Discussion:
The Biggest Media Fails Of 2024
Add Reply
Ubiquitous
2025-01-03 09:30:44 UTC
Reply
Permalink
: The following is an edited transcript of an interview between Morning
: Wire host Georgia Howe and Daily Wire culture reporter Megan Basham
: on a New Year's Day edition of Morning Wire.

2024 saw Americans' trust in the legacy media sink to all-time lows,
contributing to massive layoffs and loss of audience among some of the
biggest news outlets. These were the media's failures over the last year that
likely played a role in this lack of trust.

GEORGIA: Daily Wire culture reporter Megan Basham joins us now to look back
at the year's biggest media fails that are contributing to the public's
record-low trust. But Megan, before we get to that, can you give us a quick
overview of where the industry stands now? Along with a lot of controversies
and corrections, there was also a lot of contraction for an election year
when you typically see news departments expanding.

MEGAN: Yeah, the media landscape looks bad. Really bad. If you remember,
Georgia, right before the start of the year we saw substantial layoffs at The
Washington Post, The New York Times, and NPR. And as you said, that's not
what you expect to see heading into a major campaign year, when media
revenues tend to increase.

Then in January, the Los Angeles Times cut more than 20% of its newsroom.
Time Magazine cut 15%. And that bad news just continued throughout 2024. In
the summer, CNN laid off 100 people. And they're now reportedly planning to
lay off hundreds more. Comcast may sell MSNBC.

And neither of those developments is surprising when you look at some of the
cable news ratings. They're a dumpster fire. According to Nielsen data, MSNBC
is still down by more than half of what it was averaging up to election
night, and CNN is down by slightly less than half, though it didn't have as
far to fall because it was already at the bottom of the pack.

Fox News ratings are way up this year. They're now beating the ratings of the
other cable news outlets combined, suggesting a lot of former CNN and MSNBC
viewers are flocking there.

GEORGIA: Well let's talk about some of the coverage that's likely driving a
lot of the legacy media's poor performance. When you look back over the year,
what are the biggest standouts to you?

MEGAN: For me, the biggest one wasn't an issue where there was clear
deception or inaccuracy, but just appallingly callous coverage of the most
momentous moment of the campaign. And that was the response to the attempt on
President-elect Donald Trump's life at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania on
July 13th.

That very same night, ABC viewers heard George Stephanopoulos and Martha
Raddatz, in part, blaming the victim.

These mainstream media hacks are SICK. They're already blaming Trump
for someone trying to assassinate him.

Stephanopolous: "President Trump and his supporters have contributed
to this violent rhetoric as well"

Raddatz: "Don't forget January 6th!"
pic.twitter.com/FroBTzDAqc

- Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) July 14, 2024

And then on the print front, the day after Butler, The Atlantic ran a piece
that said that the "bloodshed Trump has done so much to incite against others
has touched him as well."

In September when there was a second assassination attempt at Trump's golf
course, you heard similar rhetoric from major media. Almost immediately after
news of that second assassination attempt broke, MSNBC anchor Alex Witt asked
political analyst Elise Jordan this:

During the first attempt on @realDonaldTrump's life, CNN and the
Atlantic blamed HIM. Now MSNBC is blaming him for a second attempt
to kill him. These are hate-filled people. They are everything they
accuse others of being.

pic.twitter.com/Wp0mcCf73E https://t.co/LctjmrWLBF

- Megan Basham (@megbasham) September 15, 2024

Also that same night, we had this from NBC anchor Lester Holt:

Lester Holt is basically saying Trump "deserved to be shot" and
"brought this on himself. He should be FIRED immediately!
pic.twitter.com/DSvUMC8cXn

- Graham Allen (@GrahamAllen_1) September 15, 2024

We need to remember that we're talking about the first Republican candidate
to win the popular vote in 20 years. So you can imagine how this struck at
least half the country. And I have to imagine there were probably people
watching who didn't vote for Trump but nonetheless found this kind of
commentary troubling.

And it's the kind of thing that is very hard to come back from. It's not a
mistake, it's a level of bias that's much more off-putting.

GEORGIA: Yes, that brings to mind some of the media commentary we've heard in
just the last couple of weeks surrounding the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO
Brian Thompson, with some minimizing the horrific crime or even making light
of it. So what's your second biggest media fail of 2024?

MEGAN: Well, I almost made this number one because it was such a systemic
failure and involved such obvious deception. And that was the media's
insistence throughout the spring and much of the summer that President Biden
was not suffering from any mental infirmity when it was obvious to the
American people that he was.

So let's look at MSNBC. In June, anchor Nicole Wallace blamed the Biden
appearances that were alarming the public on selectively edited clips.

