Discussion:
Tubby Now in Deep Shit Over Stormy Fiasco
(too old to reply)
b***@gmail.com
2018-04-07 16:13:14 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
President Donald Trump said on Thursday he did not know about a $130,000 payment made to the adult film actress Stormy Daniels for her silence, his first public acknowledgment of the scandal surrounding an alleged sexual affair that has plagued him for months.
"No," a terse Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One when questioned about his knowledge of the payment, which was made by his private attorney Michael Cohen in the month before the 2016 election.
Michael Avenatti said Trump's remarks improved their legal standing.
"Our case just got that much better. And we very much look forward to testing the truthfulness of Mr. Trump's feigned lack of knowledge concerning the $130k payment as he stated on Air Force One," Avenatti said in a statement.
"As history teaches us, it is one thing to deceive the press and quite another to do so under oath," he said.
Further, Avenatti told CNN he plans to refile a motion to depose Trump and Cohen on Monday, the same motion that was rejected recently because a judge said it was "premature."
"Now it's not premature," Avenatti said, since the other side has since filed a motion to compel arbitration. "We will seek the deposition of Cohen and Trump."
https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/05/politics/donald-trump-stormy-daniels/index.html
Someone should tell Stormy and her "lawyer" that her 15 minutes are
up.
Can't do that. It wouldn't be true.
i***@gmail.com
2018-04-07 17:39:36 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
President Donald Trump said on Thursday he did not know about a $130,000 payment made to the adult film actress Stormy Daniels for her silence,
LOL! The left-wing hate-Trump zealots were hysterical with unbridled glee
as they anticipated the "Great Stormy Daniels Tidal Wave" they
predicted would capsize and sink President Trump! But, like their
Russia Collusion witch hunt, it sputtered into nothing.

President Trump's approval rating is at 51% which is higher than Obama's
at this point in his reign. This is not at all surprising but there is one
thing Democrats never saw coming; "The Slick Willie Clinton Factor".

Left wing Democrats never grasp the fact that they do not hold the
moral high ground when it comes to misconduct with women. In fact, between Ted Kennedy's Chappaquiddick (coming to a theater near you) debacle and Bill Clinton's myriad extra-marital affairs, most likely voters consider Democrats to be hypocrites in this area.

Donald Trump allegedly had a "sexual encounter" with adult porn star
Stormy Daniels in July, 2006. She also alleges that he paid her $130K in exchange for her agreement to keep quiet and not disclose it. She is now being managed by some wealthy left wing anti-Trump individuals who have offered her money go public with the story - which she has. She is also using the publicity to promote her new nationwide tour.

But put the story in perspective. A multi-billionaire businessman has a sexual encounter with an adult porn star. Certainly nothing to be proud of, but also not any kind of earth shattering event. Also, keep in mind this happened a decade before Donald Trump even announced that he was running for office.

Now, compare that to President Bill Clinton. President Clinton was caught getting blow jobs in the Oval Office from an Intern young enough to be his daughter. And that was after he was accused of forcible rape by Juanita Broaddrick and of sexual assault by Kathleen Willey, while he was the Governor of Arkansas.

You tell me which the bigger story is, and which is the greater betrayal of the trust of the American people that elected them to office.

BTW, I don't remember Democrats complaining or being outraged by President, and Governor, Clinton's behavior at the time.

Irish Mike
trotsky
2018-04-07 18:20:24 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by i***@gmail.com
President Donald Trump said on Thursday he did not know about a $130,000 payment made to the adult film actress Stormy Daniels for her silence,
LOL! The left-wing hate-Trump
Do you have to be "left wing"for hating a President who's known for
fucking porn stars out of wedlock? I thought adultery was a sin. Can
you get your fake anonyshit stupid ass to comment on this?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
m***@hotmail.com
2018-04-07 19:46:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by i***@gmail.com
President Donald Trump said on Thursday he did not know about a $130,000 payment made to the adult film actress Stormy Daniels for her silence,
LOL! The left-wing hate-Trump zealots were hysterical with unbridled glee
as they anticipated the "Great Stormy Daniels Tidal Wave" they
predicted would capsize and sink President Trump! But, like their
Russia Collusion witch hunt, it sputtered into nothing.
President Trump's approval rating is at 51%
Wrong. Its still at 42% (AP)
Post by i***@gmail.com
Left wing Democrats never grasp the fact that they do not hold the
moral high ground when it comes to misconduct with women. In fact, between
Ted Kennedy's Chappaquiddick (coming to a theater near you) debacle and Bill Clinton's
myriad extra-marital affairs
When did Clinton pay anyone off during a political campaign?
h***@bbs.cpcn.com
2018-04-07 19:54:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by i***@gmail.com
Now, compare that to President Bill Clinton. President Clinton was caught getting blow jobs in the Oval Office from an Intern young enough to be his daughter. And that was after he was accused of forcible rape by Juanita Broaddrick and of sexual assault by Kathleen Willey, while he was the Governor of Arkansas.
When Trump gets into trouble, the Republicans' standard solution is
to blame the Clintons!

