Discussion:
Mail-In Voting
Add Reply
BTR1701
2024-03-28 01:41:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.

Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.

Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.

Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.

Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.

Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.

Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.

No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.

No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.

In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedes
to get instituted everywhere.
Adam H. Kerman
2024-03-28 02:02:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
If you're in the gulag do you still have to vote?
Post by BTR1701
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
All those democracies... I'm sure they'd love to vote out the Saud
family.
Post by BTR1701
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
Just because your pets got blank ballots in your state doesn't make it
poorly implemented everywhere else in the country. Republican party
officials are complete morons for NOT convincing their partisans to vote
by mail. It's votes in the bank!

Democrats don't get an advantage from mail-in voting.
shawn
2024-03-28 02:20:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:02:06 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Except if you live outside the country. Also everyone age 16 and older
is obligated to vote.
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by BTR1701
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
If you're in the gulag do you still have to vote?
Post by BTR1701
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
All those democracies... I'm sure they'd love to vote out the Saud
family.
Post by BTR1701
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
Just because your pets got blank ballots in your state doesn't make it
poorly implemented everywhere else in the country. Republican party
officials are complete morons for NOT convincing their partisans to vote
by mail. It's votes in the bank!
Democrats don't get an advantage from mail-in voting.
Your Name
2024-03-28 05:51:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by shawn
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:02:06 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Except if you live outside the country. Also everyone age 16 and older
is obligated to vote.
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by BTR1701
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
If you're in the gulag do you still have to vote?
Post by BTR1701
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
All those democracies... I'm sure they'd love to vote out the Saud
family.
Post by BTR1701
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their
damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Just because your pets got blank ballots in your state doesn't make it
poorly implemented everywhere else in the country. Republican party
officials are complete morons for NOT convincing their partisans to vote
by mail. It's votes in the bank!
Democrats don't get an advantage from mail-in voting.
In New Zealand there is mail-in voting for some 'lesser important
things', such as government referrendums on various, usually
ridiculous, topics.

For the election of government, mail-in voting is one option for
citizens overseas at the time, but those in New Zealand must visit a
voting station in person.

There is no e-voting system here either.
Ubiquitous
2024-03-28 08:30:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their
damnedestto get instituted everywhere.
Just because your pets got blank ballots in your state doesn't make it
poorly implemented everywhere else in the country. Republican party
officials are complete morons for NOT convincing their partisans to vote
by mail. It's votes in the bank!
No, mail-in voting is proven to be unreliable.
Post by Adam H. Kerman
Democrats don't get an advantage from mail-in voting.
TROLL-O-METER

5* 6* *7
4* *8
3* *9
2* *10
1* | *stuporous
0* -*- *catatonic
* |\ *comatose
* \ *clinical death
* \ *biological death
* _\/ *demonic apparition
* * *damned for all eternity


[Kerman's incorrect formatting fixed.]
trotsky
2024-03-28 09:53:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
I thought you were a "patriot?" You're saying we're no better than
France or Mexico? How fucked in the head are you dude?
trotsky
2024-03-28 09:55:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
P.S. it sure looks like a whole bunch of other European countries were
left off the list.
Ubiquitous
2024-03-28 08:30:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
After AlGore failed to steal the election in 2000, a committee on preventing
voter fraud determined that there mail-in voting was exceptionally vulnerable
to fraud.
Post by BTR1701
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their
damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Voter fraud is how Democrats win elections.

--
Let's go Brandon!
NoBody
2024-03-28 11:31:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
There is little to no need for mail in voting. Libs are for it
because it allows for nearly untraceable fraud.
trotsky
2024-03-28 12:11:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
There is little to no need for mail in voting. Libs are for it
because it allows for nearly untraceable fraud.
You prefer the traceable kind like the insurrection.
FPP
2024-03-28 14:21:55 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by trotsky
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
There is little to no need for mail in voting.  Libs are for it
because it allows for nearly untraceable fraud.
You prefer the traceable kind like the insurrection.
Now he's found something he likes about all the Middle Eastern countries
and Russia.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
trotsky
2024-03-28 16:17:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by FPP
Post by trotsky
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
There is little to no need for mail in voting.  Libs are for it
because it allows for nearly untraceable fraud.
You prefer the traceable kind like the insurrection.
Now he's found something he likes about all the Middle Eastern countries
and Russia.
I heard Pubie is planning on voting for Netanyahu by mail.
NoBody
2024-03-29 11:24:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by trotsky
Post by NoBody
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
There is little to no need for mail in voting. Libs are for it
because it allows for nearly untraceable fraud.
You prefer the traceable kind like the insurrection.
Analogy fail. Please try again.
trotsky
2024-03-29 11:55:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by NoBody
Post by trotsky
Post by NoBody
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
There is little to no need for mail in voting. Libs are for it
because it allows for nearly untraceable fraud.
You prefer the traceable kind like the insurrection.
Analogy fail. Please try again.
Intellectual bankruptcy as expected.
NoBody
2024-03-30 14:34:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by trotsky
Post by NoBody
Post by trotsky
Post by NoBody
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
There is little to no need for mail in voting. Libs are for it
because it allows for nearly untraceable fraud.
You prefer the traceable kind like the insurrection.
Analogy fail. Please try again.
Intellectual bankruptcy as expected.
Well yes, the analogy was intellectual bankruptcy. Glad you noticed.
FPP
2024-03-28 14:20:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
Because it's legal to vote by mail, and it works fine. No fraud, except
in diseased minds.

Eight states: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah,
Vermont and Washington and the District of Columbia—allow all elections
to be conducted entirely by mail.

So what?
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
Loading Image...

Gracie, age 6.
Loading Image...
trotsky
2024-03-28 16:16:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
Because it's legal to vote by mail, and it works fine.  No fraud, except
in diseased minds.
Eight states: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah,
Vermont and Washington and the District of Columbia—allow all elections
to be conducted entirely by mail.
So what?
I'm moderately amazed. Trump tried to coerce the Georgia SoS to find
"extra votes" for him and these stupid motherfuckers are talking about
voting by mail. If they don't have the fucking balls to talk about the
facts in evidence they should shut their fucking mouths.
FPP
2024-03-29 14:27:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
Because it's legal to vote by mail, and it works fine.  No fraud,
except in diseased minds.
Eight states: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah,
Vermont and Washington and the District of Columbia—allow all
elections to be conducted entirely by mail.
So what?
I'm moderately amazed.  Trump tried to coerce the Georgia SoS to find
"extra votes" for him and these stupid motherfuckers are talking about
voting by mail.  If they don't have the fucking balls to talk about the
facts in evidence they should shut their fucking mouths.
They're going to fucking lose again. Thanny is just laying the
groundwork for when he storms the capitol.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
trotsky
2024-03-29 17:56:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
Because it's legal to vote by mail, and it works fine.  No fraud,
except in diseased minds.
Eight states: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah,
Vermont and Washington and the District of Columbia—allow all
elections to be conducted entirely by mail.
So what?
I'm moderately amazed.  Trump tried to coerce the Georgia SoS to find
"extra votes" for him and these stupid motherfuckers are talking about
voting by mail.  If they don't have the fucking balls to talk about
the facts in evidence they should shut their fucking mouths.
They're going to fucking lose again.  Thanny is just laying the
groundwork for when he storms the capitol.
Without the Russian troll farms spewing disinformation like they did in
'16 I don't think Trump can win either.
super70s
2024-03-29 23:11:26 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
Because it's legal to vote by mail, and it works fine.  No fraud,
except in diseased minds.
Eight states: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah,
Vermont and Washington and the District of Columbia—allow all elections
to be conducted entirely by mail.
So what?
I'm moderately amazed.  Trump tried to coerce the Georgia SoS to find
"extra votes" for him and these stupid motherfuckers are talking about
voting by mail.  If they don't have the fucking balls to talk about the
facts in evidence they should shut their fucking mouths.
They're going to fucking lose again. Thanny is just laying the
groundwork for when he storms the capitol.
Trump has already said the only way he can lose is if the election is rigged.
suzeeq
2024-03-29 23:55:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by super70s
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
Because it's legal to vote by mail, and it works fine.  No fraud,
except in diseased minds.
Eight states: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah,
Vermont and Washington and the District of Columbia—allow all
elections to be conducted entirely by mail.
So what?
I'm moderately amazed.  Trump tried to coerce the Georgia SoS to find
"extra votes" for him and these stupid motherfuckers are talking
about voting by mail.  If they don't have the fucking balls to talk
about the facts in evidence they should shut their fucking mouths.
They're going to fucking lose again.  Thanny is just laying the
groundwork for when he storms the capitol.
Trump has already said the only way he can lose is if the election is rigged.
He said that 4 years ago too. But in spite of 60 lawsuits, and other
investigations, it couldn't be proved. The few instances of 'fraud' was
found to be by the Rs.
trotsky
2024-03-30 08:55:19 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by super70s
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
Because it's legal to vote by mail, and it works fine.  No fraud,
except in diseased minds.
Eight states: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah,
Vermont and Washington and the District of Columbia—allow all
elections to be conducted entirely by mail.
So what?
I'm moderately amazed.  Trump tried to coerce the Georgia SoS to find
"extra votes" for him and these stupid motherfuckers are talking
about voting by mail.  If they don't have the fucking balls to talk
about the facts in evidence they should shut their fucking mouths.
They're going to fucking lose again.  Thanny is just laying the
groundwork for when he storms the capitol.
Trump has already said the only way he can lose is if the election is rigged.
Which really means the only way he won once was when it was rigged. I
think the records on this will be sealed just like some of the stuff
aboukt JFK's assassination has never been released.
FPP
2024-03-28 14:48:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
and put it in a big wine jar?

Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling it
out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
it was received and accepted.

Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
trotsky
2024-03-28 16:20:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling it
out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
Hey do you think these putrid schmucks are trashing voting by mail
because Trump already put Louis DeJoy in place to trash the Post Office?
trotsky
2024-03-28 16:23:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by trotsky
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken
pottery, and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling
it out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you
can see it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
Hey do you think these putrid schmucks are trashing voting by mail
because Trump already put Louis DeJoy in place to trash the Post Office?
P.S. I wonder if this uber retards are trying to say instead of vote by
mail there should be vote by border crossing.,
BTR1701
2024-03-28 17:57:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling it
out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes. And
not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to somehow be
*losing* them.

How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
FPP
2024-03-29 14:28:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling it
out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes. And
not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to somehow be
*losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
BTR1701
2024-03-29 18:27:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling it
out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes. And
not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to somehow be
*losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?

If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
shawn
2024-03-29 19:27:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling it
out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes. And
not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to somehow be
*losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
BTR1701
2024-03-29 20:02:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling it
out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes. And
not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to somehow be
*losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
trotsky
2024-03-29 20:36:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling it
out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes. And
not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to somehow be
*losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate.
Is that what happened when Trump lost to Biden too? Go ahead, complete
the lie.


We didn't
Post by BTR1701
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
FPP
2024-03-30 16:40:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling it
out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes. And
not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to somehow be
*losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate.
Is that what happened when Trump lost to Biden too?  Go ahead, complete
the lie.
We didn't
Post by BTR1701
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
I always knew he couldn't read, but I wasn't sure he couldn't count.
Guess we know now.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
shawn
2024-03-29 21:14:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling it
out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes. And
not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to somehow be
*losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
Yet we keep running into this sort of thing:


Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES

Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
BTR1701
2024-03-29 21:43:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken
pottery, and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and
filling it out and putting it in the mail - and then track it
online so you can see it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the
others are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes.
And not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to
somehow be *losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.

The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
shawn
2024-03-30 00:39:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken
pottery, and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and
filling it out and putting it in the mail - and then track it
online so you can see it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the
others are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes.
And not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to
somehow be *losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
LOL. If those people are ever allowed to vote it will be because they
became citizens so there won't be any fraud committed by their voting.
BTR1701
2024-03-30 01:04:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce
the total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did
you count them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away
and reduce the total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at
the last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
LOL. If those people are ever allowed to vote it will be because they
became citizens so there won't be any fraud committed by their voting.
Right. That's Phase 2 of the Democrats' replacement plan.

