Pelosi Admits It: Illegals Voting is the Ultimate Goal

Discussion:

Add Reply

BTR1701

2024-09-02 01:54:35 UTC

They want amnesty and citizenship for the millions they’ve let flood in
Because they want them voting. Don’t be fooled.

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1829706892601368577/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/bXXgftvwMSiy0_Fj.mp4?tag=12

Hey, Nance, 'memba when you and Chuckie Schumer were against illega
immigration?

I 'memba!

https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1829721277679972352/pu/vid/avc1/624x576/_BzdmtvP9nTrVu8w.mp4?tag=12

moviePig

2024-09-02 02:28:43 UTC

Permalink

They want amnesty and citizenship for the millions they’ve let flood in.
Because they want them voting. Don’t be fooled.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1829706892601368577/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/bXXgftvwMSiy0_Fj.mp4?tag=12
Hey, Nance, 'memba when you and Chuckie Schumer were against illegal
immigration?
I 'memba!
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1829721277679972352/pu/vid/avc1/624x576/_BzdmtvP9nTrVu8w.mp4?tag=12

Pretty sure that, whether then or now, no public figure openly favors
"illegal immigration".

BTR1701

2024-09-02 02:58:42 UTC

Permalink

Post by moviePig

Pretty sure that, whether then or now, no public figure openly favors
"illegal immigration".

It's hard to more openly favor it than pretending our southern border doesn'
exist like Joe and Kammie have for the last four years:

Sending heavy construction equipment to tear down fences and barriers-- tha
were actually working-- put up by the border states to stem the hordes.

The only legal action they've taken regarding the border is suing any stat
that attempts to stop Harris's throw-open-the-doors-and-let-them-flood-i
policy.

Literally sending American planes to cities around the Southern Hemisphere an
loading them up with illegals, flying them here, and then letting them go wit
debit cards full of American tax money.

trotsky

2024-09-02 09:36:04 UTC

Permalink

Post by moviePig

Pretty sure that, whether then or now, no public figure openly favors
"illegal immigration".

It's hard to more openly favor it than pretending our southern border doesn't

Wait, isn't this Trump's fault because he was too impotent to get Mexico
to pay for a wall? By Jove I think it is! And not only are you too
scared shitless to talk about Trump, you're too scared shitless to even
admit that you're too scared shitless! How's that for a Catch 22?

trotsky

2024-09-02 18:39:11 UTC

Permalink

Post by moviePig

Pretty sure that, whether then or now, no public figure openly favors
"illegal immigration".

It's hard to more openly favor it than pretending our southern border doesn't
Sending heavy construction equipment to tear down fences and barriers-- that
were actually working-- put up by the border states to stem the hordes.
The only legal action they've taken regarding the border is suing any state
that attempts to stop Harris's throw-open-the-doors-and-let-them-flood-in
policy.
Literally sending American planes to cities around the Southern Hemisphere and
loading them up with illegals, flying them here, and then letting them go with
debit cards full of American tax money.

Holy shit, that does sound bad--but how the fuck are they "illegal" just
for getting on a plane? That literally sounds like your brain was
decimated by going off a cliff.

moviePig

2024-09-02 19:47:40 UTC

Permalink

Post by moviePig

Pretty sure that, whether then or now, no public figure openly favors
"illegal immigration".

Ah, I see. It's your *equivalence* version of "illegal immigration"...

BTR1701

2024-09-02 21:51:48 UTC

Pretty sure that, whether then or now, no public figure openly favors
"illegal immigration".

It's hard to more openly favor it than pretending our southern borde
doesn't
Sending heavy construction equipment to tear down fences and barriers-- that
were actually working-- put up by the border states to stem the hordes.
The only legal action they've taken regarding the border is suing any state
that attempts to stop Harris's throw-open-the-doors-and-let-them-flood-in
policy.
Literally sending American planes to cities around the Southern Hemispher
and
loading them up with illegals, flying them here, and then letting them g
with
debit cards full of American tax money.

Ah, I see. It's your *equivalence* version of "illegal immigration"...