Now they're even blaming Ted Kennedy, who has long since passed on.
m***@hotmail.com
2018-04-07 20:33:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by h***@bbs.cpcn.com
Post by i***@gmail.com
Now, compare that to President Bill Clinton. President Clinton was caught getting blow jobs in the Oval Office from an Intern young enough to be his daughter. And that was after he was accused of forcible rape by Juanita Broaddrick and of sexual assault by Kathleen Willey, while he was the Governor of Arkansas.
When Trump gets into trouble, the Republicans' standard solution is
to blame the Clintons!
Now they're even blaming Ted Kennedy, who has long since passed on.
Where was Nixon during all this Chappaquiddick noise?
The Horny Goat
2018-04-07 20:57:49 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by m***@hotmail.com
Post by h***@bbs.cpcn.com
When Trump gets into trouble, the Republicans' standard solution is
to blame the Clintons!
Now they're even blaming Ted Kennedy, who has long since passed on.
Where was Nixon during all this Chappaquiddick noise?
I was a teenager at that time - more politically interested than most
15 year olds as my grandfather had twice run for office. (Given it was
a strong district for the other side at that time it would have been a
colossal upset had he won either time but as local party chair he
concentrated on building the party in his area - and in 1974 his
successor in the district took the seat and held it for 20 years)

I seem to recall Tricky Dicky was mostly saying as little as possible
about the Democrats at that point mostly because (in my teenage
opinion) they were doing a better job of savaging other Democrats than
the GOP could!

In 1968 Nixon was mostly trying to rise above the fray playing the
"Heal the Country" card trying to heal the social agony that was
Vietnam on the one hand and a summer of assassinations on the other.

Until Watergate he did much better than everyone expected and in 1972
won one of the biggest landslides ever.(60% vs 37%) which even if the
'dirty tricks' had skewed the vote by 5% (which I strongly do not
believe) one wonders why he felt these were necessary - it was one of
the more one sided results in modern times.

After the murder of RFK (who after LBJ bowed out was thought to be the
#1 candidate) and the Dems narrow loss in 1968 the eastern Liberals
wanted Ted for 1972 but not after Chappaquiddick!
trotsky
2018-04-09 09:49:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by i***@gmail.com
BTW, I don't remember Democrats complaining or being outraged by President, and Governor, Clinton's behavior at the time.
Yes, the horribly liberal NYT is asking the same question:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/15/us/politics/bill-clinton-sexual-misconduct-debate.html

I'm confused, though, isn't only one party known as the "family values"
party? And if Clinton is analogous to Trump, who is analogous to Mark
Foley, Denny Hastert, and Larry Craig?

Hint: no one.
FPP
2018-04-10 00:07:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by i***@gmail.com
President Trump's approval rating is at 51% which is higher than Obama's
at this point in his reign.
Nope. It isn't.
Rustbucket Polling is Fox State Run TV polling.

The only polls that matter are on Election Day - and if you think the
special elections where Democrats have been outperforming their last
election numbers from anywhere from 11 pts to 28 points don't matter....

... well, good! The look on your face will be even more satisfying come
November.

RichA
2018-04-07 22:52:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
No one but liberal news editors cares about the story, or the whore.
trotsky
2018-04-08 09:33:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by RichA
No one but liberal news editors cares about the story, or the whore.
So the 22 million viewers that watched the 60 Minutes interview were
there by accident? You're a filthy fucking liar. You'd suck a dick if
you thought it help Trump, or even if it didn't.
RichA
2018-04-09 00:30:55 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by trotsky
Post by RichA
No one but liberal news editors cares about the story, or the whore.
So the 22 million viewers that watched the 60 Minutes interview were
there by accident? You're a filthy fucking liar. You'd suck a dick if
you thought it help Trump, or even if it didn't.
No one with a brain. It's "bread and circuses" for the idiot masses, designed to deflect from anything that actually impacts their lives.
trotsky
2018-04-09 09:45:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by RichA
Post by trotsky
Post by RichA
No one but liberal news editors cares about the story, or the whore.
So the 22 million viewers that watched the 60 Minutes interview were
there by accident? You're a filthy fucking liar. You'd suck a dick if
you thought it help Trump, or even if it didn't.
No one with a brain.
That leaves you out of the commentary, then.
b***@gmail.com
2018-04-09 10:43:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by RichA
Post by trotsky
Post by RichA
No one but liberal news editors cares about the story, or the whore.
So the 22 million viewers that watched the 60 Minutes interview were
there by accident? You're a filthy fucking liar. You'd suck a dick if
you thought it help Trump, or even if it didn't.
No one with a brain. It's "bread and circuses" for the idiot masses, designed to deflect from anything that
actually impacts their lives.
22 million people VOTE. Brain or no brain.
Ubiquitous
2018-04-08 00:32:23 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by b***@gmail.com
Can't do that. It wouldn't be true.
And you posted this off-topic article here because?
b***@gmail.com
2018-04-08 08:03:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by b***@gmail.com
Can't do that. It wouldn't be true.
And you posted this off-topic article here because?
Its CNN.
(as you full well know)
trotsky
2018-04-08 09:31:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by b***@gmail.com
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by b***@gmail.com
Can't do that. It wouldn't be true.
And you posted this off-topic article here because?
Its CNN.
(as you full well know)
His random response generator might have a virus. If he says you lost
the debate because you brought up CNN you'll know for sure.
b***@gmail.com
2018-04-08 15:19:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by trotsky
Post by b***@gmail.com
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by b***@gmail.com
Can't do that. It wouldn't be true.
And you posted this off-topic article here because?
Its CNN.
(as you full well know)
His random response generator might have a virus. If he says you lost
the debate because you brought up CNN you'll know for sure.
OK. I was thinking that he was the SOURCE of viruses.
trotsky
2018-04-08 09:34:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Ubiquitous
Post by b***@gmail.com
Can't do that. It wouldn't be true.
And you posted this off-topic article here because?
NOT TV RELATED
Loading...