As more and more Democratic lawmakers call for Biden to step aside,
remember that this was MSNBC's Nicole Wallace barely a month ago,
denouncing "a growing and insidious trend in right-wing media . to
take highly misleading and selectively edited videos of President
Biden . and. pic.twitter.com/7vrYTYiHU6

- Peter J. Hasson (@peterjhasson) July 19, 2024

Interesting there that Wallace tried to claim Trump was having the same
lapses, but those claims have disappeared now that the election is over.
Wallace's colleague, Joe Scarborough, also sought to assure viewers that
Biden was fine.

Joe Scarborough in March: "And F you if you can't handle the truth.
This version of Biden, intellectually, analytically, is the best
Biden ever. if it weren't the truth, I wouldn't say it."
pic.twitter.com/hdnx1IpZC2

- Peter J. Hasson (@peterjhasson) July 5, 2024

I mean the list of legacy outlets that dismissed the videos of Biden seeming
lost and confused that Americans could see with their own eyes is a really
long one. The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, the AP, and NBC all
called these videos "cheap fakes," meaning misleading edits of real video.

And when Karine Jeane-Pierre leaned into that narrative during White House
press briefings, it looked like a collaborative effort between the media and
the Biden administration.

Karine Jeane-Pierre looked you in the eye and said Biden is fine
and that the videos you saw where he is experiencing cognitive
decline were 'cheap fakes'. pic.twitter.com/DVEqPX62J7

- American Debunk (@AmericanDebunk) December 10, 2024

Well, Biden's disastrous debate performance at the end of June made it
impossible to deny his mental state and made it clear he had no chance of
winning. Then, the coverage changed immediately and many media outlets began
calling for him to step aside. Just one example, on June 21st, The New York
Times ran a story which reported that any claims that Biden was suffering
from diminished faculties were because of these cheap fakes.

Two weeks later, the day after the debate, they ran an editorial calling on
him to step down due to his mental lapses. And this was really the pattern
you saw with the legacy outlets across the board.

GEORGIA: Okay how about number three?

MEGAN: Well, I still don't think we can get away from the election yet
because the most glaring were the fact checks. Especially during the debates.

For instance, at the ABC debate between Trump and Harris, moderators David
Muir and Linsey Davis fact-checked numerous times, including when Trump was
generally correct. Like when he said, "Hard to believe, they have some states
passing legislation where you can execute the baby after birth." Davis broke
in:

Top 5 lies that the ABC News moderators refused to fact-check or
falsely fact-checked during the debate:

1. Mandatory Firearm Buybacks:

Kamala Harris told Trump to "stop lying" about her wanting to
confiscate firearms. Harris has previously stated multiple times
that she wants.
pic.twitter.com/6aXznDnq7O

- Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 11, 2024

Now this is a pretty semantic fact-check, because Harris' own running mate,
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, helped repeal a state law that required doctors
to render medical aid to a baby that survives an abortion. So in Minnesota,
doctors can let born babies die. And that has happened in at least eight
cases in that state. New York and Illinois also repealed laws that require
medical care for babies that survive abortion.

By the same token, ABC never fact-checked Harris despite the fact that Harris
made a number of false claims, like saying that there are no members of the
U.S. military on active duty in a combat zone anywhere around the world. In
fact, there are 3,000.

After the same debate, Time Magazine wrote that Trump's claim that Harris
supported funding sex changes for illegal immigrants was false. It wasn't,
and Time later had to issue a correction.

So that looked to a lot of people like glaring bias. And we saw something
similar with NBC and the vice presidential debate. Moderator Margaret Brennan
interrupted JD Vance as he was referencing undocumented immigrants in
Springfield, Ohio.



So again, a lot of viewers detected bias in that exchange.

Then there are the ethical issues in the media's favorable treatment of
Harris. MSNBC host Al Sharpton, for instance, did not disclose that the
Harris campaign made a $500,000 donation to his nonprofit right before he
conducted a softball interview with the candidate.

Meanwhile, 60 Minutes was caught having edited their interview with Harris to
make what were some pretty meandering, confusing answers to questions more
comprehensible. CBS then ignored widespread calls to release the full
transcript of the interview.

GEORGIA: So were most of these fails related to the election?

MEGAN: Definitely, because that dominated the news cycle for the year, but it
wasn't exclusively election moments. When it came to the war in Gaza, major
outlets had major egg on their faces when it was revealed that they'd been
using inaccurate statistics provided by Hamas, which has of course been
designated a terrorist group by the U.S. State Department.

Outlets like The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Guardian, CNN, the
BBC, Reuters, and AP took data disseminated by the Gaza Ministry of Health,
which is controlled by Hamas, at face value and passed it along to their
audiences. For instance, they reported fatality numbers for Palestinian women
and children that a later study found were mathematically impossible. So in
essence, they aided Hamas' PR campaign.

