculous. I have never heard anyone question the "whiteness" of
the Irish, the Italians or the Greeks. (I *have* heard ethnic slurs
against each of them but never heard of anyone implying that they were
"black" or "brown".) But you've just got to play the Race Card at every
opportunity, don't you? It's what you progs do....
Read the fucking article I posted, then.  Just because YOU haven't heard
of it, doesn't mean that it didn't happen, dummy.
https://theundefeated.com/features/white-immigrants-werent-always-considered-white-and-acceptable/
There were numerous instances where "No Italians Need Apply" signs and
ads were seen.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CWIgPByVEAAtKXj.jpg
I'd never seen that before. As usual, "progs" are full of facts and
cons are full of shit.
RichA
2018-01-13 02:06:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by David Johnston
<shrug> A American president who refers to any country as a shithole is
a moron regardless of its relative lack of prosperity. Dealing with
foreign nations is part of the responsibility of being president and
displaying his contempt for them is an ineffective way to do that.
What's more the question he was asked was stupid. If someone lives in a
prosperous and safe country, why the hell would they choose to leave it
and go to a place where their future would be much more uncertain and
somewhat more dangerous?
Screw diplomatic double-speak. Trump spoke for the majority of people. How is what you are proposing any different from someone who willfully ignores Third World problems?
David Johnston
2018-01-13 02:56:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by RichA
Post by David Johnston
<shrug> A American president who refers to any country as a shithole is
a moron regardless of its relative lack of prosperity. Dealing with
foreign nations is part of the responsibility of being president and
displaying his contempt for them is an ineffective way to do that.
What's more the question he was asked was stupid. If someone lives in a
prosperous and safe country, why the hell would they choose to leave it
and go to a place where their future would be much more uncertain and
somewhat more dangerous?
Screw diplomatic double-speak.
Spoken like a man who admires morons.
Your Name
2018-01-13 05:16:49 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Please name ONE black-run country that ISN'T a s---hole?
America ... well, it was "black-run" and not a "s---hole" until the
braindead, xenophobic, lunatic Trump the Chump took over, but now it is
not "black-run" and is fast becoming a "s---hole".
RichA
2018-01-13 06:01:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Your Name
Please name ONE black-run country that ISN'T a s---hole?
America ... well, it was "black-run" and not a "s---hole" until the
braindead, xenophobic, lunatic Trump the Chump took over, but now it is
not "black-run" and is fast becoming a "s---hole".
Obama couldn't run a lemonade stand. It is whites that run America. Want to see what happens when blacks get even a foothold? Take a look at Detroit.
Your Name
2018-01-13 06:04:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by RichA
Post by Your Name
Please name ONE black-run country that ISN'T a s---hole?
America ... well, it was "black-run" and not a "s---hole" until the
braindead, xenophobic, lunatic Trump the Chump took over, but now it is
not "black-run" and is fast becoming a "s---hole".
Obama couldn't run a lemonade stand. It is whites that run America.
Want to see what happens when blacks get even a foothold? Take a look
at Detroit.
Don't worry. Oprah will be in the job next and she'll fix all Trump the
Chump's disasters for you.
RichA
2018-01-13 06:18:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Your Name
Post by RichA
Post by Your Name
Please name ONE black-run country that ISN'T a s---hole?
America ... well, it was "black-run" and not a "s---hole" until the
braindead, xenophobic, lunatic Trump the Chump took over, but now it is
not "black-run" and is fast becoming a "s---hole".
Obama couldn't run a lemonade stand. It is whites that run America.
Want to see what happens when blacks get even a foothold? Take a look
at Detroit.
Don't worry. Oprah will be in the job next and she'll fix all Trump the
Chump's disasters for you.
Like the economy? Still waiting for the name of a country. C---.
trotsky
2018-01-13 13:03:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by RichA
Post by Your Name
Please name ONE black-run country that ISN'T a s---hole?
America ... well, it was "black-run" and not a "s---hole" until the
braindead, xenophobic, lunatic Trump the Chump took over, but now it is
not "black-run" and is fast becoming a "s---hole".
Obama couldn't run a lemonade stand. It is whites that run America. Want to see what happens when blacks get even a foothold? Take a look at Detroit.
No, let's look at Toronto. This article is from 2012, but at that time
Toronto's violent crime rate was forty percent higher than New York or
L.A. Before you talk about the U.S. get your shit together and
acknowledge what's going on in your own country you dumb fuck.