STEP 1: Allow unchecked illegal immigration; let tens of millions of
people to flood across the border for as long as they can get away with
it.

STEP 2: Start demanding "a path to citizenship" for all the illegal
aliens because (1) we let so many in, it's impossible to deport them
all, and (2) it's not fair to force them to live "a life in the shadows"
in our society.

STEP 3: Voila! Millions of new Democrat voters.

They're not even hiding it. Dingbats like Alex Occasional-Cortex and
Cori Bush and Rashida Tlaib openly cheer what they call "the browning of
America" and push for illegal aliens to be given the right to vote while
at the same time screaming racism at anyone who notices what they're
doing and objects to it.
trotsky
2024-03-30 08:57:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce
the total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did
you count them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away
and reduce the total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at
the last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
LOL. If those people are ever allowed to vote it will be because they
became citizens so there won't be any fraud committed by their voting.
Right. That's Phase 2 of the Democrats' replacement plan.
If you don't have a cite for this can you just post a gif of your
pulling this out of your anus? TIA.
Post by BTR1701
STEP 1: Allow unchecked illegal immigration; let tens of millions of
people to flood across the border for as long as they can get away with
it.
STEP 2: Start demanding "a path to citizenship" for all the illegal
aliens because (1) we let so many in, it's impossible to deport them
all, and (2) it's not fair to force them to live "a life in the shadows"
in our society.
STEP 3: Voila! Millions of new Democrat voters.
They're not even hiding it. Dingbats like Alex Occasional-Cortex and
Cori Bush and Rashida Tlaib openly cheer what they call "the browning of
America" and push for illegal aliens to be given the right to vote while
at the same time screaming racism at anyone who notices what they're
doing and objects to it.
FPP
2024-03-30 16:42:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce
the total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did
you count them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away
and reduce the total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at
the last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
LOL. If those people are ever allowed to vote it will be because they
became citizens so there won't be any fraud committed by their voting.
Right. That's Phase 2 of the Democrats' replacement plan.
STEP 1: Allow unchecked illegal immigration; let tens of millions of
people to flood across the border for as long as they can get away with
it.
STEP 2: Start demanding "a path to citizenship" for all the illegal
aliens because (1) we let so many in, it's impossible to deport them
all, and (2) it's not fair to force them to live "a life in the shadows"
in our society.
STEP 3: Voila! Millions of new Democrat voters.
They're not even hiding it. Dingbats like Alex Occasional-Cortex and
Cori Bush and Rashida Tlaib openly cheer what they call "the browning of
America" and push for illegal aliens to be given the right to vote while
at the same time screaming racism at anyone who notices what they're
doing and objects to it.
Hey, you'd better polish up that tin-foil hat. They'll be coming to get
you soon.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
BTR1701
2024-03-30 21:03:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce
the total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did
you count them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away
and reduce the total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at
the last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
LOL. If those people are ever allowed to vote it will be because they
became citizens so there won't be any fraud committed by their voting.
Right. That's Phase 2 of the Democrats' replacement plan.
STEP 1: Allow unchecked illegal immigration; let tens of millions of
people to flood across the border for as long as they can get away with
it.
STEP 2: Start demanding "a path to citizenship" for all the illegal
aliens because (1) we let so many in, it's impossible to deport them
all, and (2) it's not fair to force them to live "a life in the shadows"
in our society.
STEP 3: Voila! Millions of new Democrat voters.
They're not even hiding it. Dingbats like Alex Occasional-Cortex and
Cori Bush and Rashida Tlaib openly cheer what they call "the browning of
America" and push for illegal aliens to be given the right to vote while
at the same time screaming racism at anyone who notices what they're
doing and objects to it.
Hey, you'd better polish up that tin-foil hat. They'll be coming to get
you soon.
Can't refute it so hurls ad hominems. That's our Effa!
trotsky
2024-03-31 08:43:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce
the total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did
you count them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away
and reduce the total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at
the last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
LOL. If those people are ever allowed to vote it will be because they
became citizens so there won't be any fraud committed by their voting.
Right. That's Phase 2 of the Democrats' replacement plan.
STEP 1: Allow unchecked illegal immigration; let tens of millions of
people to flood across the border for as long as they can get away with
it.
STEP 2: Start demanding "a path to citizenship" for all the illegal
aliens because (1) we let so many in, it's impossible to deport them
all, and (2) it's not fair to force them to live "a life in the shadows"
in our society.
STEP 3: Voila! Millions of new Democrat voters.
They're not even hiding it. Dingbats like Alex Occasional-Cortex and
Cori Bush and Rashida Tlaib openly cheer what they call "the browning of
America" and push for illegal aliens to be given the right to vote while
at the same time screaming racism at anyone who notices what they're
doing and objects to it.
Hey, you'd better polish up that tin-foil hat. They'll be coming to get
you soon.
Can't refute it so hurls ad hominems. That's our Effa!
Is "tin foil hat" very hurtful for you then? Is "Fucking Pussy" your
Oath Keeper name?
FPP
2024-03-31 13:28:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in
California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce
the total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did
you count them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away
and reduce the total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at
the last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
LOL. If those people are ever allowed to vote it will be because they
became citizens so there won't be any fraud committed by their voting.
Right. That's Phase 2 of the Democrats' replacement plan.
STEP 1: Allow unchecked illegal immigration; let tens of millions of
people to flood across the border for as long as they can get away with
it.
STEP 2: Start demanding "a path to citizenship" for all the illegal
aliens because (1) we let so many in, it's impossible to deport them
all, and (2) it's not fair to force them to live "a life in the shadows"
in our society.
STEP 3: Voila! Millions of new Democrat voters.
They're not even hiding it. Dingbats like Alex Occasional-Cortex and
Cori Bush and Rashida Tlaib openly cheer what they call "the browning of
America" and push for illegal aliens to be given the right to vote while
at the same time screaming racism at anyone who notices what they're
doing and objects to it.
Hey, you'd better polish up that tin-foil hat. They'll be coming to get
you soon.
Can't refute it so hurls ad hominems. That's our Effa!
Is "tin foil hat" very hurtful for you then?  Is "Fucking Pussy" your
Oath Keeper name?
His fee-fees are hurt.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
trotsky
2024-03-31 17:14:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce
the total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did
you count them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away
and reduce the total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at
the last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
LOL. If those people are ever allowed to vote it will be because they
became citizens so there won't be any fraud committed by their voting.
Right. That's Phase 2 of the Democrats' replacement plan.
STEP 1: Allow unchecked illegal immigration; let tens of millions of
people to flood across the border for as long as they can get away with
it.
STEP 2: Start demanding "a path to citizenship" for all the illegal
aliens because (1) we let so many in, it's impossible to deport them
all, and (2) it's not fair to force them to live "a life in the shadows"
in our society.
STEP 3: Voila! Millions of new Democrat voters.
They're not even hiding it. Dingbats like Alex Occasional-Cortex and
Cori Bush and Rashida Tlaib openly cheer what they call "the browning of
America" and push for illegal aliens to be given the right to vote while
at the same time screaming racism at anyone who notices what they're
doing and objects to it.
Hey, you'd better polish up that tin-foil hat. They'll be coming to get
you soon.
Can't refute it so hurls ad hominems. That's our Effa!
Is "tin foil hat" very hurtful for you then?  Is "Fucking Pussy" your
Oath Keeper name?
His fee-fees are hurt.
Pubie and Gayimator and Adam H. Verman will give him some solace.
trotsky
2024-03-31 09:01:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce
the total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did
you count them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away
and reduce the total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at
the last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
LOL. If those people are ever allowed to vote it will be because they
became citizens so there won't be any fraud committed by their voting.
Right. That's Phase 2 of the Democrats' replacement plan.
STEP 1: Allow unchecked illegal immigration; let tens of millions of
people to flood across the border for as long as they can get away with
it.
STEP 2: Start demanding "a path to citizenship" for all the illegal
aliens because (1) we let so many in, it's impossible to deport them
all, and (2) it's not fair to force them to live "a life in the shadows"
in our society.
STEP 3: Voila! Millions of new Democrat voters.
They're not even hiding it. Dingbats like Alex Occasional-Cortex and
Cori Bush and Rashida Tlaib openly cheer what they call "the browning of
America" and push for illegal aliens to be given the right to vote while
at the same time screaming racism at anyone who notices what they're
doing and objects to it.
Hey, you'd better polish up that tin-foil hat. They'll be coming to get
you soon.
Can't refute it so hurls ad hominems. That's our Effa!
Ad hominem (sic)? I just googled it and Google said it was true.
FPP
2024-03-31 13:27:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce
the total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did
you count them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away
and reduce the total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at
the last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
LOL. If those people are ever allowed to vote it will be because they
became citizens so there won't be any fraud committed by their voting.
Right. That's Phase 2 of the Democrats' replacement plan.
STEP 1: Allow unchecked illegal immigration; let tens of millions of
people to flood across the border for as long as they can get away with
it.
STEP 2: Start demanding "a path to citizenship" for all the illegal
aliens because (1) we let so many in, it's impossible to deport them
all, and (2) it's not fair to force them to live "a life in the shadows"
in our society.
STEP 3: Voila! Millions of new Democrat voters.
They're not even hiding it. Dingbats like Alex Occasional-Cortex and
Cori Bush and Rashida Tlaib openly cheer what they call "the browning of
America" and push for illegal aliens to be given the right to vote while
at the same time screaming racism at anyone who notices what they're
doing and objects to it.
Hey, you'd better polish up that tin-foil hat. They'll be coming to get
you soon.
Can't refute it so hurls ad hominems. That's our Effa!
Well, THAT'S rich!
Post by BTR1701
Hutt, you slouching pus-bucket
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
trotsky
2024-03-30 08:58:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken
pottery, and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and
filling it out and putting it in the mail - and then track it
online so you can see it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the
others are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes.
And not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to
somehow be *losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
And you have no verifiable proof of this either, right? Full on MAGA.
Post by BTR1701
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
FPP
2024-03-30 16:43:00 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken
pottery, and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and
filling it out and putting it in the mail - and then track it
online so you can see it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the
others are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes.
And not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to
somehow be *losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
And you have no verifiable proof of this either, right?  Full on MAGA.
Post by BTR1701
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Who needs proof? Thanny said it.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
trotsky
2024-03-30 20:22:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken
pottery, and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and
filling it out and putting it in the mail - and then track it
online so you can see it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the
others are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes.
And not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to
somehow be *losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
And you have no verifiable proof of this either, right?  Full on MAGA.
Post by BTR1701
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Who needs proof?  Thanny said it.
Probably just before he went online to buy a MAGA Bible.
FPP
2024-03-30 16:41:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken
pottery, and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and
filling it out and putting it in the mail - and then track it
online so you can see it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the
others are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes.
And not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to
somehow be *losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
moviePig
2024-03-30 17:07:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken
pottery, and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and
filling it out and putting it in the mail - and then track it
online so you can see it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the
others are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes.
And not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to
somehow be *losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Wait, weren't only eight of them illegal? Give the guy a break...
BTR1701
2024-03-30 21:00:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken
pottery, and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and
filling it out and putting it in the mail - and then track it
online so you can see it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the
others are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes.
And not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to
somehow be *losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
trotsky
2024-03-31 08:41:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken
pottery, and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and
filling it out and putting it in the mail - and then track it
online so you can see it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the
others are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes.
And not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to
somehow be *losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Did you forget to pull the proof out of your rectum again? Those are
just MAGA talking points and the "fact" is three lies: the number of
people, calling them illegal, and Biden "allowing" this. Lying is your
stock in trade now, thanks to your white supremacist compatriots I guess.
FPP
2024-03-31 13:30:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken
pottery, and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and
filling it out and putting it in the mail - and then track it
online so you can see it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the
others are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes.
And not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to
somehow be *losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then
periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Did you forget to pull the proof out of your rectum again?  Those are
just MAGA talking points and the "fact" is three lies: the number of
people, calling them illegal, and Biden "allowing" this.  Lying is your
stock in trade now, thanks to your white supremacist compatriots I guess.
Biden wants to add border agents, beef up security, beef up the legal
system to handle it.