This kind of credulity when it comes to war coverage led to a really
embarrassing incident for CNN just recently.

On December 11th, the network ran a story from foreign correspondent Clarissa
Ward in which she encountered a man in an empty Syrian prison. He told her
he'd been detained by the Assad regime for months.

"Syria is free."

Extraordinary moment as @clarissaward and her team witness a Syrian
prisoner freed from a secret prison in Damascus.

Left alone for days without food, water or light, the man was
unaware Bashar al-Assad's regime had fallen.
pic.twitter.com/ZAnGiBlLON

- CNN International PR (@cnnipr) December 11, 2024

Well, when CNN posted the video to social media, users immediately pointed
out how inauthentic the man's appearance and behavior seemed. Like something
out of a low-budget movie.

Sure enough, within days, a Syrian fact-checking site revealed that the man
was really a former intelligence officer for the Assad government. And plenty
of people rightly questioned why CNN didn't take more time verifying the
man's identity before they rushed the story to air.

GEORGIA: Have we seen any admission from legacy outlets that these kinds of
mistakes and biases have cost them?

MEGAN: Not so much from the journalistic class, though Chris Cilizza,
formerly of CNN, did issue a mea culpa a few days ago.

In 2021, he said Republicans trying to "make Biden's mental capacity an
issue" were engaging in "lowest common denominator politics."

But on December 19th, he said this.



And a couple of their owners have. Jeff Bezos, who owns the Washington Post,
has promised that his paper will strive for more balanced coverage going
forward. So has the owner of the Los Angeles Times.

But when it comes to those actually telling the stories, their mea culpas
have mostly been forced. Sunny Hostin, co-host on ABC's "The View," had to
read a similar disclaimer only a few weeks later after comments she made
about Trump's nominee for Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth.

And I'll leave you with one more media fail, Georgia. If it's not the biggest
of the year, it's certainly the most expensive.

Back in March, during an interview with South Carolina Congresswoman Nancy
Mace, ABC Anchor George Stephanopoulos made this claim about Donald Trump
multiple times.

Nancy Mace just ended George Stephanopoulos' career, the never-Trump
media has absolutely no class! pic.twitter.com/wqEwmdn69S

- Brigitte Gabriel (@ACTBrigitte) March 10, 2024

Except, that was not true. And reportedly, Stephanopoulos' producer warned
him repeatedly, including in writing, not to make that claim on the air.
Stephanopoulos did it anyway, Trump sued, and just a few days ago, ABC agreed
to pay $16 million dollars to settle. ABC and Stephanopoulos issued a joint
statement saying they "regret" the anchor's statements regarding President
Donald J. Trump.

GEORGIA: Well, it will be interesting to see if all the bad press causes the
media to turn over a new leaf. Thanks, Megan.

MEGAN: Anytime.

--
Let's go Brandon!
Ian J. Ball
2025-01-03 16:18:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
All of them, I think.
Your Name
2025-01-03 20:20:09 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ian J. Ball
All of them, I think.
Not really the "biggest", but The New Zealand Herald obviously left the
interns in charge of the newspaper over the Christmas / New Year
holiday break. There were quite a few errors in the newspaper including
this glaring one ... not sure if it is a typo, an auto-(in)correct
alteration, a speech-to-text boo-boo, or an AI error.

According to the New Zealand Herald (27 December, 2024) article's
headline, past-US President Nixon has come back from the dead to start
merger talks with Honda. :oD

<Loading Image...>


Two other glaring errors over the holiday break include a photo caption
that said "suoer yacht" instead of "super yacht", and the headers for
the two separate sections of the Saturday newspapers were labelled as
"section A" and "section C" ("section B" is normally there, but during
holidays "B" and C" get combined in a shorter newspaper, but someone
forgot to re-label the page headers).
Rhino
2025-01-03 21:35:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Your Name
Post by Ian J. Ball
All of them, I think.
Not really the "biggest", but The New Zealand Herald obviously left the
interns in charge of the newspaper over the Christmas / New Year holiday
break. There were quite a few errors in the newspaper including this
glaring one ... not sure if it is a typo, an auto-(in)correct
alteration, a speech-to-text boo-boo, or an AI error.
According to the New Zealand Herald (27 December, 2024) article's
headline, past-US President Nixon has come back from the dead to start
merger talks with Honda.  :oD
<https://i.imgur.com/QZdzCYv.jpeg>
Two other glaring errors over the holiday break include a photo caption
that said "suoer yacht" instead of "super yacht", and the headers for
the two separate sections of the Saturday newspapers were labelled as
"section A" and "section C" ("section B" is normally there, but during
holidays "B" and C" get combined in a shorter newspaper, but someone
forgot to re-label the page headers).
The number of typos and grammar errors in online newspapers - *many*
different publications - has been particularly bad of late. They used to
employ proof-readers but those apparently went the way of the dodo years
ago. I don't know who checks copy before publication any more. I could
easily be persuaded that NO ONE checks it all: the original "journalist"
writes the story, possibly relying on software to check spelling and
grammar, and whatever software they are using simply sucks or gets
overridden by the "journalist" when it does flag an error.