https://globalnews.ca/news/267663/crime-rates-in-the-largest-u-s-cities-how-does-toronto-compare/
Alan Smithee
2018-01-16 23:47:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Your Name
Please name ONE black-run country that ISN'T a s---hole?
America ... well, it was "black-run" and not a "s---hole" until the
braindead, xenophobic, lunatic Trump the Chump took over, but now it is
not "black-run" and is fast becoming a "s---hole".
Obama couldn't run a lemonade stand. It is whites that run America.
Does that include Hollywood?
ZZyXX
2018-01-13 05:05:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by RichA
Post by David Johnston
<shrug> A American president who refers to any country as a
shithole is a moron regardless of its relative lack of prosperity.
Dealing with foreign nations is part of the responsibility of being
president and displaying his contempt for them is an ineffective
way to do that. What's more the question he was asked was stupid.
If someone lives in a prosperous and safe country, why the hell
would they choose to leave it and go to a place where their future
would be much more uncertain and somewhat more dangerous?
Screw diplomatic double-speak. Trump spoke for the majority of
people. How is what you are proposing any different from someone who
willfully ignores Third World problems?
and yet the majority of Americans voted for Clinton
i***@gmail.com
2018-01-13 15:07:16 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by ZZyXX
Post by RichA
Post by David Johnston
<shrug> A American president who refers to any country as a
shithole is a moron regardless of its relative lack of prosperity.
Dealing with foreign nations is part of the responsibility of being
president and displaying his contempt for them is an ineffective
way to do that. What's more the question he was asked was stupid.
If someone lives in a prosperous and safe country, why the hell
would they choose to leave it and go to a place where their future
would be much more uncertain and somewhat more dangerous?
Screw diplomatic double-speak. Trump spoke for the majority of
people. How is what you are proposing any different from someone who
willfully ignores Third World problems?
and yet the majority of Americans voted for Clinton
*President Trump & the Republicans won, Hillary & the Democrats lost.
*President Trump beat Hillary 307 to 227 in Electoral College votes.
*President Trump beat Hillary 31 States to 19 States in the popular vote.
*Republicans now control the Whitehouse.
*Republicans now control the Senate.
*Republicans now control Congress.
*Republicans now control 36 of 50 State Governorships.
*Republicans now control two thirds of all State Legislatures.
*Republicans won more than 900 Legislative Seats from Democrats.
*President Trump’s new Justice is on the Supreme Court.

Irish Mike

Obama's legacy is President Trump
ZZyXX
2018-01-13 21:26:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by i***@gmail.com
Post by ZZyXX
Post by RichA
Post by David Johnston
<shrug> A American president who refers to any country as a
shithole is a moron regardless of its relative lack of prosperity.
Dealing with foreign nations is part of the responsibility of being
president and displaying his contempt for them is an ineffective
way to do that. What's more the question he was asked was stupid.
If someone lives in a prosperous and safe country, why the hell
would they choose to leave it and go to a place where their future
would be much more uncertain and somewhat more dangerous?
Screw diplomatic double-speak. Trump spoke for the majority of
people. How is what you are proposing any different from someone who
willfully ignores Third World problems?
and yet the majority of Americans voted for Clinton
*President Trump & the Republicans won, Hillary & the Democrats lost.
*President Trump beat Hillary 307 to 227 in Electoral College votes.
*President Trump beat Hillary 31 States to 19 States in the popular vote.
*Republicans now control the Whitehouse.
*Republicans now control the Senate.
*Republicans now control Congress.
*Republicans now control 36 of 50 State Governorships.
*Republicans now control two thirds of all State Legislatures.
*Republicans won more than 900 Legislative Seats from Democrats.
*President Trump’s new Justice is on the Supreme Court.
Irish Mike
Obama's legacy is President Trump
and yet the majority of voters voted for Hillary
FPP
2018-01-13 22:24:02 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by ZZyXX
Post by i***@gmail.com
Post by ZZyXX
Post by RichA
<shrug>  A American president who refers to any country as a
shithole is a moron regardless of its relative lack of prosperity.
Dealing with foreign nations is part of the responsibility of being
president and displaying his contempt for them is an ineffective
way to do that. What's more the question he was asked was stupid.
If someone lives in a prosperous and safe country, why the hell
would they choose to leave it and go to a place where their future
would be much more uncertain and somewhat more dangerous?
Screw diplomatic double-speak. Trump spoke for the majority of
people. How is what you are proposing any different from someone who
willfully ignores Third World problems?
and yet the majority of Americans voted for Clinton
*President Trump & the Republicans won, Hillary & the Democrats lost.
*President Trump beat Hillary 307 to 227 in Electoral College votes.
*President Trump beat Hillary 31 States to 19 States in the popular vote.
*Republicans now control the Whitehouse.
*Republicans now control the Senate.
*Republicans now control Congress.
*Republicans now control 36 of 50 State Governorships.
*Republicans now control two thirds of all State Legislatures.
*Republicans won more than 900 Legislative Seats from Democrats.
*President Trump’s new Justice is on the Supreme Court.
Irish Mike
Obama's legacy is President Trump
and yet the majority of voters voted for Hillary
Only if actual votes count.
--
"Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination Thursday July 22nd."
"ISIS claimed responsibility". - J. P. Shanley
ZZyXX
2018-01-14 19:51:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by FPP
Post by ZZyXX
Post by i***@gmail.com
Post by ZZyXX
Post by RichA
Post by David Johnston
<shrug> A American president who refers to any country as a
shithole is a moron regardless of its relative lack of prosperity.
Dealing with foreign nations is part of the responsibility of being
president and displaying his contempt for them is an ineffective
way to do that. What's more the question he was asked was stupid.
If someone lives in a prosperous and safe country, why the hell
would they choose to leave it and go to a place where their future
would be much more uncertain and somewhat more dangerous?
Screw diplomatic double-speak. Trump spoke for the majority of
people. How is what you are proposing any different from someone who
willfully ignores Third World problems?
and yet the majority of Americans voted for Clinton
*President Trump & the Republicans won, Hillary & the Democrats lost.
*President Trump beat Hillary 307 to 227 in Electoral College votes.
*President Trump beat Hillary 31 States to 19 States in the popular vote.
*Republicans now control the Whitehouse.
*Republicans now control the Senate.
*Republicans now control Congress.
*Republicans now control 36 of 50 State Governorships.
*Republicans now control two thirds of all State Legislatures.
*Republicans won more than 900 Legislative Seats from Democrats.
*President Trump’s new Justice is on the Supreme Court.
Irish Mike
Obama's legacy is President Trump
and yet the majority of voters voted for Hillary
Only if actual votes count.
of course they count, less people voted for trump than Hillary...despite
trump trying to ignore it, it is a fact
No Snowflakes
2018-01-13 22:59:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 13:26:15 -0800 LIttle Blue Snowflake ZZyXX ventured
Post by ZZyXX
and yet the majority of voters voted for Hillary
And irrelevant, as the US systems doesn't give a shit about you libturds
trying to run up the vote count.