And Republicans oppose it. Why? Because they don't want to fix the
border, they want to campaign on it.

Just like Thanny is doing.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
trotsky
2024-03-31 17:25:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken
pottery, and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and
filling it out and putting it in the mail - and then track it
online so you can see it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the
others are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes.
And not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to
somehow be *losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in
California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Did you forget to pull the proof out of your rectum again?  Those are
just MAGA talking points and the "fact" is three lies: the number of
people, calling them illegal, and Biden "allowing" this.  Lying is
your stock in trade now, thanks to your white supremacist compatriots
I guess.
Biden wants to add border agents, beef up security, beef up the legal
system to handle it.
And Republicans oppose it.  Why?  Because they don't want to fix the
border, they want to campaign on it.
Just like Thanny is doing.
That's the crux of it. It's boogie man politics. ""Troons" are out to
get you, "illegals" will murder you in your sleep, and frozen embryos
can register to vote. They alone can save us if we want America to be
"great" again and we're all "great patriots" which is why we're telling
you America is currently a giant piece of shit." One has to wonder at
the level of person it takes to buy into this fucking bullshit.
BTR1701
2024-03-31 19:58:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then
periodically checks in to see how you're doing, why would there
be less apples at the last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible
there's no way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We
didn't see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise.
Same with the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up.
Just like trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild
coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Biden wants to add border agents...
...to process illegals into the country more efficiently. Not to, you
know, patrol the border and keep people out.
beef up security...
...which he could do in one morning's work by rescinding his EOs. He
doesn't need any Republican help or cooperation. Weird that he won't do
that, huh?
beef up the legal system to handle it...
...and by 'handle it', he means more admin staff to help get the
illegals into America faster and more efficiently
And Republicans oppose it. Why?
Because it's a shit bill that not only does nothing to secure the border
but explicitly allows up to 8000 unvetted illegals into the country
every day.
trotsky
2024-03-31 20:46:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then
periodically checks in to see how you're doing, why would there
be less apples at the last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible
there's no way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We
didn't see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise.
Same with the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up.
Just like trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild
coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Biden wants to add border agents...
...to process illegals into the country more efficiently. Not to, you
know, patrol the border and keep people out.
beef up security...
...which he could do in one morning's work by rescinding his EOs. He
doesn't need any Republican help or cooperation. Weird that he won't do
that, huh?
beef up the legal system to handle it...
...and by 'handle it', he means more admin staff to help get the
illegals into America faster and more efficiently
I'm confused, are you trying to make a distinction between "illegals"
and people legally seeking asylum here, or are you too fucking stupid to
do such a thing?
Post by BTR1701
And Republicans oppose it. Why?
Because it's a shit bill that not only does nothing to secure the border
but explicitly allows up to 8000 unvetted illegals into the country
every day.
FPP
2024-04-01 14:24:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then
periodically checks in to see how you're doing, why would there
be less apples at the last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible
there's no way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We
didn't see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise.
Same with the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up.
Just like trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild
coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Biden wants to add border agents...
...to process illegals into the country more efficiently. Not to, you
know, patrol the border and keep people out.
beef up security...
...which he could do in one morning's work by rescinding his EOs. He
doesn't need any Republican help or cooperation. Weird that he won't do
that, huh?
beef up the legal system to handle it...
...and by 'handle it', he means more admin staff to help get the
illegals into America faster and more efficiently
And Republicans oppose it. Why?
Because it's a shit bill that not only does nothing to secure the border
but explicitly allows up to 8000 unvetted illegals into the country
every day.
Nope. It's a Republican Wish List bill. You fuckers wrote it
yourselves, and it's the strongest immigration bill and border security
bill in 50 years.

Stop lying about it. We all can read it for ourselves.
Fox Fucking News blasted Republicans.

Fox. Fucking. News. is calling you a liar, too.
Post by BTR1701
Fox News Blasts Republicans for Killing 'Strongest' Border Bill
Published Feb 15, 2024
The Chief Political Analyst at Fox News has criticized hardline Republicans for killing a border bill negotiated in the Senate.
"I think these are a couple of issues that put Republicans in peril of looking like literally a do-nothing Congress," Brit Hume told the station on Wednesday, referring to the border security bill shot down by the House and the potential rejection of funding for Ukraine.
The bill, released by senators on Sunday, would also make it harder to claim asylum at the border and expand detention facilities, among other efforts to reduce the number of migrants.
It was a bi-partisan bill crafted mostly by Republicans. And it was
like the Trump policy.
Post by BTR1701
The three main negotiators on the Senate bill — Republican Sen. James Lankford of Oklahoma, Independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut — have all pushed back on criticism of the bill. They emphasize that it would keep more people out instead of allowing more people to come in — and that migrants would not be able to apply for asylum at all if illegal border crossings reach certain numbers.
The policy is similar to one first used by Trump. Known as Title 42, it justified the quick expulsion of migrants from the country in the name of stopping the spread of COVID-19.
Lankford has repeatedly emphasized that the emergency authority “is not designed to let 5,000 people in, it is designed to close the border and turn 5,000 people around.”
After meeting with Republicans in the Capitol Monday evening, Lankford told reporters that people understand it once he explains it, “but it’s been said wrong so many times that people immediately just go back to, ‘this lets 5,000 people in a day,’ which is just factually wrong, but if you say it enough, it just sounds true.”
You are one shitty liar, you know that?
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
BTR1701
2024-04-01 19:50:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly
care about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Biden wants to add border agents...
...to process illegals into the country more efficiently. Not to, you
know, patrol the border and keep people out.
beef up security...
...which he could do in one morning's work by rescinding his EOs. He
doesn't need any Republican help or cooperation. Weird that he won't do
that, huh?
beef up the legal system to handle it...
...and by 'handle it', he means more admin staff to help get the
illegals into America faster and more efficiently
And Republicans oppose it. Why?
Because it's a shit bill that not only does nothing to secure the border
but explicitly allows up to 8000 unvetted illegals into the country
every day.
Nope. It's a Republican Wish List bill.
It may be a Republican Wish List but it's not anywhere near the wish
list of anyone who wants actual border security.

Republicans are shit on border security because they love illegal
immigration every bit as much as Democrats do, just for different
reasons.

So it's no surprise at all that a bill written by two parties that both
want the flow of illegals to continue is a shit bill that does nothing
for border security.
You fuckers wrote it
I had nothing to do with it.
yourselves, and it's the strongest immigration bill and border security
bill in 50 years.
Which ain't saying much.
Stop lying about it. We all can read it for ourselves.
Yes, I actually did read it. And it says exactly what I said it does.

(1) It increases funding for Border Patrol so that they can more
efficiently process illegals into the country, not keep them out.

(2) It allows the free flow of illegals to continue until illegal
entries exceed 8000 in one week or 5000 in one day, at which point the
president may close the border. Note: "may", not "must", which means Joe
Biden can keep doing what he's been doing all along and just let them
keep coming.

(3) Despite previous language in the bill implying it to be the case,
the bill doesn't *actually* close the border, even if this fraudulent
and arbitrary 5000-illegal threshold is reached. Per one of the bill's
co-authors, Senator Chris Murphy (D): "The bill contains a requirement
that the president funnel asylum claims to the land ports of entry when
more than 5000 people cross in a day." So the border never really
closes, the illegals are just funneled through the ports instead of
being allowed to swim across the river and walk into America everywhere.
Fox Fucking News blasted Republicans.
So what?
Fox. Fucking. News. is calling you a liar, too.
So what? Fox lies. You've gleefully pointed that out on many occasions.
Now you want to use them as a reliable source when it helps you get a
win on Usenet.

Don't think I didn't notice how you suddenly stop calling them Faux News
when you do a 180 and cite them to bolster your position.
Post by BTR1701
"I think these are a couple of issues that put Republicans in peril of
looking like literally a do-nothing Congress," Brit Hume told the station
I think Brit fundamentally underestimates how many people in this
country *want* a do-nothing Congress; how many of us feel Congress is at
its best when it's in recess and how readily we'd agree to pay them all
their full salaries to never show up at all.
Post by BTR1701
The three main negotiators on the Senate bill-- Republican Sen. James
Lankford of Oklahoma, Independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and
Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut-- have all pushed back on
criticism of the bill. They emphasize that it would keep more people out
instead of allowing more people to come in-- and that migrants would not be
able to apply for asylum at all if illegal border crossings reach certain
numbers.
Which contradicts the actual text of the bill they supposedly wrote.
(Which actually was written by their staffers and which they probably
haven't even actually read cover to cover, despite being its "authors".)
Post by BTR1701
Lankford has repeatedly emphasized that the emergency authority "is not
designed to let 5,000 people in, it is designed to close the border and
turn 5,000 people around".
Political double-talk. These people out-and-out lie to your face. Just
like the DHS Secretary, the White House spokeshole, and the president
himself have been blatantly lying for the last three years when they've
repeatedly stated without qualification that "the border is secure".

It's not secure. A 3-year-old can see it's not secure. But the
Gaslighter-in-Chief thinks if they just say it enough times, we'll stop
believing our lyin' eyes and take his dementia-addled word for it.

Here's a question: If the border is secure-- as Biden and all his people
have been insisting it is for three years-- why are they now saying it's
not secure because Republicans won't pass "the bill"? If they have
haven't been lying their asses off for three years, there should be no
need for this bill, right?

The bill clearly states that these 'emergency' provisions don't kick in
until there have been 5000 crossings in a 24-hour period. That means
5000 illegals have already gotten in before the provision is triggered.

And neither Fox nor any of these politicians bother to address how this
bill would actually *lessen* the already-minimal standards for allowing
illegals into the country. Right now, people applying for asylum need to
show "a significant possibility that they can establish a credible fear
of persecution on the basis of race, national origin, political beliefs,
etc." Not a high standard. It doesn't require them to provide any actual
evidence of their claims. Just say the magic words and make a claim,
which they've been coached to say and which they've rehearsed, and then
get into the country. But this border bill would lower that standard
even further, if that's possible, from a "significant" possibility of
persecution to merely a "reasonable" possibility of persecution. And
reasonable is just another way of saying 'plausible'. In other words,
it's a bar that anyone from anywhere can clear. There's no way that
anyone claiming asylum will ever get turned away if that's the standard.