I posted here a few years back about a young woman who was working at a
magazine who was asked by her editor to make a couple of small changes
in an article she (the young woman) had written, including fixing the
spelling of "hampster" but the young woman insisted that it was spelled
with a 'p', even when the editor politely showed her otherwise in a
dictionary. Rather than graciously admitting her error, the young woman
called her mother at work and demanded that her mother tell the editor
that she (the daughter) should be allowed to spell "hamster" with a 'p'
- and the mother actually had a verbal battle with the editor to defend
her daughter's misspelling! I want to believe that this sort of thing is
just a one-off fluke but I'm really not sure.

On another occasion, I read an article about a scientist in Antarctica
needing an emergency flight back to civilization to deal with a serious
medical issue. The writer of the article described the rescue flight
starting from Chile, proceeding to Edmonton, Alberta, then to
Antarctica, then finally to the hospital that treated the stricken
scientist. The sheer illogic of that routing was blindingly obvious to
anyone with even a distant grasp of geography that it boggled my mind. I
wrote an email to the publication and soon got a reply from an editor
who apologized for the article and agreed that the proper routing was
Edmonton to Chile to Antarctica and then finally to the hospital. He
apologized that he'd been off for several days and that in this small
publication he had no backup to oversee the young "journalists" he
employed so he left them to edit their own work in his absence.

Young people are so mal-educated that they have only a limited grasp of
spelling, grammar, and even geography. How can we possibly be surprised
by egregious errors in publications?
--
Rhino
The Horny Goat
2025-01-04 03:48:17 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 16:35:14 -0500, Rhino
Post by Rhino
I posted here a few years back about a young woman who was working at a
magazine who was asked by her editor to make a couple of small changes
in an article she (the young woman) had written, including fixing the
spelling of "hampster" but the young woman insisted that it was spelled
with a 'p', even when the editor politely showed her otherwise in a
dictionary. Rather than graciously admitting her error, the young woman
called her mother at work and demanded that her mother tell the editor
that she (the daughter) should be allowed to spell "hamster" with a 'p'
- and the mother actually had a verbal battle with the editor to defend
her daughter's misspelling! I want to believe that this sort of thing is
just a one-off fluke but I'm really not sure.
My daughter (who lives with me) has been working from home 4 days a
week (1 day downtown) since 2021 and I can't imagine talking to her
employers except in the context of a major health crisis.

She's 35 years old, bright and barring an emergency situation can
speak for herself.

The idea of using me as a spell checker is ridiculous even though my
spelling is pretty good.
Rhino
2025-01-04 22:05:16 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by The Horny Goat
On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 16:35:14 -0500, Rhino
Post by Rhino
I posted here a few years back about a young woman who was working at a
magazine who was asked by her editor to make a couple of small changes
in an article she (the young woman) had written, including fixing the
spelling of "hampster" but the young woman insisted that it was spelled
with a 'p', even when the editor politely showed her otherwise in a
dictionary. Rather than graciously admitting her error, the young woman
called her mother at work and demanded that her mother tell the editor
that she (the daughter) should be allowed to spell "hamster" with a 'p'
- and the mother actually had a verbal battle with the editor to defend
her daughter's misspelling! I want to believe that this sort of thing is
just a one-off fluke but I'm really not sure.
My daughter (who lives with me) has been working from home 4 days a
week (1 day downtown) since 2021 and I can't imagine talking to her
employers except in the context of a major health crisis.
She's 35 years old, bright and barring an emergency situation can
speak for herself.
The idea of using me as a spell checker is ridiculous even though my
spelling is pretty good.
I can't believe that the young woman in the anecdote still insisted on
spelling it "hampster" even after having been shown the correct spelling
in a reference book by her boss and then doubling down by getting her
mom to try to defend the misspelling.

This speaks of some truly bizarre things in her schooling, like teachers
who insisted that all spelling is arbitrary and that it was perfectly
okay to spell words any way you like because others will surely
understand what you mean and making you spell in some standard way is
"oppressive" in some way.

