Discussion:
Trump's Venezeula-Like Economic Nightmare - We Are Headed There Today!
Add Reply
Limbaugh Whisperer
2019-03-12 00:46:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Is it time for him to pay down the debt with higher taxes on his supporters
and massive cuts to the military industrial complex that is sapping the
strength out of the economy? His parasitic followers and the uber wealthy
who suck up to him are draining our country's blood.


Trump and the National Debt
Instead of Eliminating the Debt, Trump Will Add $8.3 Trillion

BY ***@WORLDMONEYWATCH.COM Updated February 15, 2019


During the 2016 presidential campaign, Republican candidate Donald Trump
promised he would eliminate the nation’s debt in eight years. Instead, his
budgets would add $8.3 trillion during that time. It would increase the
U.S. debt to $28 trillion.


Trump’s Two Strategies to Reduce the Debt
Candidate Trump had two strategies to reduce the U.S. debt. He promised to
grow the economy 6 percent annually to increase tax revenues. But once in
office, he lowered his growth estimate to 3.5 percent to 4 percent.


These projections are above the 2-3 percent healthy growth rate. When
growth is more than that, it creates inflation. Too much money chases too
few good business projects. Irrational exuberance grips investors. They
create a boom-bust cycle that ends in a recession. Trump’s Fiscal Year 2019
budget lowered annual growth rates down to between 2.4 percent and 2.9
percent annually.


Trump promised to achieve 4 percent growth with tax cuts. In his first 100
days, he released the outline of would become the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. It
cut the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent beginning in 2018.
The top individual income tax rate drops to 37 percent. It doubles the
standard deduction and eliminates personal exemptions. The corporate cuts
are permanent, while the individual changes expire at the end of 2025.

But Trump's tax cuts won't stimulate the economy enough to make up for lost
tax revenue. According to the Laffer curve, tax cuts only do that when the
rates were above 50 percent. It worked during the Reagan administration
because the highest tax rate was 90 percent.

Trump’s second strategy is to “eliminate waste and redundancy in federal
spending.” He demonstrated cost-consciousness in his campaign. He used his
Twitter account and rallies instead of expensive television ads. He
outlined his cost-cutting strategies in his book, "The Art of the Deal."

Trump was right that there is waste in federal spending. The problem isn't
finding it. Both Presidents Bush and Obama did that. The problem is in
cutting it. Each program has a constituency that lobbies Congress.
Eliminating these benefits loses voters and contributors. Congress will
agree to cut spending in someone else’s district, but not in their own.


Any president must cut into the biggest programs to make an impact on the
debt. More than two-thirds of government spending goes to obligations made
by previous Acts of Congress. Social Security benefits cost $1 trillion a
year, Medicare costs $625 billion, and Medicaid costs $412 billion. The
interest on the debt is $363 billion.


To lower the debt, military spending must also be cut. Obama spent $770
billion in FY 2017. Instead of cutting, Trump added $40 billion. In FY
2019, he asked for an additional $20 billion, taking total military
spending to $886 billion.


That leaves $1 trillion in the FY 2019 budget to pay for everything else.
That includes agencies that process the Social Security and other benefits.
It also includes the necessary functions performed by the Justice
Department and the Internal Revenue Service. You'd have to cut almost all
of it to eliminate the $985 billion national deficit. You can't reduce the
deficit or debt without major cuts to defense and mandated benefit
programs. Cutting waste isn't enough.

Trump’s Business Debt Influences His Approach to U.S. Debt
Trump has a cavalier attitude about the nation’s debt load. During the
campaign, he said the nation could "borrow knowing that if the economy
crashed, you could make a deal.” He added, “The United States will never
default because you can print the money."

Trump thinks about the national debt as he does personal debt. A 2016
Fortune magazine analysis revealed Trump's business is $1.11 billion in
debt. That includes $846 million owed on five properties. These include
Trump Tower, 40 Wall Street, and 1290 Avenue of the Americas in New York.
It also includes the Trump Hotel in Washington D.C. and 555 California
Street in San Francisco. But the income generated by these properties
easily pays their annual interest payment. In the business world, Trump's
debt is reasonable.

But sovereign debt is different. The World Bank compares countries based on
their total debt-to-gross domestic product ratio. It considers a country to
be in trouble if that ratio is greater than 77 percent. The U.S. ratio is
104 percent. That's the $21.516 trillion U.S. debt as of September 28,
2018, divided by the $20.658 trillion nominal GDP.

On February 11, 2019, the U.S. debt exceeded $22 trillion. The GDP estimate
for the fourth quarter of 2018 hasn't been published yet due to the
government shutdown. So we can't calculate an updated debt-to-GDP ratio
until it is released.

So far, this high ratio hasn't discouraged investors. America is the safest
economy in the world. It has the largest free market economy and its
currency is the world's reserve currency. Even during a U.S. economic
crisis, investors purchase U.S. Treasurys in a flight to safety. That's one
reason why interest rates plunged to 200-year lows after the financial
crisis. Those falling interest rates meant America's debt could increase,
but interest payments remained stable at around $266 billion.