This provision is designed to hamstring the immigration judges who have
been denying 95%+ of these fraudulent immigration claims and force them
to grant almost every one of them.
Post by BTR1701
After meeting with Republicans in the Capitol Monday evening, Lankford told
reporters that people understand it once he explains it, "but it's been
said wrong so many times that people immediately just go back to, 'this
lets 5,000 people in a day', which is just factually wrong
No, those of who have actually read the text know you're lying, Jimmy.
FPP
2024-04-01 21:29:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly
care about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Biden wants to add border agents...
...to process illegals into the country more efficiently. Not to, you
know, patrol the border and keep people out.
beef up security...
...which he could do in one morning's work by rescinding his EOs. He
doesn't need any Republican help or cooperation. Weird that he won't do
that, huh?
beef up the legal system to handle it...
...and by 'handle it', he means more admin staff to help get the
illegals into America faster and more efficiently
And Republicans oppose it. Why?
Because it's a shit bill that not only does nothing to secure the border
but explicitly allows up to 8000 unvetted illegals into the country
every day.
Nope. It's a Republican Wish List bill.
It may be a Republican Wish List but it's not anywhere near the wish
list of anyone who wants actual border security.
Republicans are shit on border security because they love illegal
immigration every bit as much as Democrats do, just for different
reasons.
So it's no surprise at all that a bill written by two parties that both
want the flow of illegals to continue is a shit bill that does nothing
for border security.
You fuckers wrote it
I had nothing to do with it.
yourselves, and it's the strongest immigration bill and border security
bill in 50 years.
Which ain't saying much.
Stop lying about it. We all can read it for ourselves.
Yes, I actually did read it. And it says exactly what I said it does.
(1) It increases funding for Border Patrol so that they can more
efficiently process illegals into the country, not keep them out.
(2) It allows the free flow of illegals to continue until illegal
entries exceed 8000 in one week or 5000 in one day, at which point the
president may close the border. Note: "may", not "must", which means Joe
Biden can keep doing what he's been doing all along and just let them
keep coming.
(3) Despite previous language in the bill implying it to be the case,
the bill doesn't *actually* close the border, even if this fraudulent
and arbitrary 5000-illegal threshold is reached. Per one of the bill's
co-authors, Senator Chris Murphy (D): "The bill contains a requirement
that the president funnel asylum claims to the land ports of entry when
more than 5000 people cross in a day." So the border never really
closes, the illegals are just funneled through the ports instead of
being allowed to swim across the river and walk into America everywhere.
Fox Fucking News blasted Republicans.
So what?
Fox. Fucking. News. is calling you a liar, too.
So what? Fox lies. You've gleefully pointed that out on many occasions.
Now you want to use them as a reliable source when it helps you get a
win on Usenet.
Don't think I didn't notice how you suddenly stop calling them Faux News
when you do a 180 and cite them to bolster your position.
Post by BTR1701
"I think these are a couple of issues that put Republicans in peril of
looking like literally a do-nothing Congress," Brit Hume told the station
I think Brit fundamentally underestimates how many people in this
country *want* a do-nothing Congress; how many of us feel Congress is at
its best when it's in recess and how readily we'd agree to pay them all
their full salaries to never show up at all.
Post by BTR1701
The three main negotiators on the Senate bill-- Republican Sen. James
Lankford of Oklahoma, Independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and
Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut-- have all pushed back on
criticism of the bill. They emphasize that it would keep more people out
instead of allowing more people to come in-- and that migrants would not be
able to apply for asylum at all if illegal border crossings reach certain
numbers.
Which contradicts the actual text of the bill they supposedly wrote.
(Which actually was written by their staffers and which they probably
haven't even actually read cover to cover, despite being its "authors".)
Post by BTR1701
Lankford has repeatedly emphasized that the emergency authority "is not
designed to let 5,000 people in, it is designed to close the border and
turn 5,000 people around".
Political double-talk. These people out-and-out lie to your face. Just
like the DHS Secretary, the White House spokeshole, and the president
himself have been blatantly lying for the last three years when they've
repeatedly stated without qualification that "the border is secure".
It's not secure. A 3-year-old can see it's not secure. But the
Gaslighter-in-Chief thinks if they just say it enough times, we'll stop
believing our lyin' eyes and take his dementia-addled word for it.
Here's a question: If the border is secure-- as Biden and all his people
have been insisting it is for three years-- why are they now saying it's
not secure because Republicans won't pass "the bill"? If they have
haven't been lying their asses off for three years, there should be no
need for this bill, right?
The bill clearly states that these 'emergency' provisions don't kick in
until there have been 5000 crossings in a 24-hour period. That means
5000 illegals have already gotten in before the provision is triggered.
And neither Fox nor any of these politicians bother to address how this
bill would actually *lessen* the already-minimal standards for allowing
illegals into the country. Right now, people applying for asylum need to
show "a significant possibility that they can establish a credible fear
of persecution on the basis of race, national origin, political beliefs,
etc." Not a high standard. It doesn't require them to provide any actual
evidence of their claims. Just say the magic words and make a claim,
which they've been coached to say and which they've rehearsed, and then
get into the country. But this border bill would lower that standard
even further, if that's possible, from a "significant" possibility of
persecution to merely a "reasonable" possibility of persecution. And
reasonable is just another way of saying 'plausible'. In other words,
it's a bar that anyone from anywhere can clear. There's no way that
anyone claiming asylum will ever get turned away if that's the standard.
This provision is designed to hamstring the immigration judges who have
been denying 95%+ of these fraudulent immigration claims and force them
to grant almost every one of them.
Post by BTR1701
After meeting with Republicans in the Capitol Monday evening, Lankford told
reporters that people understand it once he explains it, "but it's been
said wrong so many times that people immediately just go back to, 'this
lets 5,000 people in a day', which is just factually wrong
No, those of who have actually read the text know you're lying, Jimmy.
No, dumbfuck. Not at all. Your buddy, Trump killed the bill that Biden
needs to secure the border.