This is EXACTLY WHY we HAVE the Electoral College!

Pretty smart for some guys 200+ years ago!
ZZyXX
2018-01-14 19:52:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by No Snowflakes
On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 13:26:15 -0800
Post by ZZyXX
and yet the majority of voters voted for Hillary
And irrelevant, as the US systems doesn't give a shit about you libturds
trying to run up the vote count.
This is EXACTLY WHY we HAVE the Electoral College!
Pretty smart for some guys 200+ years ago!
remember that in 2020
FPP
2018-01-14 22:16:31 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by ZZyXX
Post by No Snowflakes
On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 13:26:15 -0800
Post by ZZyXX
and yet the majority of voters voted for Hillary
And irrelevant, as the US systems doesn't give a shit about you libturds
trying to run up the vote count.
This is EXACTLY WHY we HAVE the Electoral College!
Pretty smart for some guys 200+ years ago!
remember that in 2020
Idiots don't know why we have an EC. Idiots only think they do.
--
"Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination Thursday July 22nd."
"ISIS claimed responsibility". - J. P. Shanley
ZZyXX
2018-01-15 20:44:35 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by FPP
Post by ZZyXX
Post by No Snowflakes
On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 13:26:15 -0800
Post by ZZyXX
and yet the majority of voters voted for Hillary
And irrelevant, as the US systems doesn't give a shit about you libturds
trying to run up the vote count.
This is EXACTLY WHY we HAVE the Electoral College!
Pretty smart for some guys 200+ years ago!
remember that in 2020
Idiots don't know why we have an EC. Idiots only think they do.
the EC has nothing to do with actual voting numbers. more people voted
for Hillary than trump...that is a fact
i***@gmail.com
2018-01-14 07:31:42 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by ZZyXX
Post by i***@gmail.com
Post by ZZyXX
Post by RichA
Post by David Johnston
<shrug> A American president who refers to any country as a
shithole is a moron regardless of its relative lack of prosperity.
Dealing with foreign nations is part of the responsibility of being
president and displaying his contempt for them is an ineffective
way to do that. What's more the question he was asked was stupid.
If someone lives in a prosperous and safe country, why the hell
would they choose to leave it and go to a place where their future
would be much more uncertain and somewhat more dangerous?
Screw diplomatic double-speak. Trump spoke for the majority of
people. How is what you are proposing any different from someone who
willfully ignores Third World problems?
and yet the majority of Americans voted for Clinton
*President Trump & the Republicans won, Hillary & the Democrats lost.
*President Trump beat Hillary 307 to 227 in Electoral College votes.
*President Trump beat Hillary 31 States to 19 States in the popular vote.
*Republicans now control the Whitehouse.
*Republicans now control the Senate.
*Republicans now control Congress.
*Republicans now control 36 of 50 State Governorships.
*Republicans now control two thirds of all State Legislatures.
*Republicans won more than 900 Legislative Seats from Democrats.
*President Trump’s new Justice is on the Supreme Court.
Irish Mike
Obama's legacy is President Trump
and yet the majority of voters voted for Hillary
LOL! And yet the Democrats have
thrown her under the bus and are trying to get as far
away from her and Slick Willie as possible.