That is essentially what the ideologues in the Ontario Ministry of
Education decided about the time I started high school because that is
exactly when they stopped teaching spelling or grammar and stopped
docking you marks for spelling or grammar errors in your school work. In
grades 7 and 8, we had a full class each and every day on spelling and
grammar. In all of high school - and we had 5 years of high school in
Ontario until about 20 years back - I had a single 40 minute lecture
that looked at grammar in the entire 5 years.
--
Rhino
The Horny Goat
2025-01-05 18:26:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:05:16 -0500, Rhino
Post by Rhino
That is essentially what the ideologues in the Ontario Ministry of
Education decided about the time I started high school because that is
exactly when they stopped teaching spelling or grammar and stopped
docking you marks for spelling or grammar errors in your school work. In
grades 7 and 8, we had a full class each and every day on spelling and
grammar. In all of high school - and we had 5 years of high school in
Ontario until about 20 years back - I had a single 40 minute lecture
that looked at grammar in the entire 5 years.
Figured you had since I know you're older than my brother in law (who
is 11 years younger than me) who was part of Ontario's last grade 13
class. (His sister who is 3 years younger did not)

BC also had grade 13 for a few years but ended it before I got there.
moviePig
2025-01-03 22:08:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Your Name
Post by Ian J. Ball
All of them, I think.
Not really the "biggest", but The New Zealand Herald obviously left the
interns in charge of the newspaper over the Christmas / New Year holiday
break. There were quite a few errors in the newspaper including this
glaring one ... not sure if it is a typo, an auto-(in)correct
alteration, a speech-to-text boo-boo, or an AI error.
According to the New Zealand Herald (27 December, 2024) article's
headline, past-US President Nixon has come back from the dead to start
merger talks with Honda.  :oD
<https://i.imgur.com/QZdzCYv.jpeg>
Two other glaring errors over the holiday break include a photo caption
that said "suoer yacht" instead of "super yacht", and the headers for
the two separate sections of the Saturday newspapers were labelled as
"section A" and "section C" ("section B" is normally there, but during
holidays "B" and C" get combined in a shorter newspaper, but someone
forgot to re-label the page headers).
Maybe speech-to-text got "suoer yacht" from "sewer rat"...
Your Name
2025-01-03 23:29:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by moviePig
Post by Your Name
Post by Ian J. Ball
All of them, I think.
Not really the "biggest", but The New Zealand Herald obviously left the
interns in charge of the newspaper over the Christmas / New Year
holiday break. There were quite a few errors in the newspaper including
this glaring one ... not sure if it is a typo, an auto-(in)correct
alteration, a speech-to-text boo-boo, or an AI error.
According to the New Zealand Herald (27 December, 2024) article's
headline, past-US President Nixon has come back from the dead to start
merger talks with Honda.  :oD
<https://i.imgur.com/QZdzCYv.jpeg>
Two other glaring errors over the holiday break include a photo caption
that said "suoer yacht" instead of "super yacht", and the headers for
the two separate sections of the Saturday newspapers were labelled as
"section A" and "section C" ("section B" is normally there, but during
holidays "B" and C" get combined in a shorter newspaper, but someone
forgot to re-label the page headers).
Maybe speech-to-text got "suoer yacht" from "sewer rat"...
That one is more likely just a typo thanks to o and p being next to
each other on the keyboard - the caption was for photo of a large boat.