Everybody knows it. I provided REPUBLICAN and conservative sources.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
BTR1701
2024-04-02 01:57:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly
care about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Biden wants to add border agents...
...to process illegals into the country more efficiently. Not to, you
know, patrol the border and keep people out.
beef up security...
...which he could do in one morning's work by rescinding his EOs. He
doesn't need any Republican help or cooperation. Weird that he won't do
that, huh?
beef up the legal system to handle it...
...and by 'handle it', he means more admin staff to help get the
illegals into America faster and more efficiently
And Republicans oppose it. Why?
Because it's a shit bill that not only does nothing to secure the border
but explicitly allows up to 8000 unvetted illegals into the country
every day.
Nope. It's a Republican Wish List bill.
It may be a Republican Wish List but it's not anywhere near the wish
list of anyone who wants actual border security.
Republicans are shit on border security because they love illegal
immigration every bit as much as Democrats do, just for different
reasons.
So it's no surprise at all that a bill written by two parties that both
want the flow of illegals to continue is a shit bill that does nothing
for border security.
You fuckers wrote it
I had nothing to do with it.
yourselves, and it's the strongest immigration bill and border security
bill in 50 years.
Which ain't saying much.
Stop lying about it. We all can read it for ourselves.
Yes, I actually did read it. And it says exactly what I said it does.
(1) It increases funding for Border Patrol so that they can more
efficiently process illegals into the country, not keep them out.
(2) It allows the free flow of illegals to continue until illegal
entries exceed 8000 in one week or 5000 in one day, at which point the
president may close the border. Note: "may", not "must", which means Joe
Biden can keep doing what he's been doing all along and just let them
keep coming.
(3) Despite previous language in the bill implying it to be the case,
the bill doesn't *actually* close the border, even if this fraudulent
and arbitrary 5000-illegal threshold is reached. Per one of the bill's
co-authors, Senator Chris Murphy (D): "The bill contains a requirement
that the president funnel asylum claims to the land ports of entry when
more than 5000 people cross in a day." So the border never really
closes, the illegals are just funneled through the ports instead of
being allowed to swim across the river and walk into America everywhere.
Fox Fucking News blasted Republicans.
So what?
Fox. Fucking. News. is calling you a liar, too.
So what? Fox lies. You've gleefully pointed that out on many occasions.
Now you want to use them as a reliable source when it helps you get a
win on Usenet.
Don't think I didn't notice how you suddenly stop calling them Faux News
when you do a 180 and cite them to bolster your position.
Post by BTR1701
"I think these are a couple of issues that put Republicans in peril of
looking like literally a do-nothing Congress," Brit Hume told the station
I think Brit fundamentally underestimates how many people in this
country *want* a do-nothing Congress; how many of us feel Congress is at
its best when it's in recess and how readily we'd agree to pay them all
their full salaries to never show up at all.
Post by BTR1701
The three main negotiators on the Senate bill-- Republican Sen. James
Lankford of Oklahoma, Independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and
Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut-- have all pushed back on
criticism of the bill. They emphasize that it would keep more people out
instead of allowing more people to come in-- and that migrants would not be
able to apply for asylum at all if illegal border crossings reach certain
numbers.
Which contradicts the actual text of the bill they supposedly wrote.
(Which actually was written by their staffers and which they probably
haven't even actually read cover to cover, despite being its "authors".)
Post by BTR1701
Lankford has repeatedly emphasized that the emergency authority "is not
designed to let 5,000 people in, it is designed to close the border and
turn 5,000 people around".
Political double-talk. These people out-and-out lie to your face. Just
like the DHS Secretary, the White House spokeshole, and the president
himself have been blatantly lying for the last three years when they've
repeatedly stated without qualification that "the border is secure".
It's not secure. A 3-year-old can see it's not secure. But the
Gaslighter-in-Chief thinks if they just say it enough times, we'll stop
believing our lyin' eyes and take his dementia-addled word for it.
Here's a question: If the border is secure-- as Biden and all his people
have been insisting it is for three years-- why are they now saying it's
not secure because Republicans won't pass "the bill"? If they have
haven't been lying their asses off for three years, there should be no
need for this bill, right?
The bill clearly states that these 'emergency' provisions don't kick in
until there have been 5000 crossings in a 24-hour period. That means
5000 illegals have already gotten in before the provision is triggered.
And neither Fox nor any of these politicians bother to address how this
bill would actually *lessen* the already-minimal standards for allowing
illegals into the country. Right now, people applying for asylum need to
show "a significant possibility that they can establish a credible fear
of persecution on the basis of race, national origin, political beliefs,
etc." Not a high standard. It doesn't require them to provide any actual
evidence of their claims. Just say the magic words and make a claim,
which they've been coached to say and which they've rehearsed, and then
get into the country. But this border bill would lower that standard
even further, if that's possible, from a "significant" possibility of
persecution to merely a "reasonable" possibility of persecution. And
reasonable is just another way of saying 'plausible'. In other words,
it's a bar that anyone from anywhere can clear. There's no way that
anyone claiming asylum will ever get turned away if that's the standard.
This provision is designed to hamstring the immigration judges who have
been denying 95%+ of these fraudulent immigration claims and force them
to grant almost every one of them.
Post by BTR1701
After meeting with Republicans in the Capitol Monday evening, Lankford told
reporters that people understand it once he explains it, "but it's been
said wrong so many times that people immediately just go back to, 'this
lets 5,000 people in a day', which is just factually wrong
No, those of who have actually read the text know you're lying, Jimmy.
No, dumbfuck. Not at all. Your buddy, Trump killed the bill that Biden
needs to secure the border.
Biden already has what he needs to secure the border: he holds the office of
president of the United States.
moviePig
2024-04-02 02:17:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly
care about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Biden wants to add border agents...
...to process illegals into the country more efficiently. Not to, you
know, patrol the border and keep people out.
beef up security...
...which he could do in one morning's work by rescinding his EOs. He
doesn't need any Republican help or cooperation. Weird that he won't do
that, huh?
beef up the legal system to handle it...
...and by 'handle it', he means more admin staff to help get the
illegals into America faster and more efficiently
And Republicans oppose it. Why?
Because it's a shit bill that not only does nothing to secure the border
but explicitly allows up to 8000 unvetted illegals into the country
every day.
Nope. It's a Republican Wish List bill.
It may be a Republican Wish List but it's not anywhere near the wish
list of anyone who wants actual border security.
Republicans are shit on border security because they love illegal
immigration every bit as much as Democrats do, just for different
reasons.
So it's no surprise at all that a bill written by two parties that both
want the flow of illegals to continue is a shit bill that does nothing
for border security.
You fuckers wrote it
I had nothing to do with it.
yourselves, and it's the strongest immigration bill and border security
bill in 50 years.
Which ain't saying much.
Stop lying about it. We all can read it for ourselves.
Yes, I actually did read it. And it says exactly what I said it does.
(1) It increases funding for Border Patrol so that they can more
efficiently process illegals into the country, not keep them out.
(2) It allows the free flow of illegals to continue until illegal
entries exceed 8000 in one week or 5000 in one day, at which point the
president may close the border. Note: "may", not "must", which means Joe
Biden can keep doing what he's been doing all along and just let them
keep coming.
(3) Despite previous language in the bill implying it to be the case,
the bill doesn't *actually* close the border, even if this fraudulent
and arbitrary 5000-illegal threshold is reached. Per one of the bill's
co-authors, Senator Chris Murphy (D): "The bill contains a requirement
that the president funnel asylum claims to the land ports of entry when
more than 5000 people cross in a day." So the border never really
closes, the illegals are just funneled through the ports instead of
being allowed to swim across the river and walk into America everywhere.
Fox Fucking News blasted Republicans.
So what?
Fox. Fucking. News. is calling you a liar, too.
So what? Fox lies. You've gleefully pointed that out on many occasions.
Now you want to use them as a reliable source when it helps you get a
win on Usenet.
Don't think I didn't notice how you suddenly stop calling them Faux News
when you do a 180 and cite them to bolster your position.
Post by BTR1701
"I think these are a couple of issues that put Republicans in peril of
looking like literally a do-nothing Congress," Brit Hume told the station
I think Brit fundamentally underestimates how many people in this
country *want* a do-nothing Congress; how many of us feel Congress is at
its best when it's in recess and how readily we'd agree to pay them all
their full salaries to never show up at all.
Post by BTR1701
The three main negotiators on the Senate bill-- Republican Sen. James
Lankford of Oklahoma, Independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and
Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut-- have all pushed back on
criticism of the bill. They emphasize that it would keep more people out
instead of allowing more people to come in-- and that migrants would not be
able to apply for asylum at all if illegal border crossings reach certain
numbers.
Which contradicts the actual text of the bill they supposedly wrote.
(Which actually was written by their staffers and which they probably
haven't even actually read cover to cover, despite being its "authors".)
Post by BTR1701
Lankford has repeatedly emphasized that the emergency authority "is not
designed to let 5,000 people in, it is designed to close the border and
turn 5,000 people around".
Political double-talk. These people out-and-out lie to your face. Just
like the DHS Secretary, the White House spokeshole, and the president
himself have been blatantly lying for the last three years when they've
repeatedly stated without qualification that "the border is secure".
It's not secure. A 3-year-old can see it's not secure. But the
Gaslighter-in-Chief thinks if they just say it enough times, we'll stop
believing our lyin' eyes and take his dementia-addled word for it.
Here's a question: If the border is secure-- as Biden and all his people
have been insisting it is for three years-- why are they now saying it's
not secure because Republicans won't pass "the bill"? If they have
haven't been lying their asses off for three years, there should be no
need for this bill, right?
The bill clearly states that these 'emergency' provisions don't kick in
until there have been 5000 crossings in a 24-hour period. That means
5000 illegals have already gotten in before the provision is triggered.
And neither Fox nor any of these politicians bother to address how this
bill would actually *lessen* the already-minimal standards for allowing
illegals into the country. Right now, people applying for asylum need to
show "a significant possibility that they can establish a credible fear
of persecution on the basis of race, national origin, political beliefs,
etc." Not a high standard. It doesn't require them to provide any actual
evidence of their claims. Just say the magic words and make a claim,
which they've been coached to say and which they've rehearsed, and then
get into the country. But this border bill would lower that standard
even further, if that's possible, from a "significant" possibility of
persecution to merely a "reasonable" possibility of persecution. And
reasonable is just another way of saying 'plausible'. In other words,
it's a bar that anyone from anywhere can clear. There's no way that
anyone claiming asylum will ever get turned away if that's the standard.
This provision is designed to hamstring the immigration judges who have
been denying 95%+ of these fraudulent immigration claims and force them
to grant almost every one of them.
Post by BTR1701
After meeting with Republicans in the Capitol Monday evening, Lankford told
reporters that people understand it once he explains it, "but it's been
said wrong so many times that people immediately just go back to, 'this
lets 5,000 people in a day', which is just factually wrong
No, those of who have actually read the text know you're lying, Jimmy.
No, dumbfuck. Not at all. Your buddy, Trump killed the bill that Biden
needs to secure the border.
Biden already has what he needs to secure the border: he holds the office of
president of the United States.
To my knowledge, there's never been a POTUS more vociferously intent on
"securing the border" than Donnie. Why didn't *he* have "all he needs"?
BTR1701
2024-04-02 04:05:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly
care about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Biden wants to add border agents...
...to process illegals into the country more efficiently. Not to, you
know, patrol the border and keep people out.
beef up security...
...which he could do in one morning's work by rescinding his EOs. He
doesn't need any Republican help or cooperation. Weird that he won't do
that, huh?
beef up the legal system to handle it...
...and by 'handle it', he means more admin staff to help get the
illegals into America faster and more efficiently
And Republicans oppose it. Why?
Because it's a shit bill that not only does nothing to secure the border
but explicitly allows up to 8000 unvetted illegals into the country
every day.
Nope. It's a Republican Wish List bill.
It may be a Republican Wish List but it's not anywhere near the wish
list of anyone who wants actual border security.
Republicans are shit on border security because they love illegal
immigration every bit as much as Democrats do, just for different
reasons.
So it's no surprise at all that a bill written by two parties that both
want the flow of illegals to continue is a shit bill that does nothing
for border security.
You fuckers wrote it
I had nothing to do with it.
yourselves, and it's the strongest immigration bill and border security
bill in 50 years.
Which ain't saying much.
Stop lying about it. We all can read it for ourselves.
Yes, I actually did read it. And it says exactly what I said it does.
(1) It increases funding for Border Patrol so that they can more
efficiently process illegals into the country, not keep them out.
(2) It allows the free flow of illegals to continue until illegal
entries exceed 8000 in one week or 5000 in one day, at which point the
president may close the border. Note: "may", not "must", which means Joe
Biden can keep doing what he's been doing all along and just let them
keep coming.
(3) Despite previous language in the bill implying it to be the case,
the bill doesn't *actually* close the border, even if this fraudulent
and arbitrary 5000-illegal threshold is reached. Per one of the bill's
co-authors, Senator Chris Murphy (D): "The bill contains a requirement
that the president funnel asylum claims to the land ports of entry when
more than 5000 people cross in a day." So the border never really
closes, the illegals are just funneled through the ports instead of
being allowed to swim across the river and walk into America everywhere.
Fox Fucking News blasted Republicans.
So what?
Fox. Fucking. News. is calling you a liar, too.
So what? Fox lies. You've gleefully pointed that out on many occasions.
Now you want to use them as a reliable source when it helps you get a
win on Usenet.
Don't think I didn't notice how you suddenly stop calling them Faux News
when you do a 180 and cite them to bolster your position.
Post by BTR1701
"I think these are a couple of issues that put Republicans in peril of
looking like literally a do-nothing Congress," Brit Hume told the station
I think Brit fundamentally underestimates how many people in this
country *want* a do-nothing Congress; how many of us feel Congress is at
its best when it's in recess and how readily we'd agree to pay them all
their full salaries to never show up at all.
Post by BTR1701
The three main negotiators on the Senate bill-- Republican Sen. James
Lankford of Oklahoma, Independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and
Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut-- have all pushed back on
criticism of the bill. They emphasize that it would keep more people out
instead of allowing more people to come in-- and that migrants would not be
able to apply for asylum at all if illegal border crossings reach certain
numbers.
Which contradicts the actual text of the bill they supposedly wrote.
(Which actually was written by their staffers and which they probably
haven't even actually read cover to cover, despite being its "authors".)
Post by BTR1701
Lankford has repeatedly emphasized that the emergency authority "is not
designed to let 5,000 people in, it is designed to close the border and
turn 5,000 people around".
Political double-talk. These people out-and-out lie to your face. Just
like the DHS Secretary, the White House spokeshole, and the president
himself have been blatantly lying for the last three years when they've
repeatedly stated without qualification that "the border is secure".
It's not secure. A 3-year-old can see it's not secure. But the
Gaslighter-in-Chief thinks if they just say it enough times, we'll stop
believing our lyin' eyes and take his dementia-addled word for it.
Here's a question: If the border is secure-- as Biden and all his people
have been insisting it is for three years-- why are they now saying it's
not secure because Republicans won't pass "the bill"? If they have
haven't been lying their asses off for three years, there should be no
need for this bill, right?
The bill clearly states that these 'emergency' provisions don't kick in
until there have been 5000 crossings in a 24-hour period. That means
5000 illegals have already gotten in before the provision is triggered.
And neither Fox nor any of these politicians bother to address how this
bill would actually *lessen* the already-minimal standards for allowing
illegals into the country. Right now, people applying for asylum need to
show "a significant possibility that they can establish a credible fear
of persecution on the basis of race, national origin, political beliefs,
etc." Not a high standard. It doesn't require them to provide any actual
evidence of their claims. Just say the magic words and make a claim,
which they've been coached to say and which they've rehearsed, and then
get into the country. But this border bill would lower that standard
even further, if that's possible, from a "significant" possibility of
persecution to merely a "reasonable" possibility of persecution. And
reasonable is just another way of saying 'plausible'. In other words,
it's a bar that anyone from anywhere can clear. There's no way that
anyone claiming asylum will ever get turned away if that's the standard.
This provision is designed to hamstring the immigration judges who have
been denying 95%+ of these fraudulent immigration claims and force them
to grant almost every one of them.
Post by BTR1701
After meeting with Republicans in the Capitol Monday evening, Lankford told
reporters that people understand it once he explains it, "but it's been
said wrong so many times that people immediately just go back to, 'this
lets 5,000 people in a day', which is just factually wrong
No, those of who have actually read the text know you're lying, Jimmy.
No, dumbfuck. Not at all. Your buddy, Trump killed the bill that Biden
needs to secure the border.
Biden already has what he needs to secure the border: he holds the office of
president of the United States.
To my knowledge, there's never been a POTUS more vociferously intent on
"securing the border" than Donnie. Why didn't *he* have "all he needs"?
Donnie and his big business cronies don't want a secure border any more than
the Dems do. Trump did a few good things but he could have done much, much
more.
FPP
2024-04-02 10:18:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by moviePig
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly
care about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Biden wants to add border agents...
...to process illegals into the country more efficiently. Not to, you
know, patrol the border and keep people out.
beef up security...
...which he could do in one morning's work by rescinding his EOs. He
doesn't need any Republican help or cooperation. Weird that he won't do
that, huh?
beef up the legal system to handle it...
...and by 'handle it', he means more admin staff to help get the
illegals into America faster and more efficiently
And Republicans oppose it. Why?
Because it's a shit bill that not only does nothing to secure the border
but explicitly allows up to 8000 unvetted illegals into the country
every day.
Nope. It's a Republican Wish List bill.
It may be a Republican Wish List but it's not anywhere near the wish
list of anyone who wants actual border security.
Republicans are shit on border security because they love illegal
immigration every bit as much as Democrats do, just for different
reasons.
So it's no surprise at all that a bill written by two parties that both
want the flow of illegals to continue is a shit bill that does nothing
for border security.
You fuckers wrote it
I had nothing to do with it.
yourselves, and it's the strongest immigration bill and border security
bill in 50 years.
Which ain't saying much.
Stop lying about it. We all can read it for ourselves.
Yes, I actually did read it. And it says exactly what I said it does.
(1) It increases funding for Border Patrol so that they can more
efficiently process illegals into the country, not keep them out.
(2) It allows the free flow of illegals to continue until illegal
entries exceed 8000 in one week or 5000 in one day, at which point the
president may close the border. Note: "may", not "must", which means Joe
Biden can keep doing what he's been doing all along and just let them
keep coming.
(3) Despite previous language in the bill implying it to be the case,
the bill doesn't *actually* close the border, even if this fraudulent
and arbitrary 5000-illegal threshold is reached. Per one of the bill's
co-authors, Senator Chris Murphy (D): "The bill contains a requirement
that the president funnel asylum claims to the land ports of entry when
more than 5000 people cross in a day." So the border never really
closes, the illegals are just funneled through the ports instead of
being allowed to swim across the river and walk into America everywhere.
Fox Fucking News blasted Republicans.
So what?
Fox. Fucking. News. is calling you a liar, too.
So what? Fox lies. You've gleefully pointed that out on many occasions.
Now you want to use them as a reliable source when it helps you get a
win on Usenet.
Don't think I didn't notice how you suddenly stop calling them Faux News
when you do a 180 and cite them to bolster your position.
Post by BTR1701
"I think these are a couple of issues that put Republicans in peril of
looking like literally a do-nothing Congress," Brit Hume told the station
I think Brit fundamentally underestimates how many people in this
country *want* a do-nothing Congress; how many of us feel Congress is at
its best when it's in recess and how readily we'd agree to pay them all
their full salaries to never show up at all.
Post by BTR1701
The three main negotiators on the Senate bill-- Republican Sen. James
Lankford of Oklahoma, Independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and
Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut-- have all pushed back on
criticism of the bill. They emphasize that it would keep more people out
instead of allowing more people to come in-- and that migrants would not be
able to apply for asylum at all if illegal border crossings reach certain
numbers.
Which contradicts the actual text of the bill they supposedly wrote.
(Which actually was written by their staffers and which they probably
haven't even actually read cover to cover, despite being its "authors".)
Post by BTR1701
Lankford has repeatedly emphasized that the emergency authority "is not
designed to let 5,000 people in, it is designed to close the border and
turn 5,000 people around".
Political double-talk. These people out-and-out lie to your face. Just
like the DHS Secretary, the White House spokeshole, and the president
himself have been blatantly lying for the last three years when they've
repeatedly stated without qualification that "the border is secure".
It's not secure. A 3-year-old can see it's not secure. But the
Gaslighter-in-Chief thinks if they just say it enough times, we'll stop
believing our lyin' eyes and take his dementia-addled word for it.
Here's a question: If the border is secure-- as Biden and all his people
have been insisting it is for three years-- why are they now saying it's
not secure because Republicans won't pass "the bill"? If they have
haven't been lying their asses off for three years, there should be no
need for this bill, right?
The bill clearly states that these 'emergency' provisions don't kick in
until there have been 5000 crossings in a 24-hour period. That means
5000 illegals have already gotten in before the provision is triggered.
And neither Fox nor any of these politicians bother to address how this
bill would actually *lessen* the already-minimal standards for allowing
illegals into the country. Right now, people applying for asylum need to
show "a significant possibility that they can establish a credible fear
of persecution on the basis of race, national origin, political beliefs,
etc." Not a high standard. It doesn't require them to provide any actual
evidence of their claims. Just say the magic words and make a claim,
which they've been coached to say and which they've rehearsed, and then
get into the country. But this border bill would lower that standard
even further, if that's possible, from a "significant" possibility of
persecution to merely a "reasonable" possibility of persecution. And
reasonable is just another way of saying 'plausible'. In other words,
it's a bar that anyone from anywhere can clear. There's no way that
anyone claiming asylum will ever get turned away if that's the standard.
This provision is designed to hamstring the immigration judges who have
been denying 95%+ of these fraudulent immigration claims and force them
to grant almost every one of them.
Post by BTR1701
After meeting with Republicans in the Capitol Monday evening, Lankford told
reporters that people understand it once he explains it, "but it's been
said wrong so many times that people immediately just go back to, 'this
lets 5,000 people in a day', which is just factually wrong
No, those of who have actually read the text know you're lying, Jimmy.
No, dumbfuck. Not at all. Your buddy, Trump killed the bill that Biden
needs to secure the border.
Biden already has what he needs to secure the border: he holds the office of
president of the United States.
To my knowledge, there's never been a POTUS more vociferously intent on
"securing the border" than Donnie. Why didn't *he* have "all he needs"?
Donnie and his big business cronies don't want a secure border any more than
the Dems do. Trump did a few good things but he could have done much, much
more.
And there's more evidence of that 4 year coma you were in. Funny, but
you didn't rag on Trump for not doing what you instantly ragged on Biden
for not doing.