No, it actually is illegal immigration. If a person or organization was doin
the things the federal government has been doing for the last four years
they'd be charged with aiding and abetting the violation of federal law. Bu
if Joe Biden does it, for some reason it's not a crime, even though there's n
"unless ordered by the president" escape clause in the statute.

moviePig

2024-09-02 22:16:54 UTC

Permalink

Post by moviePig

Pretty sure that, whether then or now, no public figure openly favors
"illegal immigration".

Ah, I see. It's your *equivalence* version of "illegal immigration"...

No, it actually is illegal immigration. If a person or organization was doing
the things the federal government has been doing for the last four years,
they'd be charged with aiding and abetting the violation of federal law. But
if Joe Biden does it, for some reason it's not a crime, even though there's no
"unless ordered by the president" escape clause in the statute.

So, you say they're for "illegal immigration" even if they think they
aren't. Just trying to clarify the nature of your claim.

BTR1701

2024-09-04 18:38:06 UTC

Pretty sure that, whether then or now, no public figure openly favors
"illegal immigration".

It's hard to more openly favor it than pretending our southern border
Sending heavy construction equipment to tear down fences and barriers-- that
were actually working-- put up by the border states to stem the hordes.
The only legal action they've taken regarding the border is suing any state
that attempts to stop Harris's throw-open-the-doors-and-let-them-flood-in
policy.
Literally sending American planes to cities around the Southern Hemisphere
and loading them up with illegals, flying them here, and then letting
them go
with debit cards full of American tax money.

Ah, I see. It's your *equivalence* version of "illegal immigration"...

So, you say they're for "illegal immigration" even if they think they
aren't. Just trying to clarify the nature of your claim.

I have no idea what you're talking about. Pelosi (and Kammie) know full well
that the millions they've let flood into the country are doing so illegally,
contrary to law. And they know that the federal assistance they provided them
in doing so is also illegal. They just don't care because it serves the
Agenda. The only reason Pelosi is concerned with making them legal is so they
can get into those voting booths and start checking the boxes for people with
(D)s after their names.

moviePig

2024-09-04 22:18:40 UTC

Pretty sure that, whether then or now, no public figure openly favors
"illegal immigration".

Ah, I see. It's your *equivalence* version of "illegal immigration"...

So, you say they're for "illegal immigration" even if they think they
aren't. Just trying to clarify the nature of your claim.

What I'm talking about is your claim that they were once *against*
illegal immigration and are now *for* it ...as if their publicly stated
opinions had (gasp) flip-flopped. I repeat: No public figure openly
favors "illegal immigration".

BTR1701

2024-09-04 22:37:19 UTC

Pretty sure that, whether then or now, no public figure openly favors
"illegal immigration".

Ah, I see. It's your *equivalence* version of "illegal immigration"...

No, it actually is illegal immigration. If a person or organization was
doing the things the federal government has been doing for the last four
years,
they'd be charged with aiding and abetting the violation of federal law. But
if Joe Biden does it, for some reason it's not a crime, even though there's
no "unless ordered by the president" escape clause in the statute.

So, you say they're for "illegal immigration" even if they think they
aren't. Just trying to clarify the nature of your claim.

What I'm talking about is your claim that they were once *against*
illegal immigration and are now *for* it ...as if their publicly stated
opinions had (gasp) flip-flopped.

It has unless they were lying back then. The second clip I provided above
shows their positions have done a complete 180 on illegal immigration. They
were once unequivocally opposed to it. Now Nancy not only welcomes it, she
wants to give them perks actual U.S. citizens don't enjoy.

trotsky

2024-09-05 09:26:51 UTC

Pretty sure that, whether then or now, no public figure openly favors
"illegal immigration".

Ah, I see. It's your *equivalence* version of "illegal immigration"...

No, it actually is illegal immigration. If a person or organization was
doing the things the federal government has been doing for the last four
years,
they'd be charged with aiding and abetting the violation of federal law. But
if Joe Biden does it, for some reason it's not a crime, even though there's
no "unless ordered by the president" escape clause in the statute.

So, you say they're for "illegal immigration" even if they think they
aren't. Just trying to clarify the nature of your claim.

What I'm talking about is your claim that they were once *against*
illegal immigration and are now *for* it ...as if their publicly stated
opinions had (gasp) flip-flopped.