But "Nixon" for "Nissan" could well be auto-(in)correct or
speech-to-text with the pronounciation of "Niss-an" (rather than the
Americanised "knee-san").
The Horny Goat
2025-01-04 03:49:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by moviePig
Maybe speech-to-text got "suoer yacht" from "sewer rat"...
I confess I was wondering which dictionary provided a spell checker
that included "suoer" in it. Had she said "OMG - I'll fix this right
away" I'd bet a dollar to a donut none of us would ever have heard of
the case.
The Horny Goat
2025-01-04 03:43:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ubiquitous
Except, that was not true. And reportedly, Stephanopoulos' producer warned
him repeatedly, including in writing, not to make that claim on the air.
Stephanopoulos did it anyway, Trump sued, and just a few days ago, ABC agreed
to pay $16 million dollars to settle. ABC and Stephanopoulos issued a joint
statement saying they "regret" the anchor's statements regarding President
Donald J. Trump.
So 16 million regrets (plus legal fees) eh?
Rhino
2025-01-04 22:09:33 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by The Horny Goat
Post by Ubiquitous
Except, that was not true. And reportedly, Stephanopoulos' producer warned
him repeatedly, including in writing, not to make that claim on the air.
Stephanopoulos did it anyway, Trump sued, and just a few days ago, ABC agreed
to pay $16 million dollars to settle. ABC and Stephanopoulos issued a joint
statement saying they "regret" the anchor's statements regarding President
Donald J. Trump.
So 16 million regrets (plus legal fees) eh?
The fact that Stephanopoulos said it anyway - AGAINST the written orders
of his supervisors, who presumably consulted lawyers - makes me rather
surprised he still has a job. There would be seem to be ample grounds to
dismiss him for cause. At the very least, his salary should be docked
until he's paid back the amount of the settlement.
--
Rhino
Danart
2025-01-05 22:29:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Ubiquitous
: The following is an edited transcript of an interview betwee
Mornin
Post by Ubiquitous
: Wire host Georgia Howe and Daily Wire culture reporter Mega
Basha
Post by Ubiquitous
: on a New Year's Day edition of Morning Wire
2024 saw Americans' trust in the legacy media sink to all-tim
lows,
Post by Ubiquitous
contributing to massive layoffs and loss of audience among some o
the
Post by Ubiquitous
biggest news outlets. These were the media's failures over the las
year that
Post by Ubiquitous
likely played a role in this lack of trust.
GEORGIA: Daily Wire culture reporter Megan Basham joins us now t
look back
Post by Ubiquitous
at the year's biggest media fails that are contributing to th
public's
Post by Ubiquitous
record-low trust. But Megan, before we get to that, can you give u
a quick
Post by Ubiquitous
overview of where the industry stands now? Along with a lot o
controversies
Post by Ubiquitous
and corrections, there was also a lot of contraction for a
election year
Post by Ubiquitous
when you typically see news departments expanding
MEGAN: Yeah, the media landscape looks bad. Really bad. If yo
remember,
Post by Ubiquitous
Georgia, right before the start of the year we saw substantia
layoffs at The
Post by Ubiquitous
Washington Post, The New York Times, and NPR. And as you said
that's not
Post by Ubiquitous
what you expect to see heading into a major campaign year, whe
media
Post by Ubiquitous
revenues tend to increase
Then in January, the Los Angeles Times cut more than 20% of it
newsroom.
Post by Ubiquitous
Time Magazine cut 15%. And that bad news just continued throughou
2024. In
Post by Ubiquitous
the summer, CNN laid off 100 people. And they're now reportedl
planning to
Post by Ubiquitous
lay off hundreds more. Comcast may sell MSNBC
And neither of those developments is surprising when you look a
some of the
Post by Ubiquitous
cable news ratings. They're a dumpster fire. According to Nielse
data, MSNBC
Post by Ubiquitous
is still down by more than half of what it was averaging up t
election
Post by Ubiquitous
night, and CNN is down by slightly less than half, though it didn'
have as
Post by Ubiquitous
far to fall because it was already at the bottom of the pack
Fox News ratings are way up this year. They're now beating th
ratings of the
Post by Ubiquitous
other cable news outlets combined, suggesting a lot of former CN
and MSNBC
Post by Ubiquitous
viewers are flocking there
GEORGIA: Well let's talk about some of the coverage that's likel
driving a
Post by Ubiquitous
lot of the legacy media's poor performance. When you look back ove
the year,
Post by Ubiquitous
what are the biggest standouts to you
MEGAN: For me, the biggest one wasn't an issue where there wa
clear
Post by Ubiquitous
deception or inaccuracy, but just appallingly callous coverage o
the most
Post by Ubiquitous
momentous moment of the campaign. And that was the response to th
attempt on
Post by Ubiquitous
President-elect Donald Trump's life at a rally in Butler
Pennsylvania on
Post by Ubiquitous
July 13th.
That very same night, ABC viewers heard George Stephanopoulos an
Martha
Post by Ubiquitous
Raddatz, in part, blaming the victim.
These mainstream media hacks are SICK. They're already blamin
Trump
Post by Ubiquitous
for someone trying to assassinate him
Stephanopolous: "President Trump and his supporters hav
contributed
Post by Ubiquitous
to this violent rhetoric as well
Raddatz: "Don't forget January 6th!
pic.twitter.com/FroBTzDAq
And then on the print front, the day after Butler, The Atlantic ra
a piece
Post by Ubiquitous