One would almost think you had a double standard, there...
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
FPP
2024-04-02 10:16:08 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly
care about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Biden wants to add border agents...
...to process illegals into the country more efficiently. Not to, you
know, patrol the border and keep people out.
beef up security...
...which he could do in one morning's work by rescinding his EOs. He
doesn't need any Republican help or cooperation. Weird that he won't do
that, huh?
beef up the legal system to handle it...
...and by 'handle it', he means more admin staff to help get the
illegals into America faster and more efficiently
And Republicans oppose it. Why?
Because it's a shit bill that not only does nothing to secure the border
but explicitly allows up to 8000 unvetted illegals into the country
every day.
Nope. It's a Republican Wish List bill.
It may be a Republican Wish List but it's not anywhere near the wish
list of anyone who wants actual border security.
Republicans are shit on border security because they love illegal
immigration every bit as much as Democrats do, just for different
reasons.
So it's no surprise at all that a bill written by two parties that both
want the flow of illegals to continue is a shit bill that does nothing
for border security.
You fuckers wrote it
I had nothing to do with it.
yourselves, and it's the strongest immigration bill and border security
bill in 50 years.
Which ain't saying much.
Stop lying about it. We all can read it for ourselves.
Yes, I actually did read it. And it says exactly what I said it does.
(1) It increases funding for Border Patrol so that they can more
efficiently process illegals into the country, not keep them out.
(2) It allows the free flow of illegals to continue until illegal
entries exceed 8000 in one week or 5000 in one day, at which point the
president may close the border. Note: "may", not "must", which means Joe
Biden can keep doing what he's been doing all along and just let them
keep coming.
(3) Despite previous language in the bill implying it to be the case,
the bill doesn't *actually* close the border, even if this fraudulent
and arbitrary 5000-illegal threshold is reached. Per one of the bill's
co-authors, Senator Chris Murphy (D): "The bill contains a requirement
that the president funnel asylum claims to the land ports of entry when
more than 5000 people cross in a day." So the border never really
closes, the illegals are just funneled through the ports instead of
being allowed to swim across the river and walk into America everywhere.
Fox Fucking News blasted Republicans.
So what?
Fox. Fucking. News. is calling you a liar, too.
So what? Fox lies. You've gleefully pointed that out on many occasions.
Now you want to use them as a reliable source when it helps you get a
win on Usenet.
Don't think I didn't notice how you suddenly stop calling them Faux News
when you do a 180 and cite them to bolster your position.
Post by BTR1701
"I think these are a couple of issues that put Republicans in peril of
looking like literally a do-nothing Congress," Brit Hume told the station
I think Brit fundamentally underestimates how many people in this
country *want* a do-nothing Congress; how many of us feel Congress is at
its best when it's in recess and how readily we'd agree to pay them all
their full salaries to never show up at all.
Post by BTR1701
The three main negotiators on the Senate bill-- Republican Sen. James
Lankford of Oklahoma, Independent Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and
Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut-- have all pushed back on
criticism of the bill. They emphasize that it would keep more people out
instead of allowing more people to come in-- and that migrants would not be
able to apply for asylum at all if illegal border crossings reach certain
numbers.
Which contradicts the actual text of the bill they supposedly wrote.
(Which actually was written by their staffers and which they probably
haven't even actually read cover to cover, despite being its "authors".)
Post by BTR1701
Lankford has repeatedly emphasized that the emergency authority "is not
designed to let 5,000 people in, it is designed to close the border and
turn 5,000 people around".
Political double-talk. These people out-and-out lie to your face. Just
like the DHS Secretary, the White House spokeshole, and the president
himself have been blatantly lying for the last three years when they've
repeatedly stated without qualification that "the border is secure".
It's not secure. A 3-year-old can see it's not secure. But the
Gaslighter-in-Chief thinks if they just say it enough times, we'll stop
believing our lyin' eyes and take his dementia-addled word for it.
Here's a question: If the border is secure-- as Biden and all his people
have been insisting it is for three years-- why are they now saying it's
not secure because Republicans won't pass "the bill"? If they have
haven't been lying their asses off for three years, there should be no
need for this bill, right?
The bill clearly states that these 'emergency' provisions don't kick in
until there have been 5000 crossings in a 24-hour period. That means
5000 illegals have already gotten in before the provision is triggered.
And neither Fox nor any of these politicians bother to address how this
bill would actually *lessen* the already-minimal standards for allowing
illegals into the country. Right now, people applying for asylum need to
show "a significant possibility that they can establish a credible fear
of persecution on the basis of race, national origin, political beliefs,
etc." Not a high standard. It doesn't require them to provide any actual
evidence of their claims. Just say the magic words and make a claim,
which they've been coached to say and which they've rehearsed, and then
get into the country. But this border bill would lower that standard
even further, if that's possible, from a "significant" possibility of
persecution to merely a "reasonable" possibility of persecution. And
reasonable is just another way of saying 'plausible'. In other words,
it's a bar that anyone from anywhere can clear. There's no way that
anyone claiming asylum will ever get turned away if that's the standard.
This provision is designed to hamstring the immigration judges who have
been denying 95%+ of these fraudulent immigration claims and force them
to grant almost every one of them.
Post by BTR1701
After meeting with Republicans in the Capitol Monday evening, Lankford told
reporters that people understand it once he explains it, "but it's been
said wrong so many times that people immediately just go back to, 'this
lets 5,000 people in a day', which is just factually wrong
No, those of who have actually read the text know you're lying, Jimmy.
No, dumbfuck. Not at all. Your buddy, Trump killed the bill that Biden
needs to secure the border.
Biden already has what he needs to secure the border: he holds the office of
president of the United States.
Sure he does. That's your excuse? He's asking Congress for the authority.

Authority is in the bill YOU GUYS WROTE. But they won't vote for THEIR
OWN BILL because Trump told them not to.

If Trump had the power to close the border you claim Biden has, then why
didn't HE do it?

Didn't he think it was important?
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
BTR1701
2024-04-02 17:39:47 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Your buddy, Trump killed the bill that Biden needs to secure the border.
Biden already has what he needs to secure the border: he holds the office
of president of the United States.
He's asking Congress for the authority.
Authority is in the bill YOU GUYS WROTE.
I had nothing to do with it.

And the authority is also in the Immigration and Nationality Act
of 1952, which is current law and needs no help from Republicans.
trotsky
2024-04-02 20:11:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Your buddy, Trump killed the bill that Biden needs to secure the border.
Biden already has what he needs to secure the border: he holds the office
of president of the United States.
He's asking Congress for the authority.
Authority is in the bill YOU GUYS WROTE.
I had nothing to do with it.
And the authority is also in the Immigration and Nationality Act
of 1952, which is current law and needs no help from Republicans.
So Joe is acting within the realm of current law and you fucks have
nothing to complain about? Why didn't you say so in the first place?
FPP
2024-04-03 10:57:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by trotsky
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Your buddy, Trump killed the bill that Biden needs to secure the border.
Biden already has what he needs to secure the border: he holds the office
of president of the United States.
He's asking Congress for the authority.
Authority is in the bill YOU GUYS WROTE.
I had nothing to do with it.
And the authority is also in the Immigration and Nationality Act
of 1952, which is current law and needs no help from Republicans.
So Joe is acting within the realm of current law and you fucks have
nothing to complain about?  Why didn't you say so in the first place?
He's just fucking wrong. It would violate not only the asylum law, but
others that prohibit sending them back to their deaths.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
The Horny Goat
2024-04-04 23:58:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by FPP
He's just fucking wrong. It would violate not only the asylum law, but
others that prohibit sending them back to their deaths.
The whole problem with 'refugees' from Mexico is not tyrannical action
by the Mexican government but rather that the Mexican government for
better or for worse are NOT currently trying to win their 'war' with
the Mexican drug lords who are both manufacturing vast amounts of
Fentanyl from precursor chemicals imported mostly from China which are
killing thousands of Americans, but that these same groups have
largely superceded local government authority and terrorizing Mexicans
in the area where they're the de facto government.

Which is NOT under international law a reason for claiming refugee
status.

Again - the Mexican situation is de facto due to neglect by the
Mexican government not meeting their duties under international law to
the detriment of their own people.
FPP
2024-04-05 00:31:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by The Horny Goat
Post by FPP
He's just fucking wrong. It would violate not only the asylum law, but
others that prohibit sending them back to their deaths.
The whole problem with 'refugees' from Mexico is not tyrannical action
by the Mexican government but rather that the Mexican government for
better or for worse are NOT currently trying to win their 'war' with
the Mexican drug lords who are both manufacturing vast amounts of
Fentanyl from precursor chemicals imported mostly from China which are
killing thousands of Americans, but that these same groups have
largely superceded local government authority and terrorizing Mexicans
in the area where they're the de facto government.
Which is NOT under international law a reason for claiming refugee
status.
Again - the Mexican situation is de facto due to neglect by the
Mexican government not meeting their duties under international law to
the detriment of their own people.
Which still means Thanny is still dead wrong.