But who knows. Maybe with your support she'll make another run in 2020.

Irish Mike

P.S. Here’s a beautiful little tune to help you cope with the next
seven years of a Republican administration.

FPP
2018-01-14 13:21:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by i***@gmail.com
Post by ZZyXX
Post by i***@gmail.com
Post by ZZyXX
Post by RichA
Post by David Johnston
<shrug> A American president who refers to any country as a
shithole is a moron regardless of its relative lack of prosperity.
Dealing with foreign nations is part of the responsibility of being
president and displaying his contempt for them is an ineffective
way to do that. What's more the question he was asked was stupid.
If someone lives in a prosperous and safe country, why the hell
would they choose to leave it and go to a place where their future
would be much more uncertain and somewhat more dangerous?
Screw diplomatic double-speak. Trump spoke for the majority of
people. How is what you are proposing any different from someone who
willfully ignores Third World problems?
and yet the majority of Americans voted for Clinton
*President Trump & the Republicans won, Hillary & the Democrats lost.
*President Trump beat Hillary 307 to 227 in Electoral College votes.
*President Trump beat Hillary 31 States to 19 States in the popular vote.
*Republicans now control the Whitehouse.
*Republicans now control the Senate.
*Republicans now control Congress.
*Republicans now control 36 of 50 State Governorships.
*Republicans now control two thirds of all State Legislatures.
*Republicans won more than 900 Legislative Seats from Democrats.
*President Trump’s new Justice is on the Supreme Court.
Irish Mike
Obama's legacy is President Trump
and yet the majority of voters voted for Hillary
LOL! And yet the Democrats have
thrown her under the bus and are trying to get as far
away from her and Slick Willie as possible.
But who knows. Maybe with your support she'll make another run in 2020.
Irish Mike
30 years of lies worked well for ya', huh?
Benghazi! (tm)

Not surprised a Fake Vet would rely on fake propaganda to win.
--
"Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination Thursday July 22nd."
"ISIS claimed responsibility". - J. P. Shanley
FPP
2018-01-13 22:23:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by i***@gmail.com
Irish Mike
... who Trump wouldn't have allowed into "our" country, since his people
would have come from a shithole country, like Ireland, where they
couldn't even feed their own people.

Maybe YOU should go back where you came from. It's what YOU (and your
deranged tyrant) want, after all.
--
"Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination Thursday July 22nd."
"ISIS claimed responsibility". - J. P. Shanley
Your Name
2018-01-14 01:25:50 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by FPP
Post by i***@gmail.com
Irish Mike
... who Trump wouldn't have allowed into "our" country, since his
people would have come from a shithole country, like Ireland, where
they couldn't even feed their own people.
Maybe YOU should go back where you came from. It's what YOU (and your
deranged tyrant) want, after all.
Trump the Chump's mother was from Scotland, so she shouldn't have been
allowed into America, and the he wouldn't have been born at all ... and
most people on the planet would be immensely gratefull ... so maybe
Trump the Chump has a point, but only if a time traveller can back-date
the policy to before his mother arrived in America.
trotsky
2018-01-13 10:55:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by RichA
Somalia? Nigeria? Malawi? Togo? Kenya? Uganda? (sorry, South Africa still relies mostly on WHITE intelligence to run most of it).
Interesting. Do you have a working definition for the ad hoc word
"shithole"? And if your country is a "shithole" can you tell me why
people *wouldn't* want to come to the U.S. from there? Keep in my mind
the syphilitic mentally diseased "President" asked "Why do you they want
to come here from these shitholes?" How fucked in the head do you have
to be to think that is a question that needs answering?

I know these are a lot of questions and you're a fucking moron like
Trump so we don't expect much in reply.
Breezy Kildare
2018-01-13 16:04:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by RichA
Somalia? Nigeria? Malawi? Togo? Kenya? Uganda? (sorry, South Africa still relies mostly on WHITE intelligence to run most of it).
After all the B.S. ... all the insults ... from all of your Limp Dick Liberal "Fans" here ... Not even ONE poster was able to name even ONE Black Ruled Country ... that wasn't a S-Hole! ... but now they all feel good about themselves ... for being such good little P.C. little boys!
m***@hotmail.com
2018-01-16 17:18:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Nigeria is the 21st largest economy in the world and had consistently been Africa's largest oil exporter, [but] its loadings have fallen below those of Angola several times over the past year.

(can't you cons look-up this stuff yourself)

-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nigeria
-- https://www.reuters.com/article/nigeria-oil/nigerias-crude-oil-exports-to-rise-in-may-loading-plans-idUSL5N1H55DQ
Loading...