that said that the "bloodshed Trump has done so much to incit
against others
Post by Ubiquitous
has touched him as well.
In September when there was a second assassination attempt a
Trump's golf
Post by Ubiquitous
course, you heard similar rhetoric from major media. Almos
immediately after
Post by Ubiquitous
news of that second assassination attempt broke, MSNBC anchor Ale
Witt asked
Post by Ubiquitous
Atlantic blamed HIM. Now MSNBC is blaming him for a second attemp
to kill him. These are hate-filled people. They are everythin
they
Post by Ubiquitous
accuse others of being
pic.twitter.com/Wp0mcCf73E https://t.co/LctjmrWLB
Also that same night, we had this from NBC anchor Lester Holt
Lester Holt is basically saying Trump "deserved to be
shot" and
Post by Ubiquitous
"brought this on himself. He should be FIRED immediately!
pic.twitter.com/DSvUMC8cXn
We need to remember that we're talking about the first Republican candidate
to win the popular vote in 20 years. So you can imagine how this struck at
least half the country. And I have to imagine there were probably people
watching who didn't vote for Trump but nonetheless found this kind of
commentary troubling.
And it's the kind of thing that is very hard to come back from. It's not a
mistake, it's a level of bias that's much more off-putting.
GEORGIA: Yes, that brings to mind some of the media commentary
we've heard in
Post by Ubiquitous
just the last couple of weeks surrounding the murder of
UnitedHealthcare CEO
Post by Ubiquitous
Brian Thompson, with some minimizing the horrific crime or even making light
of it. So what's your second biggest media fail of 2024?
MEGAN: Well, I almost made this number one because it was such a systemic
failure and involved such obvious deception. And that was the
media's
Post by Ubiquitous
insistence throughout the spring and much of the summer that
President Biden
Post by Ubiquitous
was not suffering from any mental infirmity when it was obvious to the
American people that he was.
So let's look at MSNBC. In June, anchor Nicole Wallace blamed the Biden
appearances that were alarming the public on selectively edited clips.
As more and more Democratic lawmakers call for Biden to step
aside,
Post by Ubiquitous
remember that this was MSNBC's Nicole Wallace barely a month ago,
denouncing "a growing and insidious trend in right-wing media
. to
Post by Ubiquitous
take highly misleading and selectively edited videos of President
Biden . and. pic.twitter.com/7vrYTYiHU6
Interesting there that Wallace tried to claim Trump was having the same
lapses, but those claims have disappeared now that the election is over.
Wallace's colleague, Joe Scarborough, also sought to assure viewers that
Biden was fine.
Joe Scarborough in March: "And F you if you can't handle the
truth.
Post by Ubiquitous
This version of Biden, intellectually, analytically, is the best
Biden ever. if it weren't the truth, I wouldn't say it."
pic.twitter.com/hdnx1IpZC2
I mean the list of legacy outlets that dismissed the videos of
Biden seeming
Post by Ubiquitous
lost and confused that Americans could see with their own eyes is a really
long one. The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, the AP, and NBC all
called these videos "cheap fakes," meaning misleading
edits of real video.
Post by Ubiquitous
And when Karine Jeane-Pierre leaned into that narrative during
White House
Post by Ubiquitous
press briefings, it looked like a collaborative effort between the media and
the Biden administration.
Karine Jeane-Pierre looked you in the eye and said Biden is fine
and that the videos you saw where he is experiencing cognitive
decline were 'cheap fakes'. pic.twitter.com/DVEqPX62J7
Well, Biden's disastrous debate performance at the end of June made it
impossible to deny his mental state and made it clear he had no chance of
winning. Then, the coverage changed immediately and many media
outlets began
Post by Ubiquitous
calling for him to step aside. Just one example, on June 21st, The New York
Times ran a story which reported that any claims that Biden was suffering
from diminished faculties were because of these cheap fakes.
Two weeks later, the day after the debate, they ran an editorial calling on
him to step down due to his mental lapses. And this was really the pattern
you saw with the legacy outlets across the board.
GEORGIA: Okay how about number three?
MEGAN: Well, I still don't think we can get away from the election yet
because the most glaring were the fact checks. Especially during the debates.
For instance, at the ABC debate between Trump and Harris,
moderators David
Post by Ubiquitous
Muir and Linsey Davis fact-checked numerous times, including when Trump was
generally correct. Like when he said, "Hard to believe, they
have some states
Post by Ubiquitous
passing legislation where you can execute the baby after
birth." Davis broke
Post by Ubiquitous
Top 5 lies that the ABC News moderators refused to fact-check or
Kamala Harris told Trump to "stop lying" about her
wanting to
Post by Ubiquitous
confiscate firearms. Harris has previously stated multiple times
that she wants.
pic.twitter.com/6aXznDnq7O
Now this is a pretty semantic fact-check, because Harris' own
running mate,
Post by Ubiquitous
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, helped repeal a state law that
required doctors
Post by Ubiquitous
to render medical aid to a baby that survives an abortion. So in Minnesota,
doctors can let born babies die. And that has happened in at least eight
cases in that state. New York and Illinois also repealed laws that require
medical care for babies that survive abortion.