Mexico is losing the war because the cartels are rich and powerful. And
the the US keeping things like cannabis illegal for decades just helped
make them that way.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
BTR1701
2024-04-05 01:11:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by The Horny Goat
Post by FPP
He's just fucking wrong. It would violate not only the asylum law, but
others that prohibit sending them back to their deaths.
The whole problem with 'refugees' from Mexico is not tyrannical action
by the Mexican government but rather that the Mexican government for
better or for worse are NOT currently trying to win their 'war' with
the Mexican drug lords who are both manufacturing vast amounts of
Fentanyl from precursor chemicals imported mostly from China which are
killing thousands of Americans, but that these same groups have
largely superceded local government authority and terrorizing Mexicans
in the area where they're the de facto government.
Which is NOT under international law a reason for claiming refugee
status.
Which is why more than 98% of the asylum claims are denied whenever they
eventually see a judge.
FPP
2024-04-05 13:41:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by The Horny Goat
Post by FPP
He's just fucking wrong. It would violate not only the asylum law, but
others that prohibit sending them back to their deaths.
The whole problem with 'refugees' from Mexico is not tyrannical action
by the Mexican government but rather that the Mexican government for
better or for worse are NOT currently trying to win their 'war' with
the Mexican drug lords who are both manufacturing vast amounts of
Fentanyl from precursor chemicals imported mostly from China which are
killing thousands of Americans, but that these same groups have
largely superceded local government authority and terrorizing Mexicans
in the area where they're the de facto government.
Which is NOT under international law a reason for claiming refugee
status.
Which is why more than 98% of the asylum claims are denied whenever they
eventually see a judge.
Cite? Your ass doesn't qualify.
Here, don't embarrass yourself... let me do that for you!
Post by BTR1701
In fiscal year 2022, immigration judges decided 52,000 asylum cases; about 46% of people were granted asylum.
Politifact says you're full of shit... and off by more than an order of
magnitude.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
The Horny Goat
2024-04-06 07:20:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by The Horny Goat
The whole problem with 'refugees' from Mexico is not tyrannical action
by the Mexican government but rather that the Mexican government for
better or for worse are NOT currently trying to win their 'war' with
the Mexican drug lords who are both manufacturing vast amounts of
Fentanyl from precursor chemicals imported mostly from China which are
killing thousands of Americans, but that these same groups have
largely superceded local government authority and terrorizing Mexicans
in the area where they're the de facto government.
Which is NOT under international law a reason for claiming refugee
status.
Which is why more than 98% of the asylum claims are denied whenever they
eventually see a judge.
And how many of those 98% show up for execution of their deportation
orders after seeing the judge? Because I haven't heard failed
claimants are incarcerated pending deportation.
FPP
2024-04-03 10:56:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Your buddy, Trump killed the bill that Biden needs to secure the border.
Biden already has what he needs to secure the border: he holds the office
of president of the United States.
He's asking Congress for the authority.
Authority is in the bill YOU GUYS WROTE.
I had nothing to do with it.
And the authority is also in the Immigration and Nationality Act
of 1952, which is current law and needs no help from Republicans.
Full of shit (and wrong) as always.
Post by BTR1701
No, the president can’t completely close the border via executive order
VERIFY readers asked if Biden can close the border with an executive order. Presidents have restricted who comes into the U.S., but those orders can only go so far.
THE QUESTION: Can a president completely shut down the border with an executive order?
THE SOURCES
Post by FPP
8 U.S.C. 1158
Immigration and Nationality Act
Congressional Research Service (CRS)
Stephen Yale-Loehr, professor of immigration law practice at Cornell Law School
Julia Gelatt, associate director of the U.S. Immigration Policy Program at the Migration Policy Institute
THE ANSWER
No, a president cannot completely shut down the border with an executive order. A full border closure would violate federal laws granting people the right to seek asylum.
It’s not possible for Biden or any other president to completely shut down the border with an executive order. That’s because doing so would violate existing federal laws, including one that gives people the right to seek asylum.
Federal law currently says anybody who’s on U.S. soil has the right to ask for asylum, whether they enter the U.S. legally or cross the border without authorization. The U.S. also has laws that “offer people protection against being
returned to a place where they would face torture or other harms,

Trump didn't close it, either, because he COULDN'T. Wrong again.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
BTR1701
2024-04-03 18:01:32 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Your buddy, Trump killed the bill that Biden needs to secure the border.
Biden already has what he needs to secure the border: he holds the office
of president of the United States.
He's asking Congress for the authority.
Authority is in the bill YOU GUYS WROTE.
I had nothing to do with it.
And the authority is also in the Immigration and Nationality Act
of 1952, which is current law and needs no help from Republicans.
Full of shit (and wrong) as always.
Post by BTR1701
No, the president can’t completely close the border via executive order
VERIFY readers asked if Biden can close the border with an executive order
Presidents have restricted who comes into the U.S., but those orders ca
only go so far.
THE QUESTION: Can a president completely shut down the border with a
executive order?
I didn't say he could do it with an EO so everything that follows i
irrelevant.
FPP
2024-04-03 23:28:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Your buddy, Trump killed the bill that Biden needs to secure the border.
Biden already has what he needs to secure the border: he holds the office
of president of the United States.
He's asking Congress for the authority.
Authority is in the bill YOU GUYS WROTE.
I had nothing to do with it.
And the authority is also in the Immigration and Nationality Act
of 1952, which is current law and needs no help from Republicans.
Full of shit (and wrong) as always.
Post by BTR1701
No, the president can’t completely close the border via executive order
VERIFY readers asked if Biden can close the border with an executive order.
Presidents have restricted who comes into the U.S., but those orders can
only go so far.
THE QUESTION: Can a president completely shut down the border with an
executive order?
I didn't say he could do it with an EO so everything that follows is
irrelevant.
So what is the instrument? Magic wand?
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
BTR1701
2024-04-03 23:32:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Your buddy, Trump killed the bill that Biden needs to secure the border.
Biden already has what he needs to secure the border: he holds the office
of president of the United States.
He's asking Congress for the authority.
Authority is in the bill YOU GUYS WROTE.
I had nothing to do with it.
And the authority is also in the Immigration and Nationality Act
of 1952, which is current law and needs no help from Republicans.
Full of shit (and wrong) as always.
Post by BTR1701
No, the president can’t completely close the border via executive order
VERIFY readers asked if Biden can close the border with an executive order.
Presidents have restricted who comes into the U.S., but those orders can
only go so far.
THE QUESTION: Can a president completely shut down the border with an
executive order?
I didn't say he could do it with an EO so everything that follows is
irrelevant.
So what is the instrument? Magic wand?
Act of Congress, dipshit.
FPP
2024-04-04 11:07:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Your buddy, Trump killed the bill that Biden needs to secure the border.
Biden already has what he needs to secure the border: he holds the office
of president of the United States.
He's asking Congress for the authority.
Authority is in the bill YOU GUYS WROTE.
I had nothing to do with it.
And the authority is also in the Immigration and Nationality Act
of 1952, which is current law and needs no help from Republicans.
Full of shit (and wrong) as always.
Post by BTR1701
No, the president can’t completely close the border via executive order
VERIFY readers asked if Biden can close the border with an executive order.
Presidents have restricted who comes into the U.S., but those orders can
only go so far.
THE QUESTION: Can a president completely shut down the border with an
executive order?
I didn't say he could do it with an EO so everything that follows is
irrelevant.
So what is the instrument? Magic wand?
Act of Congress, dipshit.
Presidents make them now?
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
BTR1701
2024-04-04 19:27:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Your buddy, Trump killed the bill that Biden needs to secure the border.
Biden already has what he needs to secure the border: he holds the
office of president of the United States.
He's asking Congress for the authority.
Authority is in the bill YOU GUYS WROTE.
I had nothing to do with it.
And the authority is also in the Immigration and Nationality Act
of 1952, which is current law and needs no help from Republicans.
Full of shit (and wrong) as always.
Post by BTR1701
THE QUESTION: Can a president completely shut down the border with an
executive order?
I didn't say he could do it with an EO so everything that follows is
irrelevant.
So what is the instrument? Magic wand?
Act of Congress, dipshit.
Presidents make them now?
Presidents use them.
FPP
2024-04-04 23:56:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Your buddy, Trump killed the bill that Biden needs to secure the border.
Biden already has what he needs to secure the border: he holds the
office of president of the United States.
He's asking Congress for the authority.
Authority is in the bill YOU GUYS WROTE.
I had nothing to do with it.
And the authority is also in the Immigration and Nationality Act
of 1952, which is current law and needs no help from Republicans.
Full of shit (and wrong) as always.
Post by BTR1701
THE QUESTION: Can a president completely shut down the border with an
executive order?
I didn't say he could do it with an EO so everything that follows is
irrelevant.
So what is the instrument? Magic wand?
Act of Congress, dipshit.
Presidents make them now?
Presidents use them.
So where is this "Act of Congress" exactly?
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
BTR1701
2024-04-05 01:13:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Your buddy, Trump killed the bill that Biden needs to secure the
border.
Biden already has what he needs to secure the border: he holds the
office of president of the United States.
He's asking Congress for the authority.
Authority is in the bill YOU GUYS WROTE.
I had nothing to do with it.
And the authority is also in the Immigration and Nationality Act
of 1952, which is current law and needs no help from Republicans.
Full of shit (and wrong) as always.
Post by BTR1701
THE QUESTION: Can a president completely shut down the border with an
executive order?
I didn't say he could do it with an EO so everything that follows is
irrelevant.
So what is the instrument? Magic wand?
Act of Congress, dipshit.
Presidents make them now?
Presidents use them.
So where is this "Act of Congress" exactly?
Where? I suppose it's in an official book somewhere in the Library of
Congress where all the official laws of the nation are kept. I can't
give you the exact shelf and call number as I live on the other side of
the country.
FPP
2024-04-05 13:42:34 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Your buddy, Trump killed the bill that Biden needs to secure the
border.
Biden already has what he needs to secure the border: he holds the
office of president of the United States.
He's asking Congress for the authority.
Authority is in the bill YOU GUYS WROTE.
I had nothing to do with it.
And the authority is also in the Immigration and Nationality Act
of 1952, which is current law and needs no help from Republicans.
Full of shit (and wrong) as always.
Post by BTR1701
THE QUESTION: Can a president completely shut down the border with an
executive order?
I didn't say he could do it with an EO so everything that follows is
irrelevant.
So what is the instrument? Magic wand?
Act of Congress, dipshit.
Presidents make them now?
Presidents use them.
So where is this "Act of Congress" exactly?
Where? I suppose it's in an official book somewhere in the Library of
Congress where all the official laws of the nation are kept. I can't
give you the exact shelf and call number as I live on the other side of
the country.
Well, I suppose you're full of shit then. You can't even prove what you
say.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
Ubiquitous
2024-04-05 19:27:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by FPP
Well, I suppose you're full of shit then. You can't even prove what you
say.
Projection noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.

--
Let's go Brandon!
Ubiquitous
2024-04-05 19:26:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Your buddy, Trump killed the bill that Biden needs to secure the
border.
Biden already has what he needs to secure the border: he holds the
office of president of the United States.
He's asking Congress for the authority.
Authority is in the bill YOU GUYS WROTE.
I had nothing to do with it.
And the authority is also in the Immigration and Nationality Act
of 1952, which is current law and needs no help from Republicans.
Full of shit (and wrong) as always.
Post by BTR1701
THE QUESTION: Can a president completely shut down the border with an
executive order?
I didn't say he could do it with an EO so everything that follows is
irrelevant.
So what is the instrument? Magic wand?
Act of Congress, dipshit.
Presidents make them now?
Presidents use them.
So where is this "Act of Congress" exactly?
Where? I suppose it's in an official book somewhere in the Library of
Congress where all the official laws of the nation are kept. I can't
give you the exact shelf and call number as I live on the other side of
the country.
One would think that someone with the credentials that FPP claims to have would know that.