Did white people get permission from Native Americans to immigrate here?
You're literally invoking white supremacy with your xenophobic
bullshit. And you literally didn't used to be this stupid, but your
indoctrination has dropped your IQ by roughly 50 points.

The Horny Goat

2024-09-06 06:22:47 UTC

Permalink

Post by BTR1701
It has unless they were lying back then. The second clip I provided above
shows their positions have done a complete 180 on illegal immigration. They
were once unequivocally opposed to it. Now Nancy not only welcomes it, she
wants to give them perks actual U.S. citizens don't enjoy.

Shameful.

If they're going to do that then that's just encouraging more of the
same which given who politicians allegedly work for (e.g. "the
American people") is disgusting.

trotsky

2024-09-05 09:22:54 UTC

On Sep 1, 2024 at 7:28:43 PM PDT, "moviePig"

They want amnesty and citizenship for the millions they’ve let
flood in.
Because they want them voting. Don’t be fooled.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1829706892601368577/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/bXXgftvwMSiy0_Fj.mp4?tag=12
Hey, Nance, 'memba when you and Chuckie Schumer were against
illegal
immigration?
I 'memba!
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1829721277679972352/pu/vid/avc1/624x576/_BzdmtvP9nTrVu8w.mp4?tag=12

Pretty sure that, whether then or now, no public figure openly
favors
"illegal immigration".

It's hard to more openly favor it than pretending our southern
border
Sending heavy construction equipment to tear down fences and
barriers-- that
were actually working-- put up by the border states to stem the
hordes.
The only legal action they've taken regarding the border is
suing any state
that attempts to stop Harris's
throw-open-the-doors-and-let-them-flood-in
policy.
Literally sending American planes to cities around the Southern
Hemisphere
and loading them up with illegals, flying them here, and then
letting
them go
with debit cards full of American tax money.

Ah, I see. It's your *equivalence* version of "illegal
immigration"...

No, it actually is illegal immigration. If a person or
organization was
doing
the things the federal government has been doing for the last four
years,
they'd be charged with aiding and abetting the violation of
federal law. But
if Joe Biden does it, for some reason it's not a crime, even
though there's
no
"unless ordered by the president" escape clause in the statute.

So, you say they're for "illegal immigration" even if they think they
aren't. Just trying to clarify the nature of your claim.

Hey if you're responding to what Twat says about Pelosi and Harris know
"full well" you're enabling his bullshit. Why do this?

trotsky

2024-09-05 09:02:06 UTC

Pretty sure that, whether then or now, no public figure openly favors
"illegal immigration".

Ah, I see. It's your *equivalence* version of "illegal immigration"...

So, you say they're for "illegal immigration" even if they think they
aren't. Just trying to clarify the nature of your claim.

I have no idea what you're talking about. Pelosi (and Kammie) know full well

Prove you have any way of knowing anything they know "full well."
You're talking out of your ass because you know that's where your best
ideas come from.

BTR1701

2024-09-04 16:09:53 UTC

Pretty sure that, whether then or now, no public figure openly favors
"illegal immigration".

It's hard to more openly favor it than pretending our southern border
Sending heavy construction equipment to tear down fences and barriers-- that
were actually working-- put up by the border states to stem the hordes.
The only legal action they've taken regarding the border is suing any state
that attempts to stop Harris's throw-open-the-doors-and-let-them-flood-in
policy.
Literally sending American planes to cities around the Southern Hemisphere
and loading them up with illegals, flying them here, and then lettin
them go
with debit cards full of American tax money.

Ah, I see. It's your *equivalence* version of "illegal immigration"...

No, it actually is illegal immigration. If a person or organization wa
doing
the things the federal government has been doing for the last four years,
they'd be charged with aiding and abetting the violation of federal law. But
if Joe Biden does it, for some reason it's not a crime, even though there'
no
"unless ordered by the president" escape clause in the statute.

So, you say they're for "illegal immigration" even if they think they
aren't.

I don't know what you're talking about. Pelosi (and Kammie) knows that thes
people are breaking the law by entering the country contrary to law. She know
the federal government is aiding and abetting the violation of the law. Sh
just doesn't care because it serves the Agenda and the only reason she eve
wants to legalize them is so they can step into that voting booth and chec
the boxes with (D)s after the names.

trotsky

2024-09-05 08:46:57 UTC

Pretty sure that, whether then or now, no public figure openly favors
"illegal immigration".