But that changed in late 2016. Interest rates began rising as the economy
improved. As a result, interest on the nation's debt will double in four
years.

The United States also has a massive fixed pension expense and health
insurance costs. A business can renege on these benefits, ask for
bankruptcy, and weather the resultant lawsuits. A president and Congress
can't cut back those costs without losing their jobs at the next election.
As such, Trump's experience in handling business debt does not transfer to
managing the U.S. debt.

Trump is wrong to assume that the United States could simply print money to
pay off the debt. It would send the dollar into decline and create
hyperinflation. Interest rates would rise as creditors lost faith in U.S.
Treasurys. That would create a recession. He's also wrong in thinking that
he could make a deal with our lenders if the U.S. economy crashed. There
would be no lenders left. It would send the dollar into a collapse. The
entire world would plummet into another Great Depression.

National Debt Since Trump Took Office
At first, it seemed Trump was lowering the debt. It fell $102 billion in
the first six months after Trump took office. On January 20th, the day
Trump was inaugurated, the debt was $19.9 trillion. On July 30, it was
$19.8 trillion. But it was not because of anything he did. Instead, it was
because of the federal debt ceiling.

On September 8, 2017, Trump signed a bill increasing the debt ceiling.
Later that day, the debt exceeded $20 trillion for the first time in U.S.
history. On February 9, 2018, Trump signed a bill suspending the debt
ceiling until March 1, 2019. On March 15, 2018, the debt exceeded $21
trillion. The debt will continue to increase until the 2019 deadline. It
surpassed $22 trillion on February 11, 2019.

If so, Trump will have overseen the fastest dollar increase in the debt in
just three years

Trump's Fiscal Year 2019 budget projects the debt would increase $8.3
trillion during his first term. That's almost as much as Obama added in two
terms while fighting a recession. Trump has not fulfilled his campaign
promise to cut the debt. Instead, he's done the opposite.

How It Affects You
The national debt doesn't affect you directly until it reaches a tipping
point. A study by the World Bank found that if the debt-to-GDP ratio
exceeds 77 percent for an extended period of time, it slows economic
growth. Every percentage point of debt above this level costs the country
1.7 percent in economic growth.

The first sign of trouble is when interest rates start to rise
significantly. Investors need a higher return to offset the greater
perceived risk. They start to doubt that the debt can be paid off.

The second sign is that the U.S. dollar loses value. You will notice that
as inflation. Imported goods will cost more. Gas and grocery prices will
rise. Travel to other countries will also become much more expensive.

As interest rates and inflation rise, the cost of providing benefits and
paying the interest on the debt will skyrocket. That leaves less money for
other services. At that point, the government will be forced to cut
services or raise taxes. That will further slow economic growth. At that
point, continued deficit spending will no longer work.
RichA
2019-03-12 01:01:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Stock market:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets
RichA
2019-03-12 01:02:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
DOW

25,650.88
+200.64
+0.79%

NASDAQ Composite Index

7,558.06
+149.92
+2.02%

S&P 500

2,783.30
+40.23
+1.47%
trotsky
2019-03-12 01:11:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
DOW?25,650.88+200.64+0.79%NASDAQ Composite Index?7,558.06+149.92+2.02%S&P 500?2,783.30+40.23+1.47%
You seem to have forgotten one of the weakest jobs reports in
history last month. Why not grow a pair of balls and talk about
the facts for a change?
--
RichA
2019-03-12 01:17:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
DOW?25,650.88+200.64+0.79%NASDAQ Composite Index?7,558.06+149.92+2.02%S&P 500?2,783.30+40.23+1.47%
Yes, looks like unemployment might climb to...less historic lows.
trotsky
2019-03-14 10:37:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by RichA
Yes, looks like unemployment might climb to...less historic lows.
While wages are stagnant. How are wages in your country, buddy?


--
RichA
2019-03-14 22:38:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by trotsky
Post by RichA
Yes, looks like unemployment might climb to...less historic lows.
While wages are stagnant. How are wages in your country, buddy?
With states bumping up min wages to $15/hr from (in some cases) as low as $8, how can wages be "stagnant?"
NoBody
2019-03-15 11:23:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by RichA
Post by trotsky
Post by RichA
Yes, looks like unemployment might climb to...less historic lows.
While wages are stagnant. How are wages in your country, buddy?
With states bumping up min wages to $15/hr from (in some cases) as low as $8, how can wages be "stagnant?"
As soon as prices increase to match the change and hours worked drop,
people will be exactly where they were before the change. Of course,
the middle class, who will get no magic increases will lose their
buying power. Nice job libs!
NoBody
2019-03-16 14:48:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by RichA
Post by trotsky
Post by RichA
Yes, looks like unemployment might climb to...less historic lows.
While wages are stagnant. How are wages in your country, buddy?
With states bumping up min wages to $15/hr from (in some cases) as low as $8, how can wages be "stagnant?"
As soon as prices increase to match the change and hours worked drop,
people will be exactly where they were before the change. Of course,
the middle class, who will get no magic increases will lose their
buying power. Nice job libs!
<crickets.wav>

Loading...