--
Let's go Brandon!
trotsky
2024-04-04 09:57:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by FPP
  Your buddy, Trump killed the bill that Biden needs to secure
the border.
  Biden already has what he needs to secure the border: he holds
the office
  of president of the United States.
  He's asking Congress for the authority.
  Authority is in the bill YOU GUYS WROTE.
  I had nothing to do with it.
  And the authority is also in the Immigration and Nationality Act
  of 1952, which is current law and needs no help from Republicans.
Full of shit (and wrong) as always.
  No, the president can’t completely close the border via executive
order
  VERIFY readers asked if Biden can close the border with an
executive order.
Presidents have restricted who comes into the U.S., but those orders can
only go so far.
  THE QUESTION: Can a president completely shut down the border with an
executive order?
I didn't say he could do it with an EO so everything that follows is
irrelevant.
So what is the instrument?  Magic wand?
I think his "magic wand" fell off some time ago.
trotsky
2024-03-31 08:59:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken
pottery, and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and
filling it out and putting it in the mail - and then track it
online so you can see it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the
others are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes.
And not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to
somehow be *losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Shockingly Google returned zero hits on this too. Is it Google's fault
again, and will you be unable to supply proof again?
FPP
2024-03-31 13:29:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken
pottery, and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and
filling it out and putting it in the mail - and then track it
online so you can see it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the
others are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes.
And not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to
somehow be *losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Republicans are stopping him from stopping them. They crafted their own
wish list and then voted against it.

This is a fact.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
BTR1701
2024-03-31 19:52:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at
the last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Republicans are stopping him from stopping them.
The president has authority under current law to close the border
regardless of what Republicans say or do. If Biden wants to do it, he
can do it right now. Hell, if Biden wanted a secure border, he could
have had one the day he raised his hand and took the oath. Instead, he
signed 94 executive orders throwing open the border and let them stand
for 3 years while millions of illegals flooded the country.

He. Doesn't. Want. To. Close. The. Border.

This is a fact.
FPP
2024-04-01 14:25:53 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at
the last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Republicans are stopping him from stopping them.
The president has authority under current law to close the border
regardless of what Republicans say or do. If Biden wants to do it, he
can do it right now. Hell, if Biden wanted a secure border, he could
have had one the day he raised his hand and took the oath. Instead, he
signed 94 executive orders throwing open the border and let them stand
for 3 years while millions of illegals flooded the country.
He. Doesn't. Want. To. Close. The. Border.
This is a fact.
Nope. Biden stated his intention to close the border when the bill
gives him the power to do it.
Post by BTR1701
Biden has said that if the bill passes, it would “give me as president the emergency authority to shut down the border until it could get back under control. If that bill were the law today, I’d shut down the border right now and fix it quickly.”
You're lying again.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
BTR1701
2024-04-01 19:52:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Republicans are stopping him from stopping them.
The president has authority under current law to close the border
regardless of what Republicans say or do. If Biden wants to do it, he
can do it right now. Hell, if Biden wanted a secure border, he could
have had one the day he raised his hand and took the oath. Instead, he
signed 94 executive orders throwing open the border and let them stand
for 3 years while millions of illegals flooded the country.
He. Doesn't. Want. To. Close. The. Border.
This is a fact.
Nope. Biden stated his intention to close the border when the bill
gives him the power to do it.
Biden already has the power to do it under current law no matter how
many times you say 'nope' like an idiot.
FPP
2024-04-01 21:31:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Republicans are stopping him from stopping them.
The president has authority under current law to close the border
regardless of what Republicans say or do. If Biden wants to do it, he
can do it right now. Hell, if Biden wanted a secure border, he could
have had one the day he raised his hand and took the oath. Instead, he
signed 94 executive orders throwing open the border and let them stand
for 3 years while millions of illegals flooded the country.
He. Doesn't. Want. To. Close. The. Border.
This is a fact.
Nope. Biden stated his intention to close the border when the bill
gives him the power to do it.
Biden already has the power to do it under current law no matter how
many times you say 'nope' like an idiot.
Nope. And you've provided ZERO proof he can close the border on a whim.

Now explain why no other president, including the most recent racist
orange one, haven't just done it?

I mean, all those caravans! Why didn't Trumpie the Grate just do it?
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
trotsky
2024-04-02 11:24:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Republicans are stopping him from stopping them.
The president has authority under current law to close the border
regardless of what Republicans say or do. If Biden wants to do it, he
can do it right now. Hell, if Biden wanted a secure border, he could
have had one the day he raised his hand and took the oath. Instead, he
signed 94 executive orders throwing open the border and let them stand
for 3 years while millions of illegals flooded the country.
He. Doesn't. Want. To. Close. The. Border.
This is a fact.
Nope. Biden stated his intention to close the border when the bill
gives him the power to do it.
Biden already has the power to do it under current law no matter how
many times you say 'nope' like an idiot.
Nope.  And you've provided ZERO proof he can close the border on a whim.
Now explain why no other president, including the most recent racist
orange one, haven't just done it?
I mean, all those caravans!  Why didn't Trumpie the Grate just do it?
I wish Oath Keeper Twat would just say what he means: Republicans in
Congress can't be relied for anything and it's all up to Biden.
trotsky
2024-04-02 08:41:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
You've got to be kidding. The basic reason Joe Biden threw open the
southern border and left it that way for three years was nothing but a
gigantic voter fraud scheme.
The Democrats are currently running a long-term voter fraud scheme the
likes and size of which have no rival in human history.
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES.
This is a fact.
Joe Biden is allowing tens of millions of illegals to flood into the
country. This is a fact.
Republicans are stopping him from stopping them.
The president has authority under current law to close the border
regardless of what Republicans say or do. If Biden wants to do it, he
can do it right now. Hell, if Biden wanted a secure border, he could
have had one the day he raised his hand and took the oath. Instead, he
signed 94 executive orders throwing open the border and let them stand
for 3 years while millions of illegals flooded the country.
He. Doesn't. Want. To. Close. The. Border.
This is a fact.
Nope. Biden stated his intention to close the border when the bill
gives him the power to do it.
Biden already has the power to do it under current law no matter how
many times you say 'nope' like an idiot.
That's interesting, if that's the case it's power vs. procedure. So
from what you're saying is Biden wants to go through channels, right
wing assholes tell him to fuck off with no valid reason, and you blame
Biden. Shades of Bob Dylan:

Well, he knocked out a lynch mob, he was criticized
Old women condemned him, said he should apologize
Then he destroyed a bomb factory, nobody was glad
The bombs were meant for him. He was supposed to feel bad
He's the neighborhood bully.
FPP
2024-03-30 16:40:52 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling it
out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes. And
not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to somehow be
*losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
http://youtu.be/o0xbgHmfjj4
Georgia Republican official voted illegally...NINE TIMES
Funny how when we find actual voter fraud it's often the Republicans
that are involved. Not that it matters enough for anyone to truly care
about since the numbers are in the tens of cases in the last few
decades amounting to just a few votes. No major voter fraud has been
found to have actually occurred in the USA in our lifetimes.
Funny how it's always Democrats who get blamed, amirite?
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
moviePig
2024-03-29 21:24:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling it
out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes. And
not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to somehow be
*losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
How large were the adjustments? Enough to remotely matter? If not, why
would you suspect a daring -- not to mention risky -- conspiracy?
FPP
2024-03-30 16:39:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by shawn
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling it
out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes. And
not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to somehow be
*losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Someone made a mistake in the count in the first place, or someone
counted votes for Garvey but it was provisional and those votes were
later removed. Without hearing from the people responsible there's no
way to know just what happened.
It's weird how this only happens to the Republican candidate. We didn't
see any reduction in votes for Schiff. His numbers only rise. Same with
the other Democrat, Katie Porter. Her numbers only go up. Just like
trunk ballots always favor the Democrat by some wild coincidence.
No, it isn't. You haven't shown where that's true.
You keep saying it, but your word is for shit.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
FPP
2024-03-30 16:38:30 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by FPP
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and are trying
their damnedest to get instituted everywhere.
Why don't we just go back to making a mark on a piece of broken pottery,
and put it in a big wine jar?
Because that's WAY better than requesting a ballot online and filling it
out and putting it in the mail - and then track it online so you can see
it was received and accepted.
Because one of those ways is a 21st century innovation, and the others
are as incredibly outdated as stone knives and bear skins.
And yet it'd still be better than what we have now in mail-in
California, where they're *still* counting the March primary votes. And
not only does Schiff keep gaining votes, but Garvey seems to somehow be
*losing* them.
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Ask all you like... it doesn't change the fact you can't prove anything
wrong was done.
--
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC
Bible 25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0
BTR1701
2024-03-30 21:02:21 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Ask all you like... but I won't answer. I'll just deflect and change the
subject.
Fixed that for you.
trotsky
2024-03-31 08:42:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
How do vote totals for a candidate go down? Only in California...
By math, stupid. The same way they go up.
How do you count ten votes for Garvey and then an hour later reduce the
total to eight? Did those two mystery votes exist or not? Did you count
them or not? If you counted them, how could they go away and reduce the
total?
If someone gives you a pile of apples to count and then periodically
checks in to see how you're doing, why would there be less apples at the
last check-in than there were at the first?
Ask all you like... but I won't answer. I'll just deflect and change the
subject.
Fixed that for you.
That's funny, a castrated weasel saying something is "fixed."
BTR1701
2024-04-07 22:51:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying thei
damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
42 out of 50 states in the United States do not require a photo ID to vote.

Countries that require a photo ID to vote:

United Kingdom
Italy
Chile
Spain
Malta
Brazil
Israel
Latvia
Russia
France
Mexico
Austria
Ireland
Poland
Greece
Croatia
Finland
Estonia
Belgium
Sweden
Bulgaria
Portugal
Hungary
Ecuador
Slovenia
Slovakia
Romania
Denmark
Germany
Lithuania
Argentina
Columbia
Botswana
Zimbabwe
Luxemburg
Netherlands
South Africa
Czech Republic
(Just to name a few)

Gosh, the world is just full of racist countries, huh?
Adam H. Kerman
2024-04-08 01:04:29 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
42 out of 50 states in the United States do not require a photo ID to vote.
Where's that list of fraudulently-conducted elections due to a massive
impersonation scandal at the polls?
trotsky
2024-04-08 08:46:48 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by BTR1701
Post by BTR1701
France banned mail-in voting in 1975 due to fraud.
Mexico banned mail-in voting in 1992 due to fraud.
Belgium banned mail-in voting in 2018 due to fraud.
Sweden rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Italy rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Ukraine rejected a mail-in voting proposal.
Russia and Japan do not permit mail-in voting.
No Middle Eastern country permits mail-in voting.
No Latin American country permits mail-in voting.
In the United States, Democrats love mail-in voting and trying their
damnedest
to get instituted everywhere.
42 out of 50 states in the United States do not require a photo ID to vote.
United Kingdom
Italy
Chile
Spain
Malta
Brazil
Israel
Latvia
Russia
France
Mexico
Austria
Ireland
Poland
Greece
Croatia
Finland
Estonia
Belgium
Sweden
Bulgaria
Portugal
Hungary
Ecuador
Slovenia
Slovakia
Romania
Denmark
Germany
Lithuania
Argentina
Columbia
Botswana
Zimbabwe
Luxemburg
Netherlands
South Africa
Czech Republic
(Just to name a few)
Gosh, the world is just full of racist countries, huh?
Let's see if I'm hearing this right: America has a system of govt. that
most countries on Earth seek to emulate but with respect to voting we
need to be more like Luxembourg? Are you sure that's the line of
horseshit you want to go with?

Loading...