Ah, I see. It's your *equivalence* version of "illegal immigration"...

So, you say they're for "illegal immigration" even if they think they
aren't.

I don't know what you're talking about.

Shouldn't this be your sig. line?

trotsky

2024-09-03 08:18:09 UTC

Permalink

Post by moviePig

Pretty sure that, whether then or now, no public figure openly favors
"illegal immigration".

Ah, I see. It's your *equivalence* version of "illegal immigration"...

This from the guy who belongs to the insurrection party. You have all
the credibility of a sea slug.

trotsky

2024-09-03 08:06:15 UTC

Permalink

Post by moviePig

They want amnesty and citizenship for the millions they’ve let
flood in.
Because they want them voting. Don’t be fooled.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1829706892601368577/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/bXXgftvwMSiy0_Fj.mp4?tag=12
Hey, Nance, 'memba when you and Chuckie Schumer were against illegal
immigration?
I 'memba!
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1829721277679972352/pu/vid/avc1/624x576/_BzdmtvP9nTrVu8w.mp4?tag=12

Pretty sure that, whether then or now, no public figure openly favors
"illegal immigration".

It's hard to more openly favor it than pretending our southern border doesn't
Sending heavy construction equipment to tear down fences and
barriers-- that
were actually working-- put up by the border states to stem the hordes.
The only legal action they've taken regarding the border is suing any state
that attempts to stop Harris's throw-open-the-doors-and-let-them-flood-in
policy.
Literally sending American planes to cities around the Southern Hemisphere and
loading them up with illegals, flying them here, and then letting them go with
debit cards full of American tax money.

Ah, I see. It's your *equivalence* version of "illegal immigration"...

If only his posts came with a secret decoder ring.

Pluted Pup

2024-09-03 23:21:25 UTC

Permalink

Post by moviePig

They want amnesty and citizenship for the millions they´ve let flood in.
Because they want them voting. Don´t be fooled.
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1829706892601368577/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/bXXgftvwMSiy0_Fj.mp4?tag=12
Hey, Nance, 'memba when you and Chuckie Schumer were against illegal
immigration?
I 'memba!
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1829721277679972352/pu/vid/avc1/624x576/_BzdmtvP9nTrVu8w.mp4?tag=12

Pretty sure that, whether then or now, no public figure openly favors
"illegal immigration".

The term "illegal immigration" has been outlawed by
The New York Times and the Associated Press so how
would you even know? A politician who advocated
"illegal immigration" explicitly would be quoted in
the news with their words translated to"immigration".

Would you ever accuse these news sources of being
misleading? Their reputation is very high.

In likewise fashion the problem of drug addiction
has disappeared: these same sources have outlawed
the term "drug addict": the term is now "drug user".

Pluted Pup

2024-09-05 23:58:50 UTC

Permalink

Post by Pluted Pup

Post by moviePig

Pretty sure that, whether then or now, no public figure openly favors
"illegal immigration".

The term "illegal immigration" has been outlawed by
The New York Times and the Associated Press so how
would you even know? A politician who advocated
"illegal immigration" explicitly would be quoted in
the news with their words translated to"immigration".
Would you ever accuse these news sources of being
misleading? Their reputation is very high.
In likewise fashion the problem of drug addiction
has disappeared: these same sources have outlawed
the term "drug addict": the term is now "drug user".

Consider that the nomenclature used to be "dope fiend".

"Dope Fiend" is a more accurate term than than
outlawing the term addict, pretending that there
is no such thing as drug addiction.

The intent of the lying tabloid trash that is called
"America's national newspaper" and it's partner in
crime The Associated Press is to promote and
recruit new drug users, by stigmatizing drug addicts,
and not using them as an example of the possible result
of casual drug use.

The same "liberal" trash says that illegal immigration
is the same as immigration, by outlawing the term
"illegal immigration" and lumping many millions of
people into the same category, claiming that they are
all the same.

No matter how many powerful people say that "The New York
Times always tells the truth", it doesn't make it
true, and as the progress of monopolization proceeds in the
news media as in everything else, the less true it becomes.