By the same token, ABC never fact-checked Harris despite the fact that Harris
made a number of false claims, like saying that there are no
members of the
Post by Ubiquitous
U.S. military on active duty in a combat zone anywhere around the world. In
fact, there are 3,000.
After the same debate, Time Magazine wrote that Trump's claim that Harris
supported funding sex changes for illegal immigrants was false. It wasn't,
and Time later had to issue a correction.
So that looked to a lot of people like glaring bias. And we saw something
similar with NBC and the vice presidential debate. Moderator
Margaret Brennan
Post by Ubiquitous
interrupted JD Vance as he was referencing undocumented immigrants in
Springfield, Ohio.
http://youtu.be/ipxF918BjWQ
So again, a lot of viewers detected bias in that exchange.
Then there are the ethical issues in the media's favorable
treatment of
Post by Ubiquitous
Harris. MSNBC host Al Sharpton, for instance, did not disclose that the
Harris campaign made a $500,000 donation to his nonprofit right before he
conducted a softball interview with the candidate.
Meanwhile, 60 Minutes was caught having edited their interview with Harris to
make what were some pretty meandering, confusing answers to
questions more
Post by Ubiquitous
comprehensible. CBS then ignored widespread calls to release the full
transcript of the interview.
GEORGIA: So were most of these fails related to the election?
MEGAN: Definitely, because that dominated the news cycle for the year, but it
wasn't exclusively election moments. When it came to the war in Gaza, major
outlets had major egg on their faces when it was revealed that
they'd been
Post by Ubiquitous
using inaccurate statistics provided by Hamas, which has of course been
designated a terrorist group by the U.S. State Department.
Outlets like The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Guardian, CNN, the
BBC, Reuters, and AP took data disseminated by the Gaza Ministry of Health,
which is controlled by Hamas, at face value and passed it along to their
audiences. For instance, they reported fatality numbers for
Palestinian women
Post by Ubiquitous
and children that a later study found were mathematically
impossible. So in
Post by Ubiquitous
essence, they aided Hamas' PR campaign.
This kind of credulity when it comes to war coverage led to a
really
Post by Ubiquitous
embarrassing incident for CNN just recently.
On December 11th, the network ran a story from foreign
correspondent Clarissa
Post by Ubiquitous
Ward in which she encountered a man in an empty Syrian prison. He told her
he'd been detained by the Assad regime for months.
"Syria is free."
Syrian
Post by Ubiquitous
prisoner freed from a secret prison in Damascus.
Left alone for days without food, water or light, the man was
unaware Bashar al-Assad's regime had fallen.
pic.twitter.com/ZAnGiBlLON
Well, when CNN posted the video to social media, users immediately pointed
out how inauthentic the man's appearance and behavior seemed. Like something
out of a low-budget movie.
Sure enough, within days, a Syrian fact-checking site revealed that the man
was really a former intelligence officer for the Assad government. And plenty
of people rightly questioned why CNN didn't take more time
verifying the
Post by Ubiquitous
man's identity before they rushed the story to air.
GEORGIA: Have we seen any admission from legacy outlets that these kinds of
mistakes and biases have cost them?
MEGAN: Not so much from the journalistic class, though Chris
Cilizza,
Post by Ubiquitous
formerly of CNN, did issue a mea culpa a few days ago.
In 2021, he said Republicans trying to "make Biden's mental
capacity an
Post by Ubiquitous
issue" were engaging in "lowest common denominator
politics."
Post by Ubiquitous
But on December 19th, he said this.
http://youtu.be/_WQKveT8Bzo
And a couple of their owners have. Jeff Bezos, who owns the
Washington Post,
Post by Ubiquitous
has promised that his paper will strive for more balanced coverage going
forward. So has the owner of the Los Angeles Times.
But when it comes to those actually telling the stories, their mea culpas
have mostly been forced. Sunny Hostin, co-host on ABC's "The
View," had to
Post by Ubiquitous
read a similar disclaimer only a few weeks later after comments she made
about Trump's nominee for Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth.
And I'll leave you with one more media fail, Georgia. If it's not the biggest
of the year, it's certainly the most expensive.
Back in March, during an interview with South Carolina
Congresswoman Nancy
Post by Ubiquitous
Mace, ABC Anchor George Stephanopoulos made this claim about Donald Trump
multiple times.
Nancy Mace just ended George Stephanopoulos' career, the
never-Trump
Post by Ubiquitous
media has absolutely no class! pic.twitter.com/wqEwmdn69S
Except, that was not true. And reportedly, Stephanopoulos' producer warned
him repeatedly, including in writing, not to make that claim on the air.
Stephanopoulos did it anyway, Trump sued, and just a few days ago, ABC agreed
to pay $16 million dollars to settle. ABC and Stephanopoulos issued a joint
statement saying they "regret" the anchor's statements
regarding President
Post by Ubiquitous
Donald J. Trump.
GEORGIA: Well, it will be interesting to see if all the bad press causes the
media to turn over a new leaf. Thanks, Megan.
MEGAN: Anytime.
--
Let's go Brandon!
When stories are being censored and the
media is like "Do not say Palestinians say Hamas" do we
really care?

Guy get fired for saying and speaking the truth.


This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=681335744#681335744